similar to: [LLVMdev] How to call native functions from bytecode run in JIT?

Are you able make calls to well known external functions such as printf? As far as I known, this capability is well tested on x86 / Linux. I am wondering if there is some name mangling issue? Evan On Jun 7, 2007, at 8:38 AM, Jan Rehders wrote: > Hello, > > can anyone help me calling native functions from LLVM-Bytecode > functions run in the JIT? > > I have a program

Hi, I was able to try this on linux again. Unfortunately it doesn't work at all (neither using runFunction nor a CallInst). It simply says function called get5 not known. Calling printf the same way works, though. On linux the function is exported as "get5" from the executable while it is called "_get5" on OS X. I could not spot any other differences.. any

Hi Jan, In gcc for Linux, you have the -rdynamic option that allows an executable to dlsym its symbols. Since llvm use dlsym to find the symbols, you could try with this option. That's what I did. And don't forget to use the C++ name if you compile with C++. Cheers, Nicolas Jan Rehders wrote: > Hi, > > I was able to try this on linux again. Unfortunately it doesn't work

Hi, > Okay. If the function exists in your application's address space > already, > just name the LLVM function the same name as the native function > and the > JIT should find it an do the right thing. This is how it finds > printf and > a variety of other things. You don't need to call addGlobalMapping at > all. Looking at the output of "nm

On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Jan Rehders wrote: >> Jan, how are you doing this? Are you creating an external LLVM >> Function object named "get5", then using EE::addGlobalMapping? If >> 'get5' exists in the address space, why not just let the JIT resolve it >> (which will then create the stub)? > > Yes. I create a Function with matching signature,

Hi, attached is a small testcase I did. It builds two LLVM functions which both call two native functions get5 and get6. The native functions are in the exe and in the dll. On OS X it works like a charm. On Linux none of the two functions can be called. Maybe someone can try them or have a look at it to see if there is something obviously wrong greetings, Jan -------------- next part

On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Jonas Maebe wrote: > On 11 Jun 2007, at 22:35, Jan Rehders wrote: >> It's inside PPCJITInfo::relocate but unfortunately I could not figure >> out anything from the source. It looks like it's calculating new >> addresses for functions which does not make much sense for a native >> function, at all > > On the PPC, unconditional branches

Hi, > If I recall correctly, in Linux you get the message: > > PPCJITInfo.cpp:382: failed assertion `ResultPtr >= -(1 << 23) && > ResultPtr < (1 << 23) && "Relocation out of range!"' > > > Right? But on OS X you don't have this messsage? Not exactly. There seem to be two problems. Your patch fixes one of them: in OS X I

Dear List Members, I need some help about programming in S language. My problem is as follows: I have meteorological data (about rainfall measurement each day from 1989-2002), say like http://www.angelfire.com/ab5/get5/data.rainfall.txt or http://www.angelfire.com/ab5/get5/R.rainfall.txt in a sequence of 0(denoting dry day)'s and 1(denoting wet day)'s. I want to construct a frequency

Hi, > Jan, how are you doing this? Are you creating an external LLVM > Function > object named "get5", then using EE::addGlobalMapping? If 'get5' > exists in > the address space, why not just let the JIT resolve it (which will > then > create the stub)? Yes. I create a Function with matching signature, calling conventions and external linkage

Dear all, I was wondering if there is any way i could do a "Grid Search" on a parameter space using R (as SAS 6.12 and higher can do it) to start the Newton-Gauss Linearization least squares method when i have NO prior information about the parameter. W. N. Venables and B. D. Ripley (2002) "Modern Applied Statistics with S", 4 th ed., page 216-7 has a topic

Hi Jan, If I recall correctly, in Linux you get the message: PPCJITInfo.cpp:382: failed assertion `ResultPtr >= -(1 << 23) && ResultPtr < (1 << 23) && "Relocation out of range!"' Right? But on OS X you don't have this messsage? Here's a temporary fix until I find time to investigate on this: In function PPCISelLowering::LowerCALL,

On 11 Jun 2007, at 22:35, Jan Rehders wrote: > It's inside PPCJITInfo::relocate but unfortunately I could not figure > out anything from the source. It looks like it's calculating new > addresses for functions which does not make much sense for a native > function, at all On the PPC, unconditional branches are limited to 24 bit signed displacements. When you call a function

Hi, > I know nothing about this, but the failed assertion suggests the PPC > code generator can't cope with a constant that's bigger than > expected at > that point. Have you taken a look at PPCJITInfo.cpp:382? It may shed > some light. It's inside PPCJITInfo::relocate but unfortunately I could not figure out anything from the source. It looks like it's

Dear all, For estimating Cobb-Douglad production Function [ Y = ALPHA * (L^(BETA1)) * (K^(BETA2)) ], i want to use nls function (without linearizing it). But how can i get initial values? ------------------------------------ > options(prompt=" R> " ) R> Y <- c(59.6, 63.9, 73.5, 75.6, 77.3, 82.8, 83.6, 84.9, 90.3, 80.5, 73.5, 60.3, 58.2, 64.4, 75.4, 85, 92.7, 85.4,

> Are you able make calls to well known external functions such as > printf? As far as I known, this capability is well tested on x86 / > Linux. Calling printf works at least on OS X (I'm waiting for a reply whether this works on linux). If I call my native function it fails with PPCJITInfo.cpp:382: failed assertion `ResultPtr >= -(1 << 23) && ResultPtr < (1

Dear List Members, I need a bit help about fitting some theoretical distributions (such as geometric, exponential, lognormal or weibull distribution) to the following *dry spell*, *wet spell*, *cycles (Wet-Dry or Dry-Wet)* from my meteorological (daily rainfall) data http://www.angelfire.com/ab5/get5/R.rainfall.txt only for rainy seasen (july - september) of 14 years only:

Dear list, Is there anyway i can make the following formula short by r-programming? CYCLE.n<-c(NA, WET[1]*DRY[1], WET[1]*DRY[2]+WET[2]*DRY[1], WET[1]*DRY[3]+WET[2]*DRY[2]+WET[3]*DRY[1], WET[1]*DRY[4]+WET[2]*DRY[3]+WET[3]*DRY[2]+WET[4]*DRY[1], WET[1]*DRY[5]+WET[2]*DRY[4]+WET[3]*DRY[3]+WET[4]*DRY[2]+WET[5]*DRY[1],

On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 11:14, Francisco Puentes wrote: > Hi, everybody: > Hi Francisco > > I am a beginner with LLVM, in fact today was the first day that I use it. Welcome! > > I have several questions about LLVM: If you haven't already, a good place to start is the Getting Started Guide, at http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/GettingStarted.html > Can I use LLVM to

Using cmake should be the right thing if you'd like to support windows, but it seems that no enough effort on this build system, eg http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=12157 three months passed, I'am I bit familiar with cmake, so if there tasks pending for absence of developer, I'd like to join. cmake is not perfect but it's open, but many improvements maybe merged upstream.