similar to: [LLVMdev] EquivalenceClasses

On 5/9/07, David Greene <greened at obbligato.org> wrote: > > Can someone explain the terminology used in the Doxygen > comments for EquivalenceClasses? Specifically, what is > a "Leader" as opposed to other members of an equivalence > class? As far as I understand, leader is the first element of the class within the std::set container where all element of all

Given an object o of ElemType in an instance of EquivalenceClasses, I need to get a list of all members of the equivalence class that o is in. For various reasons, it is easiest if I could get an EquivalenceClasses::iterator that I can pass to member_begin and member_end. So naturally, I did something like this (pseudo-C++): EquivalenceClasses::iterator i = equiv.findValue(o);

getOrInsertLeaderValue cannot be const because it calls insert. Index: include/llvm/ADT/EquivalenceClasses.h =================================================================== --- include/llvm/ADT/EquivalenceClasses.h (revision 108148) +++ include/llvm/ADT/EquivalenceClasses.h (working copy) @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ /// getOrInsertLeaderValue - Return the leader for the specified value that is

HI guys. I'm trying to build the poolalloc on llvm-2.0 but there exist some errors. Can you tell me which version of llvm is known to make the poolalloc build and install successful? Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20070710/4ab5e155/attachment.html>

The current LLVM CVS HEAD does not build for me (RedHat 9). The issue is a one line fix. The file "include/llvm/ADT/EquivalenceClasses.h" needs to include <stdint.h> in order to get the typedef for "intptr_t." If anyone wants me to make a patch for this, let me know. The build error that this solves is: llvm[3]: Compiling DataStructure.cpp for Debug build In file

Hey, Downloaded the release, used CMake to create solution... building mostly seems to be OK, except for a couple of compiler errors. warning C4090: 'function' : different 'const' qualifiers d:\companyone\external\llvm\source\llvm-2.7\lib\support\regengine.inc 188 error C2248: 'llvm::EquivalenceClasses<ElemTy>::ECValue::ECValue' : cannot access private member

Hey, So I tried to fix these errors, and have everything compiling now... not too difficult, just annoying. error C2248: 'llvm::EquivalenceClasses< > > ElemTy>::ECValue::ECValue' : cannot access private member declared in class > 'llvm::EquivalenceClasses<ElemTy>::ECValue' C:\Program Files > (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0\VC\include\xmemory 208

Sorry, always end up not replying to the list: The main issue with dealing with next this way is that people adding new uses of next will probably not be using c++0x and therefore won't know it's ambiguous and that it needs to be qualified. There are also two issues with rvalue references and the STL: 1. EquivalenceClasses, in the insert and findLeader functions, it uses map functions

Hello, I Have a question related to the RT check on pointers during Loop Access Analysis pass. There is a testcase with loop code that consist of 4 different memory operations referring two global objects of different address spaces. One from global constant (address space 4, addr_size = 64) and the other from local, LDS (address space 3, addr_size= 32). (Details of various address spaces

On Dec 2, 2009, at 6:54 AM, Howard Hinnant wrote: > I've completed a survey of llvm for unnecessary dependencies on > libstdc++, and on conflicts with the upcoming C++0X standard, and am > recommending several changes in the enclosed patch (created with svn > diff). Thanks, applied here: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20091130/092102.html I

On Dec 3, 2009, at 5:24 AM, Ahmed Charles wrote: > Sorry, always end up not replying to the list: > > The main issue with dealing with next this way is that people adding new uses of next will probably not be using c++0x and therefore won't know it's ambiguous and that it needs to be qualified. True. But when this code is compiled under C++0X you get an easy to diagnose, easy

I've completed a survey of llvm for unnecessary dependencies on libstdc++, and on conflicts with the upcoming C++0X standard, and am recommending several changes in the enclosed patch (created with svn diff). Here is a summary of the patch: --- #include <cstdlib> added to LinkAllVMCore.h and LinkAllCodegenComponents.h to declare std::getenv. Changed next(...) to llvm::next(...) in

Hi Stefanos, Attached the testcase. I tried to reduce it further, but the problem goes away when I remove the instructions further. There is a nested loop and the fault occurs while processing the inner loop (for.body) To reproduce the crash: opt -O3 testcase.ll -o out.ll > `groupChecks()` will only try to group pointers that are on the same alias set. If that’s true, the RT check

from the SD / SelectionDAG form of a global-virt-reg, IE a CopyToReg or CopyFromReg where the Reg is a virtual-register (not a physical-register), I need to compute the set of all other global-virt-regs that this one is connected to through PHI nodes as the PHI nodes set up equivalence relations, I should be able to use ADT/EquivalenceClasses.h which seems to implement a generic Union-Find

Sorry for just talking to myself here, just trying to keep people in the loop on my findings. The problem seems to be a much larger issue with the Visual Studio 2010 C++ Compiler and not really related to clang/llvm. The following snippet of code does *NOT *compile in 2010.. #include <vector> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { std::pair<int, void*> mypair(0, NULL); return 0; }

We are getting some pushback from our SA group regarding root having ssh user equivalence on the cluster where we run OCFS2. Is it required to have the ssh user equivalence setup for the root user when running OCFS2 ? Thanks in advance, Reid Reid McKinley ******************************************************************************************** This message, including any

Hi! is there a way in R to check whether the outcome of two different experiments is statistically distinguishable or indistinguishable? More preciously, I used the wilcoxon test to determine the differences between controls and treated subjects for two different experiments. Now I would like to check whether the two lists of analytes obtained are statistically distinguishable or

Hello, helpeRs, I recently used a linear mixed effects model followed by ANOVA to assess the relationship between a categorical predictor variable with 2 levels (and random effects) and a numeric response variable. As I was concerned about the lack of a power analysis prior to data collection, it was suggested that I use an equivalence test to complement the conventional hypothesis test.

Interesting to see the Equivalence. As a first thing, I tried: semanage fcontext -a -e /var/lib/mysql.old /var/lib/mysql then restorecon -R /var/lib/mysql # semanage fcontext -lC SELinux fcontext type Context /home/users(/.*)? all files system_u:object_r:user_home_dir_t:s0 /var/lib/mysql all

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Daniel Berlin" <dberlin at dberlin.org> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "Andrey Bokhanko" <andreybokhanko at gmail.com>, "llvm-dev" > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 7:02:57 PM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC] Interprocedural