similar to: [LLVMdev] GMP

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > The current llvm/llvm-gcc4.2 svn is now fixed with > respect to the extra warnings that were being emitted > by the gfortran compiler. The gfortran testsuite results > under Intel Darwin9 are appended below. Yay! Thanks for testing this out. > Native configuration is i686-apple-darwin9 >

someguy wrote: > Oh. One more thing: > > Paulo, while your working out how to do what Chris said (making usage > of bigints into library calls), wouldn't it just warm your heart to > document the process on the wiki? > > </wiki pimping> > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:16 AM, someguy > <just.s0m3.guy+llvmdev at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Oh. I

Oh. I see. That way the bigints don't need a representation in llvm IR... neat. Sorry for the misdirecton! On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Mar 24, 2009, at 11:20 PM, someguy wrote: > >> I could be wrong, but I think that you may need to add a 'big-integer' >> intrinsic type to llvm. > > No, please

Hi all, We branched for the 3.1 release! (Yay!) If there are any fixes which you think should go into the release, please contact the code owners (http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#owners) so that they can approve the patches. No patches will be accepted into the 3.1 release without prior approval! This should be a great release! :-) -bw

On 9/25/07, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > On 9/24/07, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sep 24, 2007, at 3:15 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > > > > Weird. I see a potential problem, though. The code is like this: > > > > void dumpToDOUT(SparseBitVector<> *bitmap) { > > dump(*bitmap, DOUT); > > } >

On Mar 24, 2009, at 11:20 PM, someguy wrote: > I could be wrong, but I think that you may need to add a 'big-integer' > intrinsic type to llvm. No, please don't. GMP is just another library like libc, your front- end should just generate calls into it like any other library. This is similar to how we handle threading and many other "language features". -Chris

Hi Seung, It should be fairly straight-forward to do in LLVM. Once you identify the loops, then identify the PHI nodes that you need to convert, then apply the transformation below. The fine details on how to create an instruction and replace one instruction with another are documented in the docs section and in other code. :-) One thing to be careful of, if you convert a variable like

Bill, Depending on what Seung's problem is, converting *out* of SSA form may actually be the wrong thing to do. Seung needs to explain exactly problem he is unable solve using SSA form. --Vikram http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve http://llvm.org/ On Jan 28, 2008, at 1:10 AM, Bill Wendling wrote: > Hi Seung, > > It should be fairly straight-forward to do in LLVM. Once you

On Sep 24, 2007, at 3:15 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > > On Sep 24, 2007, at 3:07 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > >> A debug or release build? >> >> -bw > > Both, actually. Weird. I see a potential problem, though. The code is like this: void dumpToDOUT(SparseBitVector<> *bitmap) { dump(*bitmap, DOUT); } where dump expects an llvm::OStream& for the

On 8/24/07, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > so how about turning it on? > > It sounds good, but I'm concerned about darwin/x86. Bill, can you see how > well darwin/x86 is doing these days? If there are no regressions from > turning this on by default, we should do it. :) > I'm assuming that this is 4.2? :-) I'll give it a try. -bw

FYI: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-October/066389.html Please read and let me know you comments. -bw On Oct 11, 2013, at 2:47 PM, Dmitry Babokin <babokin at gmail.com> wrote: > Looking forward to these changes! Thanks for working on it. > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > I

Yes, this is me. I'll look at this tonight when I have access to a machine. Evan On Jan 27, 2008, at 1:01 AM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > In the last few days, some change introduced an internal compiler > error. On my G4 (PPC), I'm getting this: > > $ cat testcase.i > struct A {}; > struct B { > struct A c[0]; > };

Looking forward to these changes! Thanks for working on it. On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > I can try my best, but it would be a bit tricky to get it all finished by > then... > > -bw > > On Oct 11, 2013, at 4:10 AM, Dmitry Babokin <babokin at gmail.com> wrote: > > Bill, > > Are there

how to get this branch? still svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk llvm? Thank you. On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > We branched for the 3.1 release! (Yay!) > > If there are any fixes which you think should go into the release, please > contact the code owners

Hi all, In the last few days, some change introduced an internal compiler error. On my G4 (PPC), I'm getting this: $ cat testcase.i struct A {}; struct B { struct A c[0]; }; extern const struct B *pB; void bork(void) { const struct A *pA = pB->c; } $ /Users/wendling/llvm/llvm-gcc-4.2.obj/./gcc/xgcc -B/Users/wendling/ llvm/llvm-gcc-4.2.obj/./gcc/ -B/Users/wendling/llvm/llvm-

On 9/24/07, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sep 24, 2007, at 3:15 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > > > > > On Sep 24, 2007, at 3:07 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > > > >> A debug or release build? > >> > >> -bw > > > > Both, actually. > > Weird. I see a potential problem, though. The code is like this: > >

Hello everybody, Trying to install the package gmp I get the following errors and fail to install: Error in dyn.load(file, DLLpath = DLLpath, ...) : unable to load shared object '/usr/local/lib/R/site-library/gmp/libs/gmp.so': libgmp.so.10: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Warning in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : Data for RFC 2409 Oakley groups requires

Hello, Last year, I installed CentOS 5.2 on an HP Proliant Server. Along with other packages, the gmp and gmp-devel version 4.1.4 packages were installed. To the best of my knowledge these packages do not come from the gmp team. Recently, I built an rpm package for gmp 5.0.1 for CentOS 5.2. I tried to update the gmp package by command rpm -Uvh gmp-5.0.1-1.x86_64.rpm but the update failed

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0365 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0365.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: f1855126a943ed4aac412006af98490248b739b4f9f78487f17c3275557948e2 gmp-4.3.1-7.el6_2.2.i686.rpm 79970b1d4219889536ba4cf865ddf9defa9b0c9a057e94c11d6a95e46abad2fa

On Jun 16, 2009, at 1:05 PM, Granville Barnett wrote: > I'm more interested in whether or not there are any projects in the > works that fuse the tools together to build a better IDE experience. > I forget which presentation it was, but one of the developers (I > *think* it was the gentleman that presented something on CLANG at > the dev's conference 2008) made a bit