similar to: [LLVMdev] Web Server Going Down

The web server is back up! I apologize for the short notice. We appear to have fixed the problem (thanks Anton!). In the future, we will try to provide at least 30 minutes notice (min, but usually more) when shutting down the server. This was a special case because of some subversion tasks did not get taken care of. Thanks for understanding, -Tanya On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Tanya M. Lattner

The svn server is back online (as is the web server). However, there are a few issues remaining: - Doxygen is not updating. - Auto-update of websites not working due to permissions issues. I'll update once these 2 things are working again, but I hope to keep the web/svn server up from now on. If you have problems with committing, please let me know. This should work for people committing

(I apologize if you get multiples of this mail, we are having mailing list issues) FYI..tonight from 10:00PM-12:00AM PDT the web server and subversion access will be down. I suspect that we won't need that entire 2 hour time block, but just plan on not having httpd access during that time. Thanks, Tanya

All, We have some emergency maintenance to do on the server and it will be going offline in the next 10 minutes. I apologize for the short notice regarding this situation. We hope the server will only be down for a short period of time. Thanks, Tanya

> On Apr 6, 2017, at 2:52 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > > On 6 April 2017 at 05:49, Dean Michael Berris <dean.berris at gmail.com> wrote: >> I'll have a look if I can untangle that. >> >> Thanks Renato! > > Well, that didn't last long. Now I remember why last time I fixed > hundreds of warnings on the docs directly

Eric, I apologize for any delay or confusion. From my records/list archives, I saw that Anton had created an account for you on Oct 17th and responded to your email to llvm-admin. I am not sure what happened after that point as I thought the account was done. I just confirmed there is an account for you in bugzilla, so you should be good to go if you reset your password. -Tanya > On Oct 27,

I expect llvm.org to need another 30 minutes of downtime. Thank you for your patience. Thanks, Tanya On Apr 25, 2013, at 10:16 AM, Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> wrote: > Just a reminder that llvm.org will be rebooted in 15 minutes, and will be down for about 30 minutes or less. It will be rebooted a couple times so you might see it come up and go back down, but do not get

Just a reminder that llvm.org will be rebooted in 15 minutes, and will be down for about 30 minutes or less. It will be rebooted a couple times so you might see it come up and go back down, but do not get alarmed. Thanks, Tanya

>> Considering that everyone is managing just fine with cvs, anything >> discussed about the differences between cvs and *X* is not a show stopper. > > I would have used the term "coping just fine" with cvs. Yeah, it works. > But, is it productive? efficient? easy? fast? .. none of those. There > are better alternatives and that's why we're discussing it.

That was easy! :-) The ones I looked are fine, too. Thanks! I think we could get them under docs.llvm.org or something, by just pointing our dns somewhere? Cheers, Renato On 7 Apr 2017 02:10, "Brian Cain" <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Tanya Lattner via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >>

Hi Tanya and everybody, Ty for your support. I too believe it should not be complicated. But I was not being able to do it. For instance, I tried to run this code below: BB->push_back(&(BB->front())); BB->pop_front(); But it did not work (kinda obvious why). Nor this: BB->push_back(BB->begin()); BB->pop_front(); But also did not work. It seams the same

The application period for GSOC has closed! Please read the following information carefully. Upcoming deadlines: April 7 - Organizations update projected slot allocations. April 15th - All student applications must be ranked and assigned a mentor. April 20 - Accepted student proposals announced. Students: Many of your proposals are not complete and you should complete them as soon as

LLVMers, I will be creating the 2.3 release branch today at 9PM PDT. During that time, commit access to SVN will be forbidden. I will send out mail shortly before the branch creation, and once it has been completed. Thanks, Tanya

On May 19, 2008, at 9:13 PM, Razvan Aciu wrote: > I tested this pre-release on MSVC and I noted that none of the > submitted > patches (mine or others) were applied. > So the llvm 2.3 will not compile out of the box in MSVC? > Please provide me with a link to the patch(s) that need to be applied (llvm-commits archive email). I only apply patches that have been sent to me and

What, the deadline is tomorrow?!? The deadline for proposals snuck up on me, and I'm sure many of you forgot as well. Therefore, I am extending the deadline. I have received some great talk proposals, so keep them coming. However, I have very few tutorials, BoFs, posters, or lightening talk proposals. So please, get those proposals in and lets make this year the best developer meeting yet!

Thank you! It seems like new changes in .rst files are picked up quickly now. -- Alex On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 7:33 PM Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > This should all be fixed now. > > Thanks, > Tanya > > > On Feb 14, 2019, at 9:50 AM, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > > Yes, I am working on it. The sub-projects are still having

@Tobias The poly docs build step is still failing, but due to a bug in the particular version of Sphinx used by the www-scripts builder. This seems like something best worked around inside poly. The builds take place hourly and their output is reported on the www-scripts at lists.llvm.org mailing list. On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 12:58 AM, Tobias Grosser <tobias.grosser at inf.ethz.ch > wrote:

This is my patch for MSVC 2008 and it was applied by Chris: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080512/062390.html I tested it and it is ok for the 2.3 release. Razvan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tanya Lattner" <tonic at nondot.org> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 7:40 AM

Hi Tanya, The new type-legalization mode (-promote-elements) which enables vector-select in LLVM (and a nice perf boost for several workloads), is currently disabled because of a _single_ bug in the ARM codegen which makes a few tests fail. If ARM is not a supported target, can I mark these tests as 'XFAIL' and enable vector-select support in LLVM ? Thanks, Nadav -----Original

Just a reminder, please complete your testing by May 21st! Thanks, Tanya ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 00:25:41 -0700 From: Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Subject: 2.3 Pre-release available for testing LLVMers, The 2.3 pre-release is available for testing: