similar to: [LLVMdev] Floating point constants (bug?)

On Sun, 15 Jul 2007, Ben Chambers wrote: > ... > store float 0x4016A3D700000000, float* %f > ... > > Which is correct, but is a pain to have to parse. Ideally, floating > point would be printed like it says in the language guide, only using > the hexadecimal representation when decimal representation is > impossible. In this case, however, 5.66e+00 seems pretty

It appears to me based on my experiments with llvm-as that literal floating-point constants may be specified in the 64-bit IEEE hexadecimal format, but not in the 32-bit format. For instance, this file: target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32- i64:32:64-f32:32:32-f64:32:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64- f80:128:128" target triple =

Ok, here is the patch again... I also included fixes for the bits that originally gave my mailer fits... Two votes for orange, so I went with orange... Doing diffs in .: --- ./lib/AsmParser/LLLexer.cpp.~1~ 2007-12-14 22:09:06.000000000 -0800 +++ ./lib/AsmParser/LLLexer.cpp 2007-12-15 13:02:47.000000000 -0800 @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static uint64_t HexIntToVal(const char * Result +=

On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 2:59 AM, Stéphane Letz <letz at free.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > We need to generate "Floating point constants" in our code. In http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html it is explained that FP has to follow special encoding rules to be handled by LLVM later one (hexadecimal coding...) > > Is there any code available in LLVM  to handle this kind of

Le 2 juin 2010 à 12:21, Eli Friedman a écrit : > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 2:59 AM, Stéphane Letz <letz at free.fr> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We need to generate "Floating point constants" in our code. In http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html it is explained that FP has to follow special encoding rules to be handled by LLVM later one (hexadecimal coding...) >>

Hi, We need to generate "Floating point constants" in our code. In http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html it is explained that FP has to follow special encoding rules to be handled by LLVM later one (hexadecimal coding...) Is there any code available in LLVM to handle this kind of "standard float to LLVM float" conversion? Thanks. Stéphane Letz

On Jun 2, 2010, at 3:28 AMPDT, Stéphane Letz wrote: > > Le 2 juin 2010 à 12:21, Eli Friedman a écrit : > >> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 2:59 AM, Stéphane Letz <letz at free.fr> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> We need to generate "Floating point constants" in our code. In http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html it is explained that FP has to follow special

Le 2 juin 2010 à 19:48, Dale Johannesen a écrit : > > On Jun 2, 2010, at 3:28 AMPDT, Stéphane Letz wrote: > >> >> Le 2 juin 2010 à 12:21, Eli Friedman a écrit : >> >>> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 2:59 AM, Stéphane Letz <letz at free.fr> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> We need to generate "Floating point constants"

Hi, after upgrading to 2.1 I noticed that the format for floating point numbers in .ll files apparently changed. I now get errors like "llvm-as: var.ll:48,0: Floating point constant invalid for type" for such code: "@gmFloat = constant float 0.3". I checked with llvm-gcc and it now generates code for the hexadecimal floating point representation. The documentation at

On Oct 2, 2007, at 8:15 AM, Jan Rehders wrote: > Hi, > > after upgrading to 2.1 I noticed that the format for floating point > numbers in .ll files apparently changed. I now get errors like > > "llvm-as: var.ll:48,0: Floating point constant invalid for type" > > for such code: > > "@gmFloat = constant float 0.3". > > I checked with llvm-gcc

This patch introduces a handful of new options, I mentioned earlier in: http://www.mail-archive.com/nut-upsdev at lists.alioth.debian.org/msg02088.html See the large commit message in the follow-up for the details and rationale. I realize it's a bit larger diff - so if it's required I can split it into few smaller ones. Michal Soltys (1): APC smart driver update and new features.

I'm writing a C compiler in OCaml and I've run into a small problem. I wrote the following piece of code to generate a pointer to a string constant, so I could compile C expressions of the form "const char* p = "test\n";" : let strval = const_stringz codecontext v in dump_value strval; dump_value i32_zero; const_gep strval [| i32_zero; i32_zero |] The dump statements

I'm confused about the hexadecimal format for entering floating-point constants. The bit pattern for 1.0 as a single-precision float is 0x3f800000. I tried entering the constant as 'float 0x3f800000', but the assembler said the constant was invalid for the type. The bit pattern for 1.0 as a double-precision float is 0x3ff0000000000000, so I entered the constant as 'float

On 01/05/2007 7:21 AM, Stephan wrote: > Hi, > >> 0x10L > returns: int 0 > > I would expect: int 16? > This happens with all integer constants given by hexadecimal notation. > It's a bug? Certainly looks like one; I've cc'd this to the bug list (but won't be able to look into fixing it). Duncan Murdoch > > >> sessionInfo() > R

Question 1: I am trying to get a function not to be inlined. What are llvm's rules pertaining to inlining? I have tried all of the standard gcc options for turning off inlining and they do not seem to work. Here is the sample code that I am working with: #include <stdio.h> void print_string(char* strval); int main() { char* strval = "Hello world\n"; while(1){

> ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 11:07:39 -0700 > From: Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Generating Floating point constants > To: St?phane Letz <letz at free.fr> > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Message-ID: <AEC895CC-E887-4329-8743-FA606BD401F6 at apple.com> > Content-Type:

This is 2nd version of the earlier patch featuring a few new features and fixes to the apcsmart driver, following the remarks in: http://www.mail-archive.com/nut-upsdev at lists.alioth.debian.org/msg02294.html Major changes from v1: - handle battery.charge and battery.runtime checks at main.c level - handle "immutable but writable" conflict gracefully at driver level -

Sorry for a bit longer delay than I anticipated, I was stuffed with the work. This is the next iteration of the patch adding some functionality to apcsmart driver, and relying on 'ignorelb' recently added. Follow up from previous thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/nut-upsdev at lists.alioth.debian.org/msg02331.html Main differences is that V3 is split into many small patches, so the

On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Feb 13, 2012, at 2:00 AM, Talin wrote: > > Just out of curiosity, why not MurmurHash3 ? This page seems to >> suggest that #2 has some flaw, and #3 is better all round: >> >> https://sites.google.com/site/murmurhash/ >> >> The main reason is because there's no

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Jay Foad <jay.foad at gmail.com> wrote: > On 13 February 2012 00:59, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > > Here's my latest version of Hashing.h, which I propose to add to > llvm/ADT. > > Comments welcome and encouraged. > > > /// Adapted from MurmurHash2 by Austin Appleby > > Just out of curiosity, why not