similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM-GCC Back

On May 5, 2007, at 6:44 AM, Jeff Cohen wrote: > Bill wrote: >> The LLVM-GCC anonymous mirror should be updated now. Let me know if >> this happens again. >> >> -bw > > It's still taking over an hour for rsync to occur. > I can try to see if they will move the rsync to a better time. Unfortunately, I don't have much control over that end of it. Would

On May 5, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Jeff Cohen wrote: > Bill Wendling wrote: >> On May 5, 2007, at 6:44 AM, Jeff Cohen wrote: >> >>> Bill wrote: >>>> The LLVM-GCC anonymous mirror should be updated now. Let me know if >>>> this happens again. >>>> >>>> -bw >>> >>> It's still taking over an hour for rsync to

Bill Wendling wrote: > On May 5, 2007, at 6:44 AM, Jeff Cohen wrote: > >> Bill wrote: >>> The LLVM-GCC anonymous mirror should be updated now. Let me know if >>> this happens again. >>> >>> -bw >> >> It's still taking over an hour for rsync to occur. >> > I can try to see if they will move the rsync to a better time. >

Bill wrote: > The LLVM-GCC anonymous mirror should be updated now. Let me know if > this happens again. > > -bw It's still taking over an hour for rsync to occur.

Bill Wendling wrote: > On May 5, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Jeff Cohen wrote: > >> Bill Wendling wrote: >>> On May 5, 2007, at 6:44 AM, Jeff Cohen wrote: >>> >>>> Bill wrote: >>>>> The LLVM-GCC anonymous mirror should be updated now. Let me know if >>>>> this happens again. >>>>> >>>>> -bw >>>>

Jeff Cohen wrote: > Bill Wendling wrote: > >>> I'll ping the guy who's in charge of the sync and ask him when it's >>> done. Right now, the copy to the Apple internal mirror is done at 2AM >>> PDT. From your email, I suspect that the sync is done around 3ish. >>> Though maybe it's somehow dependent upon when I update the mirror??

Jeff Cohen wrote: > Jeff Cohen wrote: > >> Bill Wendling wrote: >> >> >>>> I'll ping the guy who's in charge of the sync and ask him when it's >>>> done. Right now, the copy to the Apple internal mirror is done at 2AM >>>> PDT. From your email, I suspect that the sync is done around 3ish. >>>> Though

The llvm-gcc source can be download from: http://jolt-lang.org/llvm-gcc.tar.bz2 31mb ~7 minute download http://jolt-lang.org/llvm-gcc.tar.gz 40mb ~8.5 minute download Download times assume you are the only person downloading. Please download the bz2 version if possible. I currently have no unexpected failures. Bill wrote: > On 5/4/07, Anton Korobeynikov <asl at

Hi Bill, Thanks for the testing case. Most of the time is spent on debug info verifier. I fixed a bug in r194974, now it takes too long to run debug info verification. Debug info verifier is part of the verifier which is a Function Pass. Tot currently tries to pull all reachable debug info MDNodes in each function, which is too time-consuming. The correct fix seems to be separating debug info

Thanks :-) One last thing. It seems like the patch has a lot of whitespace changes. Could you create the diff with the -b option? -bw On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Rajika Kumarasiri <rajikacc at gmail.com> wrote: > hi Bill, > Thanks for the comments. I'll update the patch according to that. > > -Rajika > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:56 PM, Bill Wendling

I think it might be. I’m attaching a preprocessed file that can show the problem. Compile it with ToT. $ clang++ -g -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fno-common -Woverloaded-virtual -Wcast-qual -fno-strict-aliasing -m64 -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wall -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings -Wcovered-switch-default -Wno-uninitialized -Wno-missing-field-initializers -c

Jeff Cohen wrote: > And even if the mirror was promptly updated at 2am, it wouldn't have > mattered. The mirror got fatally out of sync with llvm less than an > hour later. There are still massive errors building llvm-gcc. > My nightly tester still can't build llvm-gcc. > And the Visual Studio build is massively broken too. I don't have time > to fix it

On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Bill, > > Thanks for the testing case. Most of the time is spent on debug info > verifier. > I fixed a bug in r194974, now it takes too long to run debug info > verification. > > Debug info verifier is part of the verifier which is a Function Pass. Tot > currently tries to pull all

My mistake. I needed to update llvm-gcc as well. Sorry for the noise. -bw On Dec 23, 2009, at 3:22 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > This is a new build failure as of today. Does this look familiar to anyone? > > -bw > > llvm[2]: Compiling CommonProfiling.ll to CommonProfiling.bc for Debug build (bytecode) > Intrinsic parameter #1 is wrong! > i64 (i8*, i32)* @llvm.objectsize.i64

This is a new build failure as of today. Does this look familiar to anyone? -bw llvm[2]: Compiling CommonProfiling.ll to CommonProfiling.bc for Debug build (bytecode) Intrinsic parameter #1 is wrong! i64 (i8*, i32)* @llvm.objectsize.i64 Intrinsic parameter #1 is wrong! i64 (i8*, i32)* @llvm.objectsize.i64 Intrinsic parameter #1 is wrong! i64 (i8*, i32)* @llvm.objectsize.i64 Intrinsic parameter

On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>wrote: > On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Bill, > > > > Thanks for the testing case. Most of the time is spent on debug info > > verifier. > > I fixed a bug in r194974, now it takes too long to run debug info > >

On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Rajika Kumarasiri <rajikacc at gmail.com> wrote: > hello everybody, > > I have added few improvements to my patch. Please review the new patch > directly. > Thanks! > Hi Rajika, A few stylistic comments. I'll let others comment on the algorithm for now: if ($VERBOSE) { print "( time -p $SVNCMD/llvm/trunk llvm; cd

There is a problem with Objective-C code where a null string is placed in the wrong section. If we have this code: #include <Foundation/Foundation.h> void foo() { NSLog(@""); } The null string is defined like this: .const .lcomm LC,1,0 ## LC Causing our linker to go nuts, because it expects anonymous strings to be in the __cstring section. I came up with the attached

hi Bill, Thanks for the comments. I'll update the patch according to that. -Rajika On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:56 PM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Rajika Kumarasiri <rajikacc at gmail.com> > wrote: > > hello everybody, > > > > I have added few improvements to my patch. Please review the new patch > >

Hi Bill Is this a recent regression? I recently changed the debug info verifier to fix a bug. Thanks, Manman > On Nov 17, 2013, at 5:52 PM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > > I think that debug info is slowing a self-hosting build down. This build has been going for ages now and shows no sign of quitting. To reproduce, build a Release+Asserts build of clang. Then