similar to: [LLVMdev] Instruction::getNext and Instruction::getPrev are private

Thanks Antont and Gabor.. I will use the iterator instead.. On 5/11/07, Anton Korobeynikov <asl at math.spbu.ru> wrote: > Hello, Ferad. > > > I switched to the upcoming version 2.0 branch and porting my code from > > 1.9. Thanks there is not a lot to do. I found that > > Instruction::getNext and Instruction::getPrev are private. Is this > > intentional? >

Hi Ferad! the change has been made with <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of- Mon-20070416/047931.html> You have to use iterators now and "operator ++" etc. Hope this helps, cheers, Gabor

I may be mistaken as I just took a quick look, but in ilist_node the function "getPrevNode()" actually calls a method on the previous node: NodeTy *getPrevNode() { NodeTy *Prev = this->getPrev(); // Check for sentinel. if (!Prev->getNext()) return 0; return Prev; } http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/ilist__node_8h_source.html#l00058 Try checking if

Hi, I tried to compile the GCC front end of LLVM in a 16 CPU SMP machine with 64bit intel xeon CPUs. I tried with (GCC 4.1.0, 4.1.1, 4.1.2 versions). The LLVM compiles perfectly but when compiling the gcc front end the compiler crashes with a segmentation fault by reporting for memory leakages. Probably this is for the GCC's mailing list, but decided to ask if you know anything more about

GCC 4.1.x series is known not to compile LLVM. Its is well documented, avoid GCC 4.1. Aaron ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ferad Zyulkyarov" <feradz at gmail.com> To: <LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 10:38 PM Subject: [LLVMdev] gcc 4.1* carashes compiling llvm-gcc > Hi, > > I tried to compile the GCC front end of LLVM in a 16 CPU

Hi Anton, > What's the version of binutils you're using? I've seen such messages > with 2.16 series, but they were only warnings... The version of binutils is 2.17 By the way. I will use the opportunity to ask you again :) I tried to compile with gcc 4.0.4. It successfully compile LLVM but fails compiling LLVM's gcc front end. The problem is architectural 32 and 64 bit.

Hi, I try to compile LLVM and the GCC frontend for LLVM. The steps that I follow are first to compile LLVM and later to compile GCC front end. I tried to compile LLVM 1.8, 1.9 releases and the CVS versions. I tried to compile with different GCC compilers 3.4.0, 4.1.2 and 4.2.0 GCC compilers 3.4.0 and 4.2.0 fail compiling LLVM sources. GCC 4.1.2 works. I cannot compile GCC front end. When I

Hi, I will try to explain by giving an example. Let's say that I have an intrinsic: int llvm.myintrinsic(int) I have a function: int myintrinsic_handler(int) When %var = call int %llvm.myintrinsic( int %arg ) is met in the code, I want the code generator put in its place: a call to function "myintrinsic_handler" (i.e. %var = call int %myintrinsic_handler( int %arg ) ) or

Hi All, I have just started using LLVM . i am facing a issue while using ilist container. Here is a struct with ilist container as its one element. typedef ilist<Instruction *> InstListType; struct list_node { int Impact; InstListType InstList; }; list_node

Hi all, I am finding a SEGFAULT in one of my passes when using getPrevNode on an instruction that is the only one in a BasicBlock. I was expecting getPrevNode to return 0 in that case (as per docs), but it breaks. I guess the code in in ilist_node.h: NodeTy *getPrevNode() { NodeTy *Prev = this->getPrev(); // Check for sentinel. if (!Prev->getNext()) return 0; return Prev; }

Hello, Ferad. > `.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN4llvm12SCEVExpander6expandEPNS_4SCEVE' referenced > in section `.rodata' of > /home/ferad/llvm/llvm-obj/Release/lib/libLLVMAnalysis.a(ScalarEvolutionExpander.o): > defined in discarded section > `.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN4llvm12SCEVExpander6expandEPNS_4SCEVE' of >

On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Ferad Zyulkyarov wrote: > I will try to explain by giving an example. > Let's say that I have an intrinsic: int llvm.myintrinsic(int) > I have a function: int myintrinsic_handler(int) > When > %var = call int %llvm.myintrinsic( int %arg ) > is met in the code, I want the code generator put in its place: a call > to function >

Hi Ferad, On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 19:48 +0200, Ferad Zyulkyarov wrote: > Hi, > > I want to ask for a small help for creating an instruction that calls > e member method of an object. I suppose that this is not a headache > but I am impatient in learning :) I would be very thankful if you can > show me an example snippet code that does this in LLVM. Below is > described my

Hi, > > I want to implement a new intrinsic in llvm that will denote a > > parallel section within a function. > > Can you explain what you mean by a parallel section within a function? I want to see how OpenMP's parallel fit in the LLVM architecture, is it easy to implement or not. GCC is too heavy platform to work on.. Ferad -- Ferad Zyulkyarov Barcelona Supercomputing

Hi, I want to implement a new intrinsic in llvm that will denote a parallel section within a function. I followed the documentation for extending llvm (http://llvm.org/docs/ExtendingLLVM.html) but there is something about the working mechanism that is not clear for me. 1. Why do we have to add support for the C backend? Is this only necessary to transform the llvm assembly (bytecode) into C code

Yes, you I read that in the docs. Do you have a preferred gcc version that you would suggest me to work best. Unfortunately, version 3.4.2 that you suggest in your docs fails in compilation too. Thanks, Ferad -- Ferad Zyulkyarov Barcelona Supercomputing Center

Hi, I want to ask for a small help for creating an instruction that calls e member method of an object. I suppose that this is not a headache but I am impatient in learning :) I would be very thankful if you can show me an example snippet code that does this in LLVM. Below is described my case. Let's say I have a class TestClass class TestClass { int testMethod(int a); } and I want to

Hi LLVM, I would like to apologize to all LLVM readers for receiving an inappropriate message from LLVM mail list originating from my mail account. Today I was acknowledged by the moderators of other mail lists for posting inappropriate material CCed also to people who I know. I suppose that my e-mail account was cracked and now I am tracing the logs. Once again, sorry for this inconvenience.

On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Ferad Zyulkyarov wrote: >> IntrinsicLowering already does this. It lets you lower intrinsics to >> arbitrary LLVM calls, including calls to external functions. > > I will try to do that in IntrinscLowering class. May you point me an > intrinsic implementation that lowers to an llvm call. bswap expands into a series of shifts and or's, for example.

> i had the same errors. adding "--disable-multilib" to configure solved > the problem. but i guess this is not a general solution. Thanks, that worked. Probably it would be good if this issue is included in the readme file for gcc-front end. Regards, Ferad -- Ferad Zyulkyarov Barcelona Supercomputing Center