similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM-MIPS

On 19/07/2007 01:29:18, Seung Jae Lee (lee225 at uiuc.edu) wrote: > Somebody in this dev-list alreday did it with LLVM. I guess you are speaking about Bruno Cardoso Lopes ? I can see there is a MIPS implementation in LLVM repository but it looks like uncomplete (that is, I'm not even sure it can compile any source). What I hope is to have a complete MIPS implementation so I can adapt

Hi Hidle, 2007/7/19, Hlide <hlide at free.fr>: > > On 19/07/2007 01:29:18, Seung Jae Lee (lee225 at uiuc.edu) wrote: > > Somebody in this dev-list alreday did it with LLVM. > > I guess you are speaking about Bruno Cardoso Lopes ? I can see there is > a MIPS implementation in LLVM repository but it looks like uncomplete > (that is, I'm not even sure it can

<cc'ing llvmdev, please don't email me directly> On Sun, 27 May 2007, Christophe Avoinne wrote: > On 23/05/2007 22:05:48, Chris Lattner (sabre at nondot.org) wrote: > > LLVM 2.0 is done! Download it here: http://llvm.org/releases/ or view > > the release notes: http://llvm.org/releases/2.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html > > > > Hello Chris. > > Your

Xi, I just installed VS2005 pro w/ SP1 for Win Vista. Thanks, Seung ---- Original message ---- >Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:36:43 +0800 >From: "Xi Wang" <xi.wang at gmail.com> >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005? >To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > >I'm sorry but did you

I noticed that the MIPS backend was developed as a backend for the generic MIPS processor and also as a Google SoC targeting the Allegrex CPU, however there is no support for vector instructions. I see that vectorization is a very powerfull weapon from LLVM when compared to other compilers but in the case of the Allegrex CPU it is not supported. Are there any plans in the near future to add

Ok, here are a few suggestions and comments: 1) LLVM has the capabilities to do everything that you are trying to re-implement. 2) Have you looked at the C backend? It recreates loops. It may not create "for" loops but you can hack on it to do that. 3) The way you are converting out of SSA is wrong. You will suffer from lost copies. You should look at using demotePHI(). see

try here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/inger this project have a ebook (Compiler Construction: A Practical Approach) that covers some backend code generation techniques. On 2/1/07, Seung Jae Lee <lee225 at uiuc.edu> wrote: > Can you recommend any good book or reference for backend implementation? I skimmed some compiler books but it seemed to be more about front-end, parsing,

Somebody in this dev-list alreday did it with LLVM. He seems to consult you. ---- Original message ---- >Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 22:29:02 +0200 >From: Hlide <hlide at free.fr> >Subject: [LLVMdev] LLVM-MIPS >To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > >Hi, > >I would like to know if a MIPS back-end of LLVM would be done soon or we >may never see one. > >I'm looking

Hello. My name is Seung Jae Lee. I'd like to ask you onething about converting to ARM assembly code. I saved the simplest C code shown in your LLVM webpage as 'hello.c' And I made 'hello.bc' by "$ llvm-gcc hello.c -o hello". In order to make ARM assembly code, I typed "llc -march=arm hello.bc -o hello.arm" But, I met this error. llc: ARMISelDAGToDAG.cpp:73:

Dear Prof.Adve and Bill, I deeply appreciate your comments and concerns. (Please forgive my late response. I've tried some more cases to make this issue) As Prof.Adve mentioned, I need to explain exactly what my problem is, but I have no good ability that I can explain it in this plain text space. For this reason, I made a .pdf file and linked it as follows:

I am doing boot with a large database, thus want to use?simple=TRUE to reduce the memory used. I alreday set up sim="ordinary", stype="i" , but I don't know how to set "n=0". In fact, I don't know what does "n=0" mean? For example, a<-c(1:1000) b<-c(2:1001) c<-cbind(a,b) library(boot) table<-function(c,indices){ d<-c[indices,]

I have installed LLVM on my machine (ubuntu) a while ago. I think my LLVM version is 2.8. is it supported in 2.8 ? When I install i didn't configure LLVM for mips. Do I have to configure it when I build ? Thanks in advance. Really appreciate it. --- On Thu, 9/1/11, Bruno Cardoso Lopes <bruno.cardoso at gmail.com> wrote: From: Bruno Cardoso Lopes <bruno.cardoso at gmail.com>

No, No... That's OK. I appreciate your concerns. Seung Jae Lee ---- Original message ---- >Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:30:59 -0700 >From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] adding a target for "-march=" option in Visual Studio (Resolved) >To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > >Seung Jae Lee wrote:

Bill, Depending on what Seung's problem is, converting *out* of SSA form may actually be the wrong thing to do. Seung needs to explain exactly problem he is unable solve using SSA form. --Vikram http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve http://llvm.org/ On Jan 28, 2008, at 1:10 AM, Bill Wendling wrote: > Hi Seung, > > It should be fairly straight-forward to do in LLVM. Once you

Thank you, Patrick. What I want to do is just to write those source level variable names in my assembly code for a virtual machine because it is instructed in its instructions manual. I registered the VM as a target for LLC and want to emit the assembly. For this reason, I asked how to get the variables themselves which are not mangled from the bytecode. Thanks to your help, now I see they can be

Thank you for your kind explanation. I did it as you mentioned. That is, I set '-march=x86 hello.bc' in the Command Arguments. (I also set my compiled LLC, i.e., LLVM_ROOT_DIR\win32\debug\llc.exe, in the property name Command.) But, when I made a breakpoint in main( ) of llc.cpp and then started to debug I found the 'InputFilename'(llc.cpp:176) is shown like {???}. Therefore it

Hi, We use wine 1.2 to run a sales application. The application uses modal windows. First let me explain how it works on windows. If the user clicks in the application (a specific action not anywhere) a new child window opens. This new window has a higher priority and is always on top. And until the user doesn't complete the form this child window will stay in focus and on top. The user can

Thank you so much for your reply, Chris. If so, can I ask you two things more? First, is there any way to have various optimizations on LLVM assembly such as -O options in llvmc? llvm-gcc doesn't seem to be working for these -O options... Second, I'm still not sure about difference between *.s and *.ll. LLVM assembly *.s file can be made from llvm-gcc with -S option. Another

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 4:30 PM, James Molloy <James.Molloy at arm.com> wrote: > Hi, > > There are numerous emails flying around the list at the moment regarding the state of the JIT. In its current state it is infeasible to add support for another architecture (very difficult to say the least) - there are plans currently being formulated to deal with this and convert the JIT to the

Hello all, I need some help/infomation/correction regarding storing the SIP peers in a database table via ARA. I've alreday created the SQLite3 database table and the related ODBC plumbing and have Asterisk (1.4) validating the SIP devices from a table and updating it correctly with dynamic infomation, for example the device's IP address. Problem is: I have a scenario whereby I change