similar to: [LLVMdev] CVS or SUBVERSION, which is correct?

Hello, Bill > And wasn't the llvm-gcc sources supposed to be there as well? Not yet. I think this should be the second stage. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.

Hi ! I'm quite confused. When I look at http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm-gcc-4-2/trunk/README.LLVM I read "First, check out LLVM from CVS" ... but isn't LLVM now in Subversion?

Important Announcement! The netfilter.org CVS server (pserver.netfilter.org) has been deprecated by the new subversion repository at svn.netfilter.org. More information about the subversion revision control system can be found at http://subversion.tigris.org/. Everybody has read-only access to the new subversion tree using either svn+http or svn+https. We do not provide the native svn protocol.

Holger. > You can find out what exactly leaks with the help of valgrind. It seems, that Paolo is on Mac OS X. No valgrind there :( -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.

Dear LLVMers, The first phase of the Subversion conversion is complete. The CVS repository will no longer be available. You will now need to use the SVN server. Directions for getting LLVM from the SVN server can be found in the new Getting Started Guide (http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html). If you run a nightly tester, you should update your LLVM tree from SVN to get the new

Hey all, Bit of a bogus question here as I only have a basic understanding of CVS and Subversion. A lot of the windows development tools we use in the office have CVS or Subversion modules allowing us greater source code control. It would be wonderful to have a samba share that acts as an interface to a CVS or Subversion backend. That way we can use any development tool and simply save our

On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 17:20 -0400, Daniel F. Savarese wrote: > Kevin Smith writes > : > >Can someone who has used SVN comment? > > I started reading it and stopped before finishing because the author > is judging Subversion by using it in a way that doesn''t make any sense > for Subversion. Fair enough. Can you confirm that merging between branches within an

Hi Anton, You're already a part of the llvm development team by participating actively on the llvm development list :) If you wish we can put you on: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/Developers.html Great to have you on the team, welcome! We (Jeff, Morten, Paolo, the rest of the team and I) are looking forward to cooperate with you and to push win32 and mingw versions even further to stable and

Can anyone suggest some step-by-step tutorials for using CVS or Subversion on Sourceforge with OS X ? I''m a new to RoR and creating a Sourceforge project was recommended as a way of working and learning from/with others. But I can''t get over the hurdle of transferring what I''ve already build to csv.sourceforge or subversion.sourceforge. All my attempts generate

How can a frontend tell LLVM to put a function argument on stack/register/etc? On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Anton Korobeynikov <asl at math.spbu.ru> wrote: >> Ah, got it. >> Sounds like we might need to introduce CC_X86_Win32_MSVC_ThisCall then?.. > No, we should not. It should be properly expanded in frontend. > > -- > With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov >

So is there any possibility of getting it so that the Subversion repository can get the check-in comments from the internal CVS repository? At the moment every log file comment I see in SVN is "Sync". Which doesn't really let me know what has happenned without having to go lock at the actual diff between the two versions. And even then I may not have any idea why the change was

So is there any possibility of getting it so that the Subversion repository can get the check-in comments from the internal CVS repository? At the moment every log file comment I see in SVN is "Sync". Which doesn't really let me know what has happenned without having to go lock at the actual diff between the two versions. And even then I may not have any idea why the change was

I tried to ask for 32 and that didn't seem to help. MallocInst also seemed to ignore the 16 byte directive. For now, I'm just issuing all my loads as unaligned and that's working ok. Thanks, Chuck. -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Evan Cheng Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 10:35 AM To: asl at

Chuck, > It is dying trying to store a our working vector into one of the LLVM > vectors created on the stack. Despite the align-16 directive on the > alloca instruction, it is not always aligning to a 16-byte boundary. The stack is not necessary 16 bytes aligned on linux/windows. The vector is really sotred aligned relative to %esp, but %esp value is not good. This is known problem

2013/3/28 Anton Korobeynikov <asl at math.spbu.ru>: >> How can having an MSVC compatible compiler be to the detriment of clang and >> llvm? No one is trying to break mingw here, merely add support for something > Just to make stuff clear: I just wanted proper naming which will be > non-confusing. Right now we have: > - isTargetWindows() which really means

Hello, Bill. > Has anyone gotten the latest/greatest sources from the LLVM-GCC open > source server lately? No. It's still at rev 319 (as of 29.04). -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.

Bill, > When I try to compile on Darwin now, I get this: Could you please provide LLVM bytecode, where bug is reproducible with llc? -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.

Hello, Rafael > With this patch I was able to bootstrap gcc in linux x86-64 with > shared libraries enabled :-) Awesome! But... -ENOPATCH :( -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.

Hello, Greg. You wrote Saturday, May 13, 2006, 11:12:26 PM: GP> The problem is that it can't find some symbols: (SymSetOptions, GP> SymInitialize, SymGetModuleBase, SymFunctionTableAccess, etc.) GP> I looked on the Web and these functions are in Dbghelp.lib. GP> Are they also in libimagehlp.a? Yes, they are. At least im mingw-runtime 3.9 (I'm using this version). GP>

> Ah, got it. > Sounds like we might need to introduce CC_X86_Win32_MSVC_ThisCall then?.. No, we should not. It should be properly expanded in frontend. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University