similar to: [LLVMdev] Subversion Conversion Delay

Dear LLVMers, There was a campus wide power outage today at the University of Illinois. It took down most (if not all) computing services, including the LLVM web/subversion server and the mailing list server. Power has since been restored, and it appears that our IT department has gotten the LLVM web and SVN server operating again (I went in earlier this evening to see if the LLVM server

Dear LLVMers, The configuration of the subversion software is still incomplete, so we will not be starting the switch over to SVN at 1:00 pm CDT today as planned. I do not know yet when the conversion can be rescheduled. It looks like tomorrow (Tuesday) is the earliest that we can begin the conversion. I'll keep the list updated as I learn more details. -- John T.

Dear LLVMers, The first phase of the Subversion conversion is complete. The CVS repository will no longer be available. You will now need to use the SVN server. Directions for getting LLVM from the SVN server can be found in the new Getting Started Guide (http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html). If you run a nightly tester, you should update your LLVM tree from SVN to get the new

Török Edwin wrote: > On 2009-11-14 00:57, John Criswell wrote: > >> Dear LLVMers, >> >> We are happy to announce an alpha release of the SAFECode compiler. It >> is now available for download from the LLVM public Subversion >> repository. SAFECode uses a set of analysis passes and program >> transformations to provide strong memory safety

Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote: > Dear All, > > according to http://llvm.org/SVNMigration.html the repository migrated to SubVersion (svn) > on june 5th 2007 (almost 10 days ago). > The migration was delayed. The subversion software was supposed to be configured this week by our IT department, but I have not heard from them yet. I've fired off an email to see what the status

All LLVM Developers: This is your notice that the LLVM project is converting from CVS to Subversion for its software repository. The conversion will happen on June 5th, 2007 unless otherwise notified. Please see http://llvm.org/SVNMigration.html for full details. We had hoped to have the conversion done by now, but a number of factors made it prudent for us to delay for a few more weeks. There

On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Reid Spencer wrote: > I know we've cried wolf before, but the conversion of the LLVM projects' > software to use Subversion instead of CVS *WILL* occur on Friday June > 29th with the following approximate schedule: Great, I'm glad to see this happening. Thanks for making it happen. One request: when the change goes live, please make sure the various

On Mar 8, 2009, at 10:55 PM, John Criswell wrote: > Dear LLVMers, > > There was a campus wide power outage today at the University of > Illinois. It took down most (if not all) computing services, > including > the LLVM web/subversion server and the mailing list server. > > Power has since been restored, and it appears that our IT department > has > gotten the

All, I know we've cried wolf before, but the conversion of the LLVM projects' software to use Subversion instead of CVS *WILL* occur on Friday June 29th with the following approximate schedule: * 09:00 CDT (14:00 UTC, 07:00 PDT) - CVS becomes read-only (commits prevented) * 09:05 CDT (14:05 UTC, 07:05 PDT) - Final conversion to SVN starts * 11:45 CDT

Dear All, The Subversion Migration is beginning now. CVS commit access will be disabled. -- John T.

Dear All, Just a reminder that the maintenance will be commencing now. -- John T. John Criswell wrote: > Dear LLVMers and Clangers, > > We'll be doing some maintenance on the LLVM repository on Tuesday, Sept. > 14 (tomorrow). There were some files committed to the repository that > we believe need to be removed from both mainline, the branches, and the > revision

Dear All, according to http://llvm.org/SVNMigration.html the repository migrated to SubVersion (svn) on june 5th 2007 (almost 10 days ago). Did the migration happened as expected? http://llvm.org/releases/ still mention CVS, and nothing on http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#checkout suggest to switch to svn instead of cvs. What is the current best way to download the latest snapshot:

Dear LLVMers, I will be rebooting the LLVM server in 5 minutes (3:35 pm Central Time). The system is experiencing unusually high load, no other remedies have lowered the load, and we think a reboot will fix it. Please make sure any commits to the LLVM repository are done within the next 5 minutes. Thanks, and sorry for the inconvenience. -- John T.

Dear LLVMers and Clangers, We'll be doing some maintenance on the LLVM repository on Tuesday, Sept. 14 (tomorrow). There were some files committed to the repository that we believe need to be removed from both mainline, the branches, and the revision history. The SVN repository will go *off-line* at 7:00 am Central Daylight Savings time on Tuesday. Please do not make any commits after

On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 17:48 -0600, John Criswell wrote: > Dear All, > > I've just heard that there's been a recent discussion on the IRC channel > about moving the LLVM source repository from CVS to Subversion (SVN) and > that this migration may happen "soon." Yes, its been talked about for ages and its time to do it. We've debated the choice of repositories

Dear All, I've just heard that there's been a recent discussion on the IRC channel about moving the LLVM source repository from CVS to Subversion (SVN) and that this migration may happen "soon." Is such a migration being planned, and if so, what is the timeframe? How will the migration be performed? I and other LLVM users have deadlines in the near future, so we would like to

Dear All, The LLVM web server is up and running, but we're still working on some subversion configuration issues. The server may go up and down intermittently as we try configuration changes over the next half hour. Sorry for the inconvenience. -- John T.

John Criswell wrote: > Dear All, > > Just a reminder that the maintenance will be commencing now. > Also, I managed to set things up so that you can use svn diff and svn up but not svn commit (I basically disabled commit access for everyone for the time being). -- John T. > -- John T. > > John Criswell wrote: > >> Dear LLVMers and Clangers, >>

LLVMers, The oversight group has been kicking around the idea of getting a better version control system than CVS. The problem is, we're not quite sure what "better" means. So, we thought we'd ask your opinions. There are three options, unless someone strongly advocates another solution: 1. Stay with CVS 2. Use Subversion 3. Use arch Some of the things we're trying to

Due to an error in the configuration of the mirroring tool we are using to mirror the repositories from our internal commit server to the public read-only mirror, the revision numbers were not being properly kept in sync (so rev 14381 on the internal server was not the same as on the mirror). This problem has just been corrected, but it required rebuilding the repositories on the mirror server