Displaying 20 results from an estimated 11000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] llvm-test and FORTRAN"
2007 May 14
2
[LLVMdev] FORTRAN compiler status?
Dear LLVMers,
Does anyone know what the latest is w.r.t a FORTRAN front-end for
LLVM? Is anyone expecting to have typical f90/f95 programs compiling to
LLVM this year, or next? (I'm aware of the "NAG hack" and various other
f2c-type approaches, but they give me a strange feeling in my tummy.)
Duraid
2005 Nov 04
1
[LLVMdev] llvm-test configure problem
>> Any idea what I am doing wrong? :)
>
> Nothing. The test is coded incorrectly. Or at least the shell being used
> doesn't like it. The "bad substitution" message comes from the shell
> executing the configure script while its trying to figure out how to access
> the f2c program. I take it you're running this on a sparc machine. The
> logic seems
2005 Nov 03
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-test configure problem
Tanya Lattner wrote:
>
> Following the instructions here:
> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/TestingGuide.html#run
>
> I get an error running configure in the llvm-test directory.
>
> ./configure
> --with-llvmgccdir=/localhome/tbrethou/cfrontend/sparc/llvm-gcc/
> --with-f2c=/home/vadve/shared/localtools/sparc
> --with-llvmsrc=/localhome/tbrethou/llvm
>
2005 Nov 07
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM 1.6 Release Branch
Tanya Lattner wrote:
>
>>> Everything builds fine on sparc. The configure script needs to be
>>> fixed though (see previous email).
>>
>>
>> I'm not getting the error with the configure script (on Kain, anyway).
>> I've tried it with --with-f2c and with f96 (NAG Fortran compiler) in
>> and out of my $PATH.
>
>
> I get the
2007 May 14
0
[LLVMdev] FORTRAN compiler status?
Hi Duraid,
> Does anyone know what the latest is w.r.t a FORTRAN front-end for
> LLVM? Is anyone expecting to have typical f90/f95 programs compiling to
> LLVM this year, or next? (I'm aware of the "NAG hack" and various other
> f2c-type approaches, but they give me a strange feeling in my tummy.)
support for Fortran will be much easier once LLVM rebases itself
2005 Nov 07
4
[LLVMdev] LLVM 1.6 Release Branch
Tanya Lattner wrote:
>
> Everything builds fine on sparc. The configure script needs to be fixed
> though (see previous email).
I'm not getting the error with the configure script (on Kain, anyway).
I've tried it with --with-f2c and with f96 (NAG Fortran compiler) in and
out of my $PATH.
Can you verify that the configure script works for you without the
--with-f2c option?
2006 Aug 30
2
[LLVMdev] compiling the full SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode
Hello LLVM-people,
I've been trying (on and off) to compile the _full_ SPEC CPU2000
benchmark suite to LLVM bytecode. The biggest problem
I'm facing is the Fortran benchmarks, for which some partial support
is already available it seems (using f2c).
Unfortunately the f2c compiler only allows the translation of
Fortran-77 programs to C code (which is then compiled using llvm-gcc).
2005 Nov 07
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM 1.6 Release Branch
>> Everything builds fine on sparc. The configure script needs to be fixed
>> though (see previous email).
>
> I'm not getting the error with the configure script (on Kain, anyway). I've
> tried it with --with-f2c and with f96 (NAG Fortran compiler) in and out of my
> $PATH.
I get the error with and without the --with-f2c option. I never used the
NAG Fotran
2007 May 15
2
[LLVMdev] FORTRAN compiler status?
I just noticed this - I can't promise any particular amount of TLC, but
I'll certainly be giving the Fortran front-end some attention as soon as
LLVM moves to gcc 4.2.
For future reference, does anyone know of a good free Fortran compiler
test suite?
Cheers,
-mike
On 5/14/07, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
> Hi Duraid,
>
> > Does anyone know what the
2011 Nov 23
1
[LLVMdev] Follow-up questions after successful upgrade to LLVM 3.0rc4
In response to:
> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:24:16 +0100
> From: Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr<mailto:baldrick at free.fr>>
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Follow-up questions after successful upgrade to
> LLVM 3.0rc4
> To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu<mailto:llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
> Hi Kevin,
>> Since I don't have llvm-gcc installed, I tried to do the
2005 Nov 07
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM 1.6 Release Branch
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, John Criswell wrote:
> Tanya Lattner wrote:
>> Everything builds fine on sparc. The configure script needs to be fixed
>> though (see previous email).
>
> I'm not getting the error with the configure script (on Kain, anyway). I've
> tried it with --with-f2c and with f96 (NAG Fortran compiler) in and out of my
> $PATH.
>
> Can you
2006 Aug 30
0
[LLVMdev] compiling the full SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote:
> I've been trying (on and off) to compile the _full_ SPEC CPU2000 benchmark
> suite to LLVM bytecode. The biggest problem
> I'm facing is the Fortran benchmarks, for which some partial support is
> already available it seems (using f2c).
ok.
> Unfortunately the f2c compiler only allows the translation of Fortran-77
>
2011 Jan 12
1
[LLVMdev] About test suits
I have built and configured the test suits as told at
http://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html#testsuite.
The llvm is built with configuration:
SRC_DIR/configure --prefix=INS_DIR --enable-debug-runtime
--disable-optimized --enable-debug-symbols --enable-assertions
This configuration is used again in the re-configure process. However, after
the re-configure process, the following "make"
2005 Nov 03
4
[LLVMdev] llvm-test configure problem
Following the instructions here:
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/TestingGuide.html#run
I get an error running configure in the llvm-test directory.
./configure
--with-llvmgccdir=/localhome/tbrethou/cfrontend/sparc/llvm-gcc/
--with-f2c=/home/vadve/shared/localtools/sparc
--with-llvmsrc=/localhome/tbrethou/llvm
--with-llvmobj=/localhome/tbrethou/llvm
Error:
[cut lots of config output]
checking
2015 Nov 12
2
Building SPEC CPU2006 Fortran benchmarks with llvm
Hello,
I have built llvm with some added Machine Function Passes and I am trying
to use it to build the SPEC CPU2006 benchmarks. I am using llvm test-suite
to build the benchmarks. I configured the test-suite with "--with-f2c" but
still none of the fortran benchmarks are built or compiled. I tried running
simple and nightly tests. Kindly let me know if I am missing some steps and
if not
2006 Aug 30
2
[LLVMdev] compiling the full SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode
Hi Chris,
>
> I use NAG with llvm-gcc4. What sort of errors do you get? Did you
> configure llvm-test with the appropriate flags to find it?
>
Yes, I did. llvm-test is configured as follows: (in /work/LLVM/1.8/
llvm/project/llvm-test):
./configure --with-spec2000=/work/SPEC_CPU2000_1.3_src/benchspec --
without-f2c --with-f95-bin=/work/NAG_f95/bin --with-f95-lib=/work/
1998 May 20
2
libraries; Fortran / -lf2c / Slackware woes
Jim,
you should ask questions like these on R-devel.
There are more proficient Linux gurus on there than me [that's why I CC:].
>>>>> "Jim" == Jim Lindsey <jlindsey@luc.ac.be> writes:
Jim> Martin, Here is an additional problem with my libraries: the
Jim> Kalman filtering, written in Fortran, uses complex arithmetic.
Jim> On my Red Hat 5,
1997 Aug 21
2
R-alpha: thoughts on batch and fortran
Batch:
For me, batch in its present state is broken and useless. My primary
need for batch is to produce a final output file of a session after I
have worked out a sequence of procedures. I save my instructions in a
file that I can source, then run it in batch to have a copy of input
and output together. (If there was a log file (or dribble), this
problem would be solved.) At present, there are
2004 May 07
1
Fortran compiler dependency missing in gentoo ebuild script (PR#6862)
Full_Name: Markus Cozowicz
Version: 1.9.0
OS: Gentoo Linux
Submission from: (NULL) (81.223.31.120)
Fortran compiler dependency missing in gentoo ebuild script
Workaround: emerge f2c
2000 Jun 19
2
fortran compile problem with R-1.1.0
Hello List,
Knowing I would eventually need to ask for help on the list, I've held
off my thanks and congratulations on the 1.+ releases of R. I am amazed
at the dedication of the R-core team, and do add my applause and thanks.
I've had a compile problem with the latest version which has not
occurred before. I'm compiling under:
platform sparc-sun-solaris2.6
arch sparc