similar to: [LLVMdev] Developer Meeting videos

Hi Chris, On 29 May 2007, at 19:15, Chris Lattner wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > I set up a page to host the videos and slides from the meeting, and > uploaded all the videos: > http://llvm.org/devmtg/2007-05/index.html Wow, thanks! That was quicker than I expected... I will be watching every one of these in the next couple of days. One minor detail: the last video (Feedback),

Hi all, I did a performance test of two real applications (FFMPEG and GTK) on ARM. For more details see: http://laurovenancio.wordpress.com/2007/08/07/llvm-perf-tests/ Lauro

Hi Lauro, On 14 Aug 2007, at 01:10, Lauro Ramos Venancio wrote: > Hi all, > > I did a performance test of two real applications (FFMPEG and GTK) on > ARM. For more details see: > http://laurovenancio.wordpress.com/2007/08/07/llvm-perf-tests/ Could you give me some more information about the applications you compiled and ran? Where can I obtain source codes, which input did

I have been wondering why llvm-ld generates the same code with or without the option "-O5" so I looked at its source (llvm 2.2). And apparently, the options "-On" are accepted but never used! The program runs a fixed set of optimization passes, unless "-disable-opt" is specified. What is the reason for this? If this is intended, then the documentation should say

On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, HyperQuantum wrote: > I have been wondering why llvm-ld generates the same code with or without the option "-O5" so I looked at its source (llvm 2.2). And apparently, the options "-On" are accepted but never used! The program runs a fixed set of optimization passes, unless "-disable-opt" is specified. What is the reason for this? If this is

All, We are in desperate need of linux x86 testers (32 or 64 bit). If you could set one up, the LLVM project would be very grateful. Right now we have virtually no testers covering this platform. Directions to set up a tester are here: http://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html#nightly These directions could be improved of course. If you have any questions, I will be happy to assist you in

Hello, On Jun 3, 2008, at 08:52 , Tanya Lattner wrote: > All, > > We are in desperate need of linux x86 testers (32 or 64 bit). If you > could set one up, the LLVM project would be very grateful. Right now > we have virtually no testers covering this platform. I think I might be able to set up a nightly tester for Linux x86 (32- bit). Although I've been following LLVM for

I just noticed this - I can't promise any particular amount of TLC, but I'll certainly be giving the Fortran front-end some attention as soon as LLVM moves to gcc 4.2. For future reference, does anyone know of a good free Fortran compiler test suite? Cheers, -mike On 5/14/07, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Duraid, > > > Does anyone know what the

On Tue, 29 May 2007, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > One minor detail: the last video (Feedback), so have number 15 > instead of 14 (unless that is intentional). Fixed, thanks, -chris >> >> So far, I only have one set of slides on the page - please send me >> your >> slides! :) Also, I'd appreciate it if someone would write a blurb >> describing an overview of

Hi Everyone, A website refresh is long overdue, for a couple reasons: 1. The webpage hasn't changed substantially for years, but the project obviously has :) 2. The current web site is very cluttered. 3. The current site does not convey what LLVM is to new people very well. 4. The current site does not support "subprojects" at all. As such, I put together a prototype for a new

Hi folks, We recently generated some data that seemed interesting enough to share here. This is a comparison between compilers that ignores the performance of the generated code and focuses only on compiler correctness. volatile checksum errors errors avr-gcc-3.4 1.879% 0.378% avr-gcc-4.1 0.037% 0.256% avr-gcc-4.2

In terms of promoting LLVM, it might be nice to actually post those on a site like youTube, where it might get more exposure -- I think that they have a 'developer' or 'software' sub-genre (like the 'Google-talk' series). -Gabe On May 29, 2007, at 3:54 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 29 May 2007, Kenneth Hoste wrote: >> One minor detail: the last video

On 31 Aug 2006, at 19:13, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > >> When I adjust the settings in Makefile.nagfortran as follows, I'm >> able to get bytecode file for lucas, galgel and facerec, but make >> still quits with an error (after generating >> bytecode files for 7 (out of 26) benchmarks. >> >> Also, the file

On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > Bummer. I think I'll contact the NAG support for more info on this. Can you > show me the content of your Makefile.nagfortran? It is identical to yours. > Also, it is possible to tell make only to compile benchmark X? How can I > enforce this? Go into the directory for that benchmark, then run 'make' or whatever. -Chris --

Hi Scott, On 18 Mar 2007, at 04:22, Scott Fortmann-Roe wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that LLVM had signed up as a mentoring organization for > Google's summer of code. LLVM looks like an exciting project that > overlaps some of my interests. > > I would be interested in developing an additional front end for a > language it does not currently support (I'm open to

Hi, I noticed that LLVM had signed up as a mentoring organization for Google's summer of code. LLVM looks like an exciting project that overlaps some of my interests. I would be interested in developing an additional front end for a language it does not currently support (I'm open to what language). I do not know much about what this entails in regards to what LLVM requires from its

On 31 Aug 2006, at 23:46, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: >> Bummer. I think I'll contact the NAG support for more info on >> this. Can you >> show me the content of your Makefile.nagfortran? > > It is identical to yours. > >> Also, it is possible to tell make only to compile benchmark X? How >> can I >>

Hi Kenneth, On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 08:55 +0200, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > Hi Reid, > > On 06 Apr 2007, at 04:51, Reid Spencer wrote: > > > All, > > > > Just in case you missed the construction of these pages, I thought > > you'd > > like to know about these new ones: > > > > http://llvm.org/DevMtgMay2007.html > > All the latest

All, Just in case you missed the construction of these pages, I thought you'd like to know about these new ones: http://llvm.org/DevMtgMay2007.html All the latest details on the 25th May Developer's meeting. Page modified daily! http://llvm.org/Users.html A list of organizations using LLVM. If you want on this page send the details here. http://llvm.org/SVNMigration.html

Hello, I'm trying to compile to SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode, using the llvm-test harness. I have tried this using: - both the 1.7 and 1.8 releases, without succes (and running into the same problems in both releases) - both the gcc3 and gcc4 frontends I'm working on Linux/x86. LLVM is configured using: ./configure --prefix=/path/to/bin/dir and compiled using gmake; gmake