similar to: [LLVMdev] CREDITS.TXT

Hi all, The llvm 1.8 release is getting closer. Please update your contributions in the CREDITS.TXT file as appropriate. Thanks, -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/

Hi LLVMers, We're actively working on finishing up the release, which has been delayed. Last week was dominated by several paper submissions which were all due at about the same time, so the release fell behind (if you're interested, the papers are available on the main page). We are currently shooting for getting the release out the door early next week. That said, we have made a lot

On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Reid Spencer wrote: > This is a reminder that the script will change so that tonight's nightly > test will use the hybrid svn/cvs version. This requires the Date::Parse > perl module. If you haven't installed it yet, please do so before the > next run of your nightly test. Hi Reid, We didn't have a chance to talk about this much when this came up, but

On Mon, 14 May 2007, Jeff Cohen wrote: > Chris Lattner wrote: >> x. Roman Samoilov contributed a new MSIL backend to LLVM. llc - >> march=msil will now turn LLVM into MSIL (".net") bytecode. This is still >> fairly early development with a number of limitations. > This ought not be advertised to the world. It is not useful for any purpose. Jeff,

The vector LLVA extension will not be merged into the 1.6 release branch? It will make me have to merge twice: one for 1.6 and one for vector LLVA. When do you plan to merge the vector LLVA to the main trunk, please? On 26/10/05, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > Hi All, > > I'm putting together the announcement for the LLVM 1.6 release. Here is > what I

LLVM 1.9 is available now! Download it here: http://llvm.org/ releases/ or view the release here: http://llvm.org/releases/1.9/docs/ ReleaseNotes.html This is a huge new release with many improvements, new features, better codegen, faster compiles, and many bugs fixed. One telling feature is that LLVM now correctly builds itself and passes all its regression tests when self-hosted: an

LLVM 2.0 is done! Download it here: http://llvm.org/releases/ or view the release notes: http://llvm.org/releases/2.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html LLVM 2.0 is a great release in many ways. It includes a wide range of new features, new optimizations, better codegen, and new targets. We were also able to signficantly revise several core aspects of the LLVM IR and design (such as the type system

Hi All, There's a new snapshot of llvmgcc4 available here: http://nondot.org/sabre/2006-05-08-llvm-gcc-4.tar.gz This release includes the various portability fixes contributed on llvmdev, includes fixes to build with mainline CVS (and, thus, *requires* mainline CVS), and includes various other bug fixes. If you're interested, please try it out. Thanks, -Chris --

On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Daniel Berlin wrote: > This certainly doesn't occur in gcc mainline. > In fact, I improved the error message, and added a error test to gcc > just yesterday. Yep, clang reports: t.c:4:12: error: read-only variable is not assignable arr[0] = 1; ~~~~~~ ^ 1 diagnostic generated. so this is specific to llvm-gcc somehow. -Chris > On 8/9/07, Chris

Chris Lattner wrote: > > Hi All, > > There's a new snapshot of llvmgcc4 available here: > > http://nondot.org/sabre/2006-05-08-llvm-gcc-4.tar.gz > > This release includes the various portability fixes contributed on > llvmdev, includes fixes to build with mainline CVS (and, thus, *requires* > mainline CVS), and includes various other bug fixes. > > If

I'd definitely be interested in seeing this happen. If you get it working, I might be able to contribute a build slave as well. --Owen On May 6, 2007, at 10:35 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > I don't know if others would be interested as well, but I should be > able to set it up at least on one of my machines over the summer, > and on a continuing basis if its found

I commented this line and it is compiling now: extern void *malloc ARGS((unsigned)); I hope that will not cause a different kind of problem. What it is zalloc used for? Thanks --- Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, xavier wrote: > > > It seems that this happened before but I do not know the details: > >

Chris, I am doing Cygwin builds at the moment so it will not be immediately attended to. Do you want it done for 2.0 ? Or could it be a post 2.0 patch which I suggest as 4.3 branch is not up for a release too soon ? Aaron ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Lattner" <sabre at nondot.org> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent:

Yes, sorry for not mentioning it. I added that header also Although I suppose that if I am not using Sparc there will be no problem (it's an Itanium 2 machine) Thanks --- Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, xavier wrote: > > > I commented this line and it is compiling now: > > > > extern void *malloc ARGS((unsigned)); > >

This certainly doesn't occur in gcc mainline. In fact, I improved the error message, and added a error test to gcc just yesterday. On 8/9/07, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, Nikhil A. Patil wrote: > > I think I found a bug. I don't know if it's in upstream gcc or llvm-gcc4. > > Looks like a bug, please file a bugzilla entry. >

On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, Ben Chambers wrote: > Ah, I was missing that include/llvm/LinkAllPasses.h change. Thanks! > Now I have it working, except for the fact that it doesn't seem to > generate fresh names for things. Or if it does, they're the empty > string (I suspect it is the latter, since when I create the new > instruction the empty string is passed in for the name of

On Wed, 5 May 2004, Vikram S. Adve wrote: > Do you have the DS graph dot file for Olden-power? Here you go: /home/vadve/lattner/Writings/006-Masters-Thesis/figs/power.dot -Chris > --Vikram > http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ > > On May 5, 2004, at 11:11 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > > On Wed, 5 May 2004, Oscar Fuentes wrote: > > >

the proposed architecture (chris) doesn't seem to attack the phase ordering problem. through having independent instruction selection, instruction scheduling, and register allocation phases faciliate a modular design, but i believe the phase-coupled code generator generator high quality code on many architectures. espeically in the embedded system like a media/dsp processors with very limited

On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Jingling Xue wrote: > I understand that LLVM is now available in the public domain. Yes it is. It can be downloaded from the LLVM releases page here: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/releases/ > I need to decide which compiler system I will use for my advanced > compiler course this year. The current release is 1.1. We are tentatively planning to release 1.2 sometime in

On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Ben Chambers wrote: > How hard would it be to compile this pass and add it to the passes > that opt can run? Is this something I should be able to do relatively > quickly? What was the name of the file(s) that implemented the pass? It should be easy, modulo it bitrotting. It is already built as an opt pass. The filename was LowerConstantExpr.cpp IIRC. -Chris