similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM website links broken (fwd)

Jim Grosbach wrote: > > On Aug 30, 2009, at 10:18 AM, Paul Melis wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Bill Wendling wrote: >>> Before we had buildbots, a random patch would break the system. It >>> would sometimes take a whole day to determine which patch broke it. >> I see the buildbots are currently showing no problem on 32-bit linux >> but >> I

Paul Melis wrote: > Paul Melis wrote: > >> Jim Grosbach wrote: >> >>> On Aug 30, 2009, at 10:18 AM, Paul Melis wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Bill Wendling wrote: >>>> >>>>> Before we had buildbots, a random patch would break the system. It >>>>>

On Aug 31, 2009, at 6:48 AM, Paul Melis wrote: > Paul Melis wrote: >> Jim Grosbach wrote: >>> >>> On Aug 30, 2009, at 10:18 AM, Paul Melis wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Bill Wendling wrote: >>>>> Before we had buildbots, a random patch would break the system. It >>>>> would sometimes take a

Hello, Bill Wendling wrote: > Before we had buildbots, a random patch would break the system. It > would sometimes take a whole day to determine which patch broke it. I see the buildbots are currently showing no problem on 32-bit linux but I get the following build error with TOT (out-of-source autoconf build): [...] make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/melis/c/llvm-svn-release/tools'

Paul Melis wrote: > Jim Grosbach wrote: >> >> On Aug 30, 2009, at 10:18 AM, Paul Melis wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Bill Wendling wrote: >>>> Before we had buildbots, a random patch would break the system. It >>>> would sometimes take a whole day to determine which patch broke it. >>> I see the buildbots are currently

On Aug 30, 2009, at 10:18 AM, Paul Melis wrote: > Hello, > > Bill Wendling wrote: >> Before we had buildbots, a random patch would break the system. It >> would sometimes take a whole day to determine which patch broke it. > I see the buildbots are currently showing no problem on 32-bit linux > but > I get the following build error with TOT (out-of-source autoconf

Sure, sorry about that -- FYI, the "Maintained By" link goes to your email, so you might want to change that. Harry > On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, Harry Metcalfe wrote: > > Just thought I'd let you know that all the links at: > > http://llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/index.html > > are broken. > > Thanks, I added this to PR1535. In the future, please email llvmdev

Hello, Paul > >> ../llvm-gcc-svn/configure \ > >> --prefix=/home/melis/llvm \ > >> --program-prefix=llvm- \ > >> --with-llvm=/home/melis/c/llvm-svn \ You need to use --enable-llvm, not --with-llvm > gcc version 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5649) As you can see - this is not llvm-enabled gcc -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov.

Hello all, Does anyone have any inside why I can't get the below simple C API test to link? This is on a 32-bit Gentoo Linux system and LLVM TOT which was compiled with enable-optimized, gcc is 4.3.2. 15:26|melis at juggle2:~/c/llvmpy> cat t.c #include "llvm-c/Core.h" int main() { LLVMContextRef ctx; ctx = LLVMContextCreate(); return 0; } 15:29|melis at

Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Hello, Paul > > >>>> ../llvm-gcc-svn/configure \ >>>> --prefix=/home/melis/llvm \ >>>> --program-prefix=llvm- \ >>>> --with-llvm=/home/melis/c/llvm-svn \ >>>> > You need to use --enable-llvm, not --with-llvm > Ok >> gcc version 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build

Hi Oscar, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Paul Melis <llvm at assumetheposition.nl> writes: > > [snip] > > Thanks! Fixed. > > BTW, bug reports are welcome. > It seems that the llvm-config generated when building through CMake does not contain -lpthread on my 32-bit Core2Duo Gentoo Linux system (even though I configured with LLVM_ENABLE_PTHREADS). I get missing symbols

"Paul Melis" <llvm at assumetheposition.nl> writes: > 15:29|melis at juggle2:~/c/llvmpy> gcc -W -Wall -o blah `llvm-config --cflags > --ldflags --libs all` t.c > /tmp/ccs4MbKp.o: In function `main': > t.c:(.text+0x21): undefined reference to `LLVMContextCreate' > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > 15:29|melis at juggle2:~/c/llvmpy> nm

"Paul Melis" <llvm at assumetheposition.nl> writes: >>> 15:29|melis at juggle2:~/c/llvmpy> gcc -W -Wall -o blah `llvm-config >>> --cflags >>> --ldflags --libs all` t.c >>> /tmp/ccs4MbKp.o: In function `main': >>> t.c:(.text+0x21): undefined reference to `LLVMContextCreate' >>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Paul Melis <llvm at assumetheposition.nl> writes: > > >> It seems that the llvm-config generated when building through CMake does >> not contain -lpthread on my 32-bit Core2Duo Gentoo Linux system (even >> though I configured with LLVM_ENABLE_PTHREADS). I get missing symbols >> during linking of e.g. the JIT tutorial code: >>

Paul Melis <llvm at assumetheposition.nl> writes: > It seems that the llvm-config generated when building through CMake does > not contain -lpthread on my 32-bit Core2Duo Gentoo Linux system (even > though I configured with LLVM_ENABLE_PTHREADS). I get missing symbols > during linking of e.g. the JIT tutorial code: [snip] This should be fixed now. Now about this one: >

Paul Melis wrote: > Óscar Fuentes wrote: > >> Paul Melis <llvm at assumetheposition.nl> writes: >> >> >> >>> It seems that the llvm-config generated when building through CMake does >>> not contain -lpthread on my 32-bit Core2Duo Gentoo Linux system (even >>> though I configured with LLVM_ENABLE_PTHREADS). I get missing

July Status Update ------------------ Hi everyone! This month has been a busy month of cleanups and refinements, and marks over a year of LLVM status updates :). LLVM is getting substantially smaller (in memory footprint) and faster, received a few cool new features, and has a few more fixed bugs. We are currently thinking about unleashing the LLVM 1.3 release in about 3-4 weeks from now. If

Hey everyone, It's been way too long since the last status update. Since that last edition, we've gone through the 1.0 release, fixed a ton of bugs, and implemented some neat new things. Since many people are using the 1.0 release, I'll break the changes into "before 1.0" and "after 1.0" sections: Before 1.0: ----------- 1. We've cleaned up the source base

On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Vikram S. Adve wrote: > Please apply directly using the forms or URL below, or contact Luiz if you > have questions. --Vikram Are these posting llvm related? If not, they are not appropriate for llvmdev. -Chris > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: "Luiz DeRose" <ldr at cray.com> >> Date: December 5, 2006 5:26:01 PM CST >>

FYI, this may be useful to others... > Quick question. I have a CallInst *, how do i know if its a direct > function call or a call via a function pointer? if (Function *F = dyn_cast<Function>(CI->getOperand(0))) { it's a direct call > If it is a function pointer, is it easy to get all the possible > functions that have the signature (i guess the DSGraph would be