similar to: [LLVMdev] NOTICE: < 12 hours to Subversion Migration

On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Reid Spencer wrote: > I know we've cried wolf before, but the conversion of the LLVM projects' > software to use Subversion instead of CVS *WILL* occur on Friday June > 29th with the following approximate schedule: Great, I'm glad to see this happening. Thanks for making it happen. One request: when the change goes live, please make sure the various

All, I know we've cried wolf before, but the conversion of the LLVM projects' software to use Subversion instead of CVS *WILL* occur on Friday June 29th with the following approximate schedule: * 09:00 CDT (14:00 UTC, 07:00 PDT) - CVS becomes read-only (commits prevented) * 09:05 CDT (14:05 UTC, 07:05 PDT) - Final conversion to SVN starts * 11:45 CDT

Dear All, I need one or more volunteers to try out their nightly testers with the -usesvn option. We're not running on here at the University of Illinois regularly, so if someone could try one of theirs out before tomorrow 9:00 am CDT, I'd be very appreciative. Thanks. -- John T.

All, I've updated the NewNightlyTest.pl script again to fix a bug. If you're running this script, please make a note of the following: * There was a bug that only allowed the script to work with SVN if the -verbose option was also given (yeah, go figure). That's been fixed now. * The script now defaults to checkout from subversion so there is no

Dear LLVMers, The configuration of the subversion software is still incomplete, so we will not be starting the switch over to SVN at 1:00 pm CDT today as planned. I do not know yet when the conversion can be rescheduled. It looks like tomorrow (Tuesday) is the earliest that we can begin the conversion. I'll keep the list updated as I learn more details. -- John T.

Dear All, I'm in the process of completing the final steps of the subversion migration. As part of this process, I need to restart the LLVM web server. If things go according to plan, it should be down for less than 5 minutes. I'll be restarting it in 10 minutes (2:27 pm CDT). -- John T.

On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 17:48 -0600, John Criswell wrote: > Dear All, > > I've just heard that there's been a recent discussion on the IRC channel > about moving the LLVM source repository from CVS to Subversion (SVN) and > that this migration may happen "soon." Yes, its been talked about for ages and its time to do it. We've debated the choice of repositories

Dear All, I've just heard that there's been a recent discussion on the IRC channel about moving the LLVM source repository from CVS to Subversion (SVN) and that this migration may happen "soon." Is such a migration being planned, and if so, what is the timeframe? How will the migration be performed? I and other LLVM users have deadlines in the near future, so we would like to

Dear LLVMers, The first phase of the Subversion conversion is complete. The CVS repository will no longer be available. You will now need to use the SVN server. Directions for getting LLVM from the SVN server can be found in the new Getting Started Guide (http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html). If you run a nightly tester, you should update your LLVM tree from SVN to get the new

For those of you running nightly tests: A new version of the NewNightlyTest.pl script needs to be propagated. This version supports checking LLVM out from Subversion and getting repository history data from Subversion. Unfortunately, it also requires the Date::Parse Perl module which is often not automatically installed. You will need to run cpan to get this installed. Please install this soon as

Dear All, The CVS repository should now be read-only now. It should be safe to checkout files, but you should not be able to commit any changes (for safety, please don't try). We expect the conversion to be done by noon CDT. I should have an update on the status by then. -- John T.

Hi, Two things regarding the new subversion repository :- 1) Can you remove lib/CodeGen/ELF - which was a copy of the 'libelf' GNU library which got partially deleted. 2) Is there any way make the "Win32" Visual Studio 2003 a separate source repository, so we do not have the VS2003 code being distributed on every *nix platform. AND could we also have a Visual Studio 2005

Everyone, We are at long last migrating the xiph.org source repository from to subversion. We've been wanting to do this for some years, but have been waiting for a conversion script that could deal with our creaky old cvs repository. Subversion, although perfectly usable for the past two years, recently announced a stable 1.0 release, and more importantly the major issues with the

Everyone, We are at long last migrating the xiph.org source repository from to subversion. We've been wanting to do this for some years, but have been waiting for a conversion script that could deal with our creaky old cvs repository. Subversion, although perfectly usable for the past two years, recently announced a stable 1.0 release, and more importantly the major issues with the

Everyone, We are at long last migrating the xiph.org source repository from to subversion. We've been wanting to do this for some years, but have been waiting for a conversion script that could deal with our creaky old cvs repository. Subversion, although perfectly usable for the past two years, recently announced a stable 1.0 release, and more importantly the major issues with the

Everyone, We are at long last migrating the xiph.org source repository from to subversion. We've been wanting to do this for some years, but have been waiting for a conversion script that could deal with our creaky old cvs repository. Subversion, although perfectly usable for the past two years, recently announced a stable 1.0 release, and more importantly the major issues with the

Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote: > Dear All, > > according to http://llvm.org/SVNMigration.html the repository migrated to SubVersion (svn) > on june 5th 2007 (almost 10 days ago). > The migration was delayed. The subversion software was supposed to be configured this week by our IT department, but I have not heard from them yet. I've fired off an email to see what the status

Greets. I''m currently trying to install GIT on an RHEL5 box. I''ve tried to both build from source and install via yum. In both instances I continue to receive the error message (full error stack at the end): [code]Error: Missing Dependency: subversion = 1.4.2-2.el5 is needed by package subversion-ruby[/code] If I''m reading this correctly I''m seeing that svn

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:0255 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0255.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: fbcfb2bcf52bf8bbe142eaf4c1ff44b4423c2d1cd9ef5f5e6c6031ac7b0bd84b mod_dav_svn-1.6.11-10.el6_5.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0165 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0165.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 32a3927ae4971b23bc81f9123363306d8d9a5939b139a3c802de82e5b79644bb mod_dav_svn-1.6.11-12.el6_6.i686.rpm