similar to: [LLVMdev] regarding LLVM

Hi All, I have a query regarding LLVM,Can LLVM IR can restore high level information of base language. Thanks and Regards, Manish On 5/18/07, manish <manishagg22 at gmail.com> wrote: > >

Adapt the globbing part from the old --remote-path work previously proposed for sysprep [1], allowing --delete to perform globbing when deleting paths. [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2013-October/msg00045.html --- sysprep/sysprep_operation_delete.ml | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/sysprep/sysprep_operation_delete.ml

On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 04:19:12PM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > Adapt the globbing part from the old --remote-path work previously > proposed for sysprep [1], allowing --delete to perform globbing when > deleting paths. > > [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2013-October/msg00045.html > --- > sysprep/sysprep_operation_delete.ml | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3

I truly get the bytecode file for each souce file,but can I use llvm-link to link them into a whole-program one automatically through some scripts? > > Message: 27 > Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:16:10 +0200 > From: ?scar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Replace gcc with llvm-gcc??? > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Message-ID: <87vdjlnh2d.fsf at

Ok, less talk and more action. I just implemented proper Microsoft ML/MASM support. It probably has a few rough edges, so if anyone wants to try it out please do and let me know if you encounter any problems. Note that you cannot take a bytecode file created by llvm-gcc on Unix, move it to Windows, translate it to Intel syntax assembler, assemble it with ML and expect it to work.

Hi, I am looking for the information w.r.t domstats command line option of virsh tool. 1> This command line option is available with which version of libvirt. 2> How to get Guest's disk related information in case storage pool does not exist on host. Thanks and Regards, Manish

Just set llvm-ld as the default ld . Such as LD = llvm-ld in makefile, if it's not working, then there is no solution 2009/9/15, zhunan <zhunansjtu at gmail.com>: > I truly get the bytecode file for each souce file,but can I use > llvm-link to link them into a whole-program one automatically through > some scripts? > > >> >> Message: 27 >> Date: Tue, 15

Hi ALL, Can anyone please tell me how LLVM part interact with GCC FE( i mean parser and lexer). I want to ask how and where tree data structures are converted into llvm data structures. Thanks and Regards, Manish

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 08:14:11PM -0500, svn-commits@oss.oracle.com wrote: > Author: manish > Signed-off-by: mfasheh > Date: 2005-05-16 20:14:10 -0500 (Mon, 16 May 2005) > New Revision: 2251 > > Modified: > trunk/fs/ocfs2/namei.c > Log: > Cosmetic coding style fix While we're fixing at style issues, could you please remove all the typedefs for struct types?

The README at the location shared by John says "DSA is undergoing significant changes and may not be entirely stable or correct. See lib/DSA/README" So, I was wondering from where should one pick the code. Although I will start my analysis and see how results turn out to be. But any comments on this line will be helpful. Thanks Manish On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Manish Gupta

> Ok, less talk and more action. I just implemented proper Microsoft > ML/MASM support. It probably has a few rough edges, so if anyone wants to > try it out please do and let me know if you encounter any problems. > > Note that you cannot take a bytecode file created by llvm-gcc on Unix, > move it to Windows, translate it to Intel syntax assembler, assemble it > with ML

罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) wrote: > Just set llvm-ld as the default ld . > Such as LD = llvm-ld in makefile, if it's not working, then there is no solution > Some Makefiles use the C compiler (e.g., gcc or llvm-gcc) as the linker. For such Makefiles, the above will not work because llvm-gcc runs ld. What you need is a linker that can link LLVM bitcode files together. If that is the case,

Even if ocamlopt is available, always build a bytecode version of ‘common/mlstdutils’. Furthermore, because this library is pure OCaml, we should not be using ‘ocamlmklib’. We should use ‘ocaml{c,opt} -a’ instead. This doesn't make any difference for native code, but for bytecode it was building a broken library. The original reason for making this change is because the generator is always

Even if ocamlopt is available, always build a bytecode version of ‘common/mlstdutils’. Furthermore, because this library is pure OCaml, we should not be using ‘ocamlmklib’. We should use ‘ocaml{c,opt} -a’ instead. This doesn't make any difference for native code, but for bytecode it was building a broken library. The original reason for making this change is because the generator is always

On Thu, Jan 17, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 05:51:53PM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 14, Olaf Hering wrote: > > > This is a first attempt to build libguestfs with just a ocaml bytecode > > > compiler. The three tools written in ocaml will be build only when an > > > ocamlopt compiler is available. > > Here is a more

On Thursday, 13 July 2017 16:38:14 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Even if ocamlopt is available, always build a bytecode version of > ‘common/mlstdutils’. > > Furthermore, because this library is pure OCaml, we should not be > using ‘ocamlmklib’. We should use ‘ocaml{c,opt} -a’ instead. This > doesn't make any difference for native code, but for bytecode it was >

Hi, I met some difficult in reading ssh/sshd souce code, I want to find out how the command that user input in client is executed on the server. I only found out the process_input function put the command in a buffer,but can not find how it is executed. Could you please help me on that? Thank you very much. B Rgds, Kexin

Hi Sakharam, I see 2 potential issues with what you are doing. 1. ./opus_demo -e voip 48000 2 16 music_orig.wav testcase30.opus in above command, "16" for bits/sec seems too low. I'm no audio expert, but just cant convince myself you can get any reasonable audio data with 16 bits/sec. FYI, I was able to encode and decode with 16 bits/sec, but when I played the decode file with

Hi All, Need Help ! I am interested testing opus codec encoding decoding qaulity. for this have complied opus code codec from souce. After compiling i got opus_demo app. for Encoding i followed below steps: 1) Reference file used music_orig.wav (http://www.opus-codec.org/examples/samples/music_orig.wav) Number of samples : 4358219 (90.8 s) 2015-04-13 10:40:07 UTC Sampling