similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4.0 migration (IMPORTANT)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4.0 migration (IMPORTANT)"

2006 Jun 05
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 for Linux@x86
On 6/3/06, Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > I don't think anyone has successfully built llvm-gcc4 on Linux yet. I've > tried and failed. I have :-) There was some patches, but I believe that they were all merged in the latest snapshot. Rafael
2006 Jun 03
5
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 for Linux@x86
Hi! Apparently there are no precompiled binaries for llvm-gcc 4.0 for Linux. I've tried downloading the sources and building according to http://llvm.org/docs/CFEBuildInstrs.html (except I'm not an elite gcc hacker). I tried following the guidelines and got what looks like a gcc for x86 with no traces of LLVM. I tried passing --enable-llvm with various llvm root pathnames and got ICEs.
2006 Nov 08
6
[LLVMdev] 1.9 Next Steps
I created the 1.9 release branch last night. As a reminder, please do not check in any code changes to the release branch. Please send me email if you have changes that need to be merged into the release branch. To check out the release branch: cvs -d <CVS Repository> co -r release_19 llvm cvs -d <CVS Repository> co -r release_19 llvm-test cvs -d <CVS Repository> co -r
2006 Jun 07
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 for Linux@x86
Hmm, today I just tried compiling the llvm-gcc 4.0 frontend again on linux (Fedora Core 3 I believe) and I seem to be suddenly having the problem that Yossi Kreinin mentioned. The frontend seems to be using normal gcc to compile as I no longer get a bytecode file after compilation. When I pass the --version argument it claims to be the LLVM 4.0.1 frontend. Any ideas what might cause this? It was
2006 Jun 07
1
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 for Linux@x86
Hi John, llvm-gcc4 by default emits object files, just as gcc does. This is by design. If you want to get bytecode output you need to use the --emit- llvm-bc option. A complete list of the options that llvm-gcc4 supports can be obtained with "llvm-gcc -v --help" (lots of output). Here are the descriptions of the --emit-llvm options: -emit-llvm Emit LLVM code to the
2006 Jul 31
4
[LLVMdev] Changes to the llvm-gcc4 repository.
NOTE: Starting tomorrow (Aug 1, 2006) the llvm-gcc4 repository will be moved to svn://anonsvn.opensource.apple.com/svn/llvm/trunk. This is to support tagging and future releases. I am told if you go to your llvm svn directory you can; svn switch --relocate svn://anonsvn.opensource.apple.com/svn/llvm svn://anonsvn.opensource.apple.com/svn/llvm/trunk Cheers, -- Jim -------------- next
2007 Aug 12
2
[LLVMdev] Minor issue installing llvm-gcc-4.0
Hi! While trying to build HLVM using the trunk of today, I noticed that I couldn't get llvm-gcc-4.0 installed by simply doing ./install llvm- gcc-4.0 in llvm-top. I did a fresh checkout of llvm-top and pulled some other modules by doing ./get VERBOSE=1 PREFIX=/Users/kroepke/Projects/llvm llvm-gcc-4.0 core support cfe hlvm test-suite Afterwards I did: ./build llvm and ./install llvm
2006 Jun 03
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 for Linux@x86
I don't think anyone has successfully built llvm-gcc4 on Linux yet. I've tried and failed. The instructions in CFEBuildInstrs.html are for llvm-gcc3 and probably won't work as-is. Reid. On Sat, 2006-06-03 at 19:39 +0300, Yossi Kreinin wrote: > Hi! > > Apparently there are no precompiled binaries for llvm-gcc 4.0 for Linux. > > I've tried downloading the sources
2006 Jun 03
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 for Linux@x86
On Sat, 2006-06-03 at 11:25 -0700, Reid Spencer wrote: > I don't think anyone has successfully built llvm-gcc4 on Linux yet. I've > tried and failed. I've successfully built and used llvm-gcc4 on linux/alpha Andrew
2006 Aug 20
2
[LLVMdev] stdlib.h
Dear guys, my llvm-gcc does not compile stdlib.h correctly. I found this explanation here: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=567 Indeed, I am running Mac OS 10.4. Do I have to rebuild my gcc front-end from source, or there is a script in the LLVM website that could help me? Best regards, Fernando
2006 Aug 01
0
[LLVMdev] Changes to the llvm-gcc4 repository.
Still hasn't gone through yet. I'm predicting 11am EST. Cheers, -- Jim On Jul 31, 2006, at 7:18 PM, Jim Laskey wrote: > NOTE: Starting tomorrow (Aug 1, 2006) the llvm-gcc4 repository > will be moved to svn://anonsvn.opensource.apple.com/svn/llvm/ > trunk. This is to support tagging and future releases. > > I am told if you go to your llvm svn directory you can;
2006 Aug 01
1
[LLVMdev] Changes to the llvm-gcc4 repository.
Apologies. Looks like the merges didn't take. I'll try and straighten this out today. Watch for the posting tomorrow. Cheers, -- Jim On Aug 1, 2006, at 7:59 AM, Jim Laskey wrote: > Still hasn't gone through yet. I'm predicting 11am EST. > > Cheers, > > -- Jim > > > > On Jul 31, 2006, at 7:18 PM, Jim Laskey wrote: > >> NOTE: Starting
2006 Jul 31
1
[LLVMdev] Changes to the llvm-gcc4 repository.
NOTE: Starting tomorrow (Aug 1, 2006) the llvm-gcc4 repository will be moved to svn://anonsvn.opensource.apple.com/svn/llvm/trunk. This is to support tagging and future releases. Cheers, -- Jim -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20060731/4172fba9/attachment.html> -------------- next
2006 Sep 20
2
Flac metadata at end?
On Wednesday 20 September 8:56 pm, Alex Jones wrote: > I think the consequences outweigh the benefits. Having metadata at the > beginning of the file serves as metadata and gives you important > information such as expected stream length. Pushing this to the back for > the sake of making tag updates quicker seems a bit of a bad move to me - > how often do you re-tag your files?
2007 Jul 17
4
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4-2 development branch is open
Hi Bill, > > I checked out llvm-gcc-4.0 from mirror svn server and our internal svn. > > And I do see the difference, but I do not understand why. > > > > Bill, any idea ? > > > No clue. I wrote a message to the guy handling the mirror sync. can you please also ask him to check if the mirror is being updated. The last commit never turned up. Thanks, Duncan.
2006 Nov 08
0
[LLVMdev] 1.9 Next Steps
Hi Tanya, I've been checking the state of the various llvm-test failures on X86/Linux with GCC 3.4.6 and llvm-gcc4. I haven't finished this, but I thought the following might be useful for other people that are testing the release on Linux. Each group of failing tests below is followed by a comment about why its failing. llc /MultiSource/Applications/oggenc/oggenc jit
2006 Dec 13
1
Problem with tuned Rblas from CRAN with R-2.4.0
I encountered the following problem in R-2.4.0 for Windows binary downloaded from CRAN (data from R-help post by Ethan Johnsons). I was also using the contributed binary Rblas.dll for Intel P4 chip. The problem doesn't occur with the default Rblas.dll. x=c(3.05176E-05, 0.000457764, 0.003204346, 0.0138855, 0.04165649, 0.09164429, 0.1527405, 0.1963806, 0.1963806, 0.1527405, 0.09164429,
2007 Jul 17
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4-2 development branch is open
Duncan, On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 14:03 +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Bill, > > > > I checked out llvm-gcc-4.0 from mirror svn server and our internal svn. > > > And I do see the difference, but I do not understand why. > > > > > > Bill, any idea ? > > > > > No clue. I wrote a message to the guy handling the mirror sync. > > can you
2014 Jul 15
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Bug in MapVector::erase ?
> On 2014-Jul-15, at 11:07, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > > Can we explicitly delete the erase method or do something else to document the fact that it is unsupported? It was added incidentally in r211350, even though it was added and removed by Doug back in r175538 / r175449. > I'm happy with it deleted or fixed (see WIP patch that fixes it w/o tests). For
2006 Jul 31
0
[LLVMdev] Changes to the llvm-gcc4 repository.
Jim Laskey wrote: > NOTE: Starting tomorrow (Aug 1, 2006) the llvm-gcc4 repository will be > moved to svn://anonsvn.opensource.apple.com/svn/llvm/trunk. This is to > support tagging and future releases. Will this update live, or will it still synchronize nightly? Nick Lewycky