similar to: [LLVMdev] new website prototype

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] new website prototype"

2007 Jul 05
0
[LLVMdev] new website prototype
On 05 Jul 2007, at 08:32, Chris Lattner wrote: > At this point, I'm interested in feedback and help. I've only > tried the > page with one browser, so it's entirely possible it looks like a > monkey's > armpit on other popular browsers. There is still a ton of missing > content > that needs to be filled in. The site also currently just includes >
2007 Jul 09
1
[LLVMdev] new website prototype
On Sun, 8 Jul 2007, Gabriel McArthur wrote: >> Any help would be appreciated. For the record, I'm not tied to any one >> specific color scheme or site design, but I'd like to see this start >> moving forward. Is anyone interested in contributing? > I have done a couple of decent cross-browser compatible web sites. I > would like to give it a shot. My design
2012 Dec 13
2
The FLAC website
On 14 September 2012 18:01, Martijn van Beurden <mvanb1 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I've updated the RSS feed and made the pages fetch and display that feed. > Now only the feed had to be updated to update the pages as well. > > I have included a patch, however, I've never worked with git before so I > hope everything is done correctly. If not, please tell
2007 Jul 09
0
[LLVMdev] new website prototype
On Jul 5, 2007, at 1:32 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > Any help would be appreciated. For the record, I'm not tied to any > one > specific color scheme or site design, but I'd like to see this start > moving forward. Is anyone interested in contributing? > > -Chris I have done a couple of decent cross-browser compatible web sites. I would like to give it a shot.
2012 Aug 30
2
The FLAC website
Sorry, for the late repsonse Martijn. I've been crazy busy. Martijn van Beurden wrote: > On 28-08-12 10:46, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > I think thats a great idea. WOuld be happy to have someone pick > > this up and run with it. > > So I got busy but stumbled upon several things. I'm not sure why there > are two boxes displaying the same news on the homepage
2007 Aug 13
6
[LLVMdev] LLVM performance test
Hi all, I did a performance test of two real applications (FFMPEG and GTK) on ARM. For more details see: http://laurovenancio.wordpress.com/2007/08/07/llvm-perf-tests/ Lauro
2007 Aug 14
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM performance test
Hi Lauro, On 14 Aug 2007, at 01:10, Lauro Ramos Venancio wrote: > Hi all, > > I did a performance test of two real applications (FFMPEG and GTK) on > ARM. For more details see: > http://laurovenancio.wordpress.com/2007/08/07/llvm-perf-tests/ Could you give me some more information about the applications you compiled and ran? Where can I obtain source codes, which input did
2010 Jul 06
1
[LLVMdev] list of LLVM optimization passes
On Jul 6, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Manuel Llosa wrote: > Dear Kenneth, I see. Do you plan sharing your framework in open source? > For now, I will continue using ctuning tools (they support LLVM as is but not > some specific things on JIT dynamic recompilation what is my thesis about). > I will like to compare all tools of course and will be happy > to share results although real not
2006 Aug 31
2
[LLVMdev] compiling the full SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode
On 31 Aug 2006, at 19:13, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > >> When I adjust the settings in Makefile.nagfortran as follows, I'm >> able to get bytecode file for lucas, galgel and facerec, but make >> still quits with an error (after generating >> bytecode files for 7 (out of 26) benchmarks. >> >> Also, the file
2006 Aug 31
0
[LLVMdev] compiling the full SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > Bummer. I think I'll contact the NAG support for more info on this. Can you > show me the content of your Makefile.nagfortran? It is identical to yours. > Also, it is possible to tell make only to compile benchmark X? How can I > enforce this? Go into the directory for that benchmark, then run 'make' or whatever. -Chris --
2007 Mar 18
6
[LLVMdev] Google SOC - Idea
Hi, I noticed that LLVM had signed up as a mentoring organization for Google's summer of code. LLVM looks like an exciting project that overlaps some of my interests. I would be interested in developing an additional front end for a language it does not currently support (I'm open to what language). I do not know much about what this entails in regards to what LLVM requires from its
2007 Jul 28
8
[LLVMdev] Web Site Re-Design
I offered to do the web site a couple of weeks ago. Life got in the way temporarily, and it took me a long time to make it look the way that I wanted and to make it look the same in IE6. Anyway, I wanted to get some feedback on what I had done. Some concerns: 1. SSI and JavaScript seem like overkill. Each subproject can have their own look and feel by overriding the CSS
2006 Sep 01
2
[LLVMdev] compiling the full SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode
On 31 Aug 2006, at 23:46, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: >> Bummer. I think I'll contact the NAG support for more info on >> this. Can you >> show me the content of your Makefile.nagfortran? > > It is identical to yours. > >> Also, it is possible to tell make only to compile benchmark X? How >> can I >>
2007 Mar 19
0
[LLVMdev] Google SOC - Idea
Hi Scott, On 18 Mar 2007, at 04:22, Scott Fortmann-Roe wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that LLVM had signed up as a mentoring organization for > Google's summer of code. LLVM looks like an exciting project that > overlaps some of my interests. > > I would be interested in developing an additional front end for a > language it does not currently support (I'm open to
2008 Apr 17
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-ld optimization options
I have been wondering why llvm-ld generates the same code with or without the option "-O5" so I looked at its source (llvm 2.2). And apparently, the options "-On" are accepted but never used! The program runs a fixed set of optimization passes, unless "-disable-opt" is specified. What is the reason for this? If this is intended, then the documentation should say
2008 Apr 17
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-ld optimization options
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, HyperQuantum wrote: > I have been wondering why llvm-ld generates the same code with or without the option "-O5" so I looked at its source (llvm 2.2). And apparently, the options "-On" are accepted but never used! The program runs a fixed set of optimization passes, unless "-disable-opt" is specified. What is the reason for this? If this is
2010 Jul 06
2
[LLVMdev] list of LLVM optimization passes
On Jul 6, 2010, at 10:09 AM, Manuel Llosa wrote: > Dear Kenneth, May I ask you if you are implementing your search within > ctuning framework: ctuning.org/ctuning-cc? No, I'm not. I've built my own framework, and since I don't have any experience with the ctuning framework, I don't intend to start using that. There's little gain in it for me. > The thing is that I
2007 May 29
2
[LLVMdev] Developer Meeting videos
Hi Everyone, I set up a page to host the videos and slides from the meeting, and uploaded all the videos: http://llvm.org/devmtg/2007-05/index.html So far, I only have one set of slides on the page - please send me your slides! :) Also, I'd appreciate it if someone would write a blurb describing an overview of the meeting, etc at the top. Also, Scott, please let me know when it's ok
2008 Jun 03
10
[LLVMdev] Linux x86 testers needed!
All, We are in desperate need of linux x86 testers (32 or 64 bit). If you could set one up, the LLVM project would be very grateful. Right now we have virtually no testers covering this platform. Directions to set up a tester are here: http://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html#nightly These directions could be improved of course. If you have any questions, I will be happy to assist you in
2007 Apr 06
1
[LLVMdev] New Web Pages
Hi Kenneth, On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 08:55 +0200, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > Hi Reid, > > On 06 Apr 2007, at 04:51, Reid Spencer wrote: > > > All, > > > > Just in case you missed the construction of these pages, I thought > > you'd > > like to know about these new ones: > > > > http://llvm.org/DevMtgMay2007.html > > All the latest