similar to: [LLVMdev] how to dump data stuctures of llvm in llvm-gcc

Hi All, I have a query regarding LLVM,Can LLVM IR can restore high level information of base language. Thanks and Regards, Manish On 5/18/07, manish <manishagg22 at gmail.com> wrote: > >

Hi ALL, Can anyone please tell me how LLVM part interact with GCC FE( i mean parser and lexer). I want to ask how and where tree data structures are converted into llvm data structures. Thanks and Regards, Manish

Reid Spencer wrote: >Yes, that's right! > >In fact, shortly the process of doing that will get easier with the >llvmc (compiler driver) tool that I'm working on. You write your >compiler to generate either bytecode or LLVM assembly and a > > Does that mean the front end must decide between emiting bytecode for interpretting/JITing and LLVM assembly for native

I'am a very fresh R user and I'd like to know how I could create such structures. I saw R was objects-oriented but I can not find any doccumentation on about how to build my hown ojects. Thanks.

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

Hello All, I am developing a JRuby on Rails 3 application. Standard stuff. I am facing problems getting autotest to run. Here''s the trace: % autotest loading autotest/rails_rspec2 bundle exec /Users/manish/Foo/Foo-Server/jruby-1.5.2/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-core-2.0.0.beta.22/bin/rspec

On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 10:35:02AM +1200, Peter Ashford wrote: > Does that mean the front end must decide between emiting bytecode for > interpretting/JITing and LLVM assembly for native compilation? You > can't emit the one kind of output for either end target (interpretted > bytecode or native compilation)? Not at all, there's only one version of LLVM IR, but it can

Even after all the sequence of commands below bit-code is not showing any effect of loop-unrolling *manish at manish:~/Test2$ llvm-gcc-4.2 -O2 -emit-llvm Hello.c -c -o Hello.bc* *manish at manish:~/Test2$ opt-2.8 -loops Hello.bc -o Hello1.bc* *manish at manish:~/Test2$ opt-2.8 -loopsimplify Hello1.bc -o Hello2.bc* *manish at manish:~/Test2$ opt-2.8 -indvars Hello2.bc -o Hello3.bc* *manish at

1. You should run the passes in the same opt command, for passes like loops which is an analysis pass provides results to the following passes. 2. You can pass a -debug flag to opt to see the some debugging info. 3. I tried this opt -mem2reg -loops -loopsimplify -loop-unroll -unroll-count=3 -debug loop.o -o tt.bc and got this message. Loop Size = 14 Can't unroll; loop not terminated by

On Monday 29 November 2004 19:39, Chris Lattner wrote: > > > Alternatively, if you don't want to do that, you can build mem2reg into > > > your pass if it works better. To do this, your pass needs to > > > 'addRequired' DominatorTree and DominatorFrontier, then use the > > > interfaces exposed through > > >

Hi Renato, Thanks! I will make sure the patches are posted to the correct mailing list. Manish On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Renato Golin Linaro < renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > Hi Manish, > > Thanks for the patch, I'll check and commit. > > cheers, > --renato > > PS: Patches are normally sent to llvm-commit list, unless they require a > lot of

Misha Brukman wrote: >On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 10:35:02AM +1200, Peter Ashford wrote: > > >>Does that mean the front end must decide between emiting bytecode for >>interpretting/JITing and LLVM assembly for native compilation? You >>can't emit the one kind of output for either end target (interpretted >>bytecode or native compilation)? >>

The README at the location shared by John says "DSA is undergoing significant changes and may not be entirely stable or correct. See lib/DSA/README" So, I was wondering from where should one pick the code. Although I will start my analysis and see how results turn out to be. But any comments on this line will be helpful. Thanks Manish On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Manish Gupta

Hi all, How to print the analysis results using 'opt' command? I tried using the below command for my *module.ll* file *opt -analyze -memdep module.ll* * * But it's printing Printing analysis 'Memory Dependence Analysis' for function 'main': Pass::print not implemented for pass: 'Memory Dependence Analysis'! Printing analysis 'Memory Dependence

On 8/4/11 2:45 PM, Manish Gupta wrote: > Hey John, > > Yes this is what I am looking for. I wrote a code as I described in my > first mail and I am getting desired result except when the chain > encounters load instruction (you have also mentioned the that u skip > loads). Okay. Just out of curiosity, is your static slice local (stopping at function arguments) or

Hi Manish, Thanks for the patch, I'll check and commit. cheers, --renato PS: Patches are normally sent to llvm-commit list, unless they require a lot of discussion. On 15 January 2013 14:52, Manish Verma <manish.avtaar at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Transform/LoopStrengthReduction/post-inc-icmpzero.ll was failing for > clang-native-arm-cortex-a9 build-bot configuration.

On Aug 24, 2007, at 1:52 PM, Holger Schurig wrote: > Is llvmc meant for compilation? > I'm not sure what the status of llvmc is (is anyone working on it?), but I don't believe it was ready for real use or was finished. If you would like to work on it, patches are welcomed! Thanks, Tanya > $ llvmc -c a.c -o a.o > /usr/src/llvm/dist/etc/llvm/c:55: Error: Expecting output

On 12/19/2017 03:57 PM, Manish Jain wrote: > > > On 12/20/17 01:45, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Manish Jain wrote: >>> >>> On 12/19/17 22:11, Manish Jain wrote: >>>> On 12/19/17 22:07, Jonathan Billings wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 02:54:36PM +0000, Manish Jain wrote: >>>>>> I uninstalled the old TV, and

On 12/19/2017 02:57 PM, Manish Jain wrote: > > > On 12/20/17 01:45, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Manish Jain wrote: >>> >>> On 12/19/17 22:11, Manish Jain wrote: >>>> On 12/19/17 22:07, Jonathan Billings wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 02:54:36PM +0000, Manish Jain wrote: >>>>>> I uninstalled the old TV, and

Thanks Everyone for the info. I am planning to work with DSA on llvm-2.9. Hope it is working as John mentioned. Manish On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 7:06 AM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu>wrote: > On 9/19/11 9:12 PM, Manish Gupta wrote: > > Dear All, > > I am curious to know the reason for removal of andersen pointer analysis. > Is it because of some issues? We