similar to: [LLVMdev] not to break 'for' statement into basic blocks

According to the instruction manual of this target machine, 'goto' should not be used in C code. :-/ Could you tell me a little more about your advice as to using 'reg2mem', if you're fine? Thank you so much, Anton. Best, Seung J. Lee ---- Original message ---- >Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 02:23:27 +0400 >From: Anton Korobeynikov <asl at math.spbu.ru> >Subject:

Thank you so much but could you tell me a little bit more in detail about that you suggested? Sorry, I'm just a greenhorn. Thanks, Seung J. Lee ---- Original message ---- >Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 21:26:14 -0500 >From: "David A. Greene" <greened at obbligato.org> >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] not to break 'for' statement into basic blocks >To: llvmdev at

Dear LLVM guys, Hi. I first became to be interested in the compiler work, especially LLVM, since last October, still I'm a novice on here. (My major is not CS, either. :-\) Please forgive my ignorance. LLVM optimization and other tools are really fantastic. However I don't want LLVM breaks my 'for' statement in C code into basic blocks during compiling. I'm sure this sounds

>> As part of the advanced compilers course semester project (at >> UIUC), we >> are starting to implement array dependence analysis for LLVM. Great! This is something we've needed for a long time. > I'm currently working on a similar project and hoping to finish it in > about two weeks. Cool! I think the most critical part of this is to get a good

Hello All, I recently installed CentOS 5 and was trying to locate the kernel-smp packages but without success. Have these packages been removed from the distro or renamed? Does anyone know how many processors the default kernel will handle and if it's optimzed for it? Thanks, james

Hi, > Cool! I think the most critical part of this is to get a good > interface for dependence analysis. There are lots of interesting > implementations that have various time/space tradeoffs. > > For example, it would be great if Omega was available as an option, > even if the compiler didn't use it by default. This argues for making > dependence analysis

I've done quite a bit of looking, but I haven't found an answer that answers this question. Environment: cygwin on Windows rsync 3.0.4 I know that rsync isn't optimzed for speed on local copies - that's clear in my testing. I'm attemting to sync a large volume of files. (In this case, I'm syncing a rdiff-backup set...) An initial sync will be about one fourth as fast a

Hi, Is it me or is CentOS 5 faster than FC6? I just switched and it seems that CentOS 5 loads faster and overall feels snappier. Could Red Hat have optimzed EL more than Fedora?. Just curious. I really like what I see with CentOS 5. The devs have done a great job making a profesisonal looking distro. An of course kudos to Red Hat for all the engineering and for making the SRPMS available. Paul

Hi guys, I am understanding OpenCL compilation flow on GPU in order to develop OpenCL runtime for a new hardware. I understood that OpenCL compiler is part of a vendor's runtime library which is the heart of OpenCL. Since OpenCL kernel is compiled at runtime, hence at high level its compilation takes place in two steps: i. source code is first converted to intermediate code. ii.

Hello, Normally, in addition to such qdisc scheduler mechanisms as FIFO, PQ, WRR, WFQ, are there any more? Then, there is a confusion on scheduler in Linux enviroment: Assume there is a qdisc, such as RED as a leaf qdisc in a router, we know, if there is packet which want to enqueue the packet, the Function red_enqueue is called, but when the packet leave the queue(when the Function red_dequeue

Wow... Thank you so much for this. I'll try this one. Thanks again, Wojciech. SJL ---- Original message ---- >Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 15:07:34 +0200 >From: Wojciech Matyjewicz <wmatyjewicz at fastmail.fm> >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] constructing 'for' statement from LLVM bitcode >To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > >Hi, >

Dear Wojciech Matyjewicz: Thank you for your advice. I could follow what you had suggested upto opt -analyze -loops bsloop-opt.bc Therefore, I could get the prints you had showed me as follows: -------------------------------------------------------- Printing analysis 'Natural Loop Construction' for function 'bsloop': Loop Containing: %bb16, %bb13, %bb8, %bb1 Loop

Hi, I have a question about tracing BB's in LLVM. When tracing BB's, does LLVM insert instrumentation code in each BB? Thanks, Rahul

I'm using an SVM as I've seen a paper that reported extremely good results. I'm not having such luck. I'm also interested in ideas for other approaches to the problem that can also be applied to general problems (no assuming that we're looking for spirals). Here is my code: library(mlbench) library(e1071) raw <- mlbench.spirals(194, 2) spiral <-

On Mar 18, 2008, at 9:21 AM, Wojciech Matyjewicz wrote: > Hi, > >> Cool! I think the most critical part of this is to get a good >> interface for dependence analysis. There are lots of interesting >> implementations that have various time/space tradeoffs. >> >> For example, it would be great if Omega was available as an option, >> even if the compiler

> Dear R Helpers! > > bgtest{lmtest} performs the Breusch-Godfrey test for higher > order serial > correlation. > > Is the Higher Order Correlation function already programmed in > R I couldn't find it? > > Sergei Petrov > ?acf ?pacf HTH, Bernhard ---------------------------------------------------------------------- If you have received this e-mail

Hi All: A couple of weeks back, I asked a question on the list that I was invited to provide an introductory lecture on R to a group of academicians in Kolkata. I thank all of you who had generously guided me in providing me web links and words to the wise. Time to give back. I did the presentation on introduction to R and uploaded the presentation files at the following site:

Hello I am developing a backend that generates OpenCL from llvm bitcode. I start with a revived fork of the original LLVM C-Backend and have been modifying it. One thing that the backend lacked was generating proper loop structures; instead it relied on labels and goto statements. Therefore, I am trying to find a way to identify the loop structure and print it out in the backend. So far, the main

hello, i'm reading the doc at http://xiph.org/ogg/vorbis/doc/Vorbis_I_spec.html and the link to the paper http://www.iocon.com/resource/docs/ps/eusipco_corrected.ps doesn't work. Could anyone correct the link and/or mirror this paper ? Thanks, YG --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list,

Hi On http://www.xiph.org/ogg/vorbis/doc/vorbis-spec-intro.html there is a link to a document titled 'The use of multirate filter banks for coding of high quality digital audio' that explains window functions for iMDCT. I would very much like to read that document, but the link is broken. If someone would send me the document or a working link to it, I would be very happy. Thanks in