Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] About an incident with my e-mail account"
2007 Apr 12
0
[LLVMdev] What a hot clip people :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWu-e6B2AJs
--
Ferad Zyulkyarov
Barcelona Supercomputing Center
c/ Gran Capita 2-4, Nexus I, 204
08034 Barcelona - SPAIN
e-mail: ferad.zyulkyarov at bsc.es
tel: +34 934054294
fax: +34 934137721
2007 Mar 29
0
[LLVMdev] gcc 4.1* carashes compiling llvm-gcc
GCC 4.1.x series is known not to compile LLVM. Its is well documented, avoid
GCC 4.1.
Aaron
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ferad Zyulkyarov" <feradz at gmail.com>
To: <LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 10:38 PM
Subject: [LLVMdev] gcc 4.1* carashes compiling llvm-gcc
> Hi,
>
> I tried to compile the GCC front end of LLVM in a 16 CPU
2007 Mar 28
5
[LLVMdev] gcc 4.1* carashes compiling llvm-gcc
Hi,
I tried to compile the GCC front end of LLVM in a 16 CPU SMP machine
with 64bit intel xeon CPUs. I tried with (GCC 4.1.0, 4.1.1, 4.1.2
versions). The LLVM compiles perfectly but when compiling the gcc
front end the compiler crashes with a segmentation fault by reporting
for memory leakages. Probably this is for the GCC's mailing list, but
decided to ask if you know anything more about
2007 Mar 29
0
[LLVMdev] gcc 4.1* carashes compiling llvm-gcc
Hi Anton,
> What's the version of binutils you're using? I've seen such messages
> with 2.16 series, but they were only warnings...
The version of binutils is 2.17
By the way. I will use the opportunity to ask you again :) I tried to
compile with gcc 4.0.4. It successfully compile LLVM but fails
compiling LLVM's gcc front end. The problem is architectural 32 and 64
bit.
2007 Mar 31
2
[LLVMdev] About implementing new intrinsic
Hi,
I will try to explain by giving an example.
Let's say that I have an intrinsic: int llvm.myintrinsic(int)
I have a function: int myintrinsic_handler(int)
When
%var = call int %llvm.myintrinsic( int %arg )
is met in the code, I want the code generator put in its place: a call
to function
"myintrinsic_handler" (i.e. %var = call int %myintrinsic_handler( int %arg ) )
or
2007 Apr 02
2
[LLVMdev] About implementing new intrinsic
Hi,
> > I want to implement a new intrinsic in llvm that will denote a
> > parallel section within a function.
>
> Can you explain what you mean by a parallel section within a function?
I want to see how OpenMP's parallel fit in the LLVM architecture, is
it easy to implement or not. GCC is too heavy platform to work on..
Ferad
--
Ferad Zyulkyarov
Barcelona Supercomputing
2007 Mar 24
3
[LLVMdev] Compilation problems
Hi,
I try to compile LLVM and the GCC frontend for LLVM.
The steps that I follow are first to compile LLVM and later to compile
GCC front end.
I tried to compile LLVM 1.8, 1.9 releases and the CVS versions.
I tried to compile with different GCC compilers 3.4.0, 4.1.2 and 4.2.0
GCC compilers 3.4.0 and 4.2.0 fail compiling LLVM sources. GCC 4.1.2 works.
I cannot compile GCC front end. When I
2007 Mar 29
1
[LLVMdev] gcc 4.1* carashes compiling llvm-gcc
Yes, you I read that in the docs. Do you have a preferred gcc version
that you would suggest me to work best. Unfortunately, version 3.4.2
that you suggest in your docs fails in compilation too.
Thanks,
Ferad
--
Ferad Zyulkyarov
Barcelona Supercomputing Center
2007 Mar 29
0
[LLVMdev] gcc 4.1* carashes compiling llvm-gcc
> i had the same errors. adding "--disable-multilib" to configure solved
> the problem. but i guess this is not a general solution.
Thanks, that worked. Probably it would be good if this issue is
included in the readme file for gcc-front end.
Regards,
Ferad
--
Ferad Zyulkyarov
Barcelona Supercomputing Center
2007 Mar 31
0
[LLVMdev] About implementing new intrinsic
Hi,
> IntrinsicLowering already does this. It lets you lower intrinsics to
> arbitrary LLVM calls, including calls to external functions.
I will try to do that in IntrinscLowering class. May you point me an
intrinsic implementation that lowers to an llvm call.
Thanks for advices ans hints,
Ferad
--
Ferad Zyulkyarov
Barcelona Supercomputing Center
2007 Mar 31
6
[LLVMdev] About implementing new intrinsic
Hi,
I want to implement a new intrinsic in llvm that will denote a
parallel section within a function. I followed the documentation for
extending llvm (http://llvm.org/docs/ExtendingLLVM.html) but there is
something about the working mechanism that is not clear for me.
1. Why do we have to add support for the C backend? Is this only
necessary to transform the llvm assembly (bytecode) into C code
2007 Apr 04
4
[LLVMdev] For a small help
Hi,
I want to ask for a small help for creating an instruction that calls
e member method of an object. I suppose that this is not a headache
but I am impatient in learning :) I would be very thankful if you can
show me an example snippet code that does this in LLVM. Below is
described my case.
Let's say I have a class TestClass
class TestClass
{
int testMethod(int a);
}
and I want to
2007 Apr 04
0
[LLVMdev] For a small help
Hi Ferad,
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 19:48 +0200, Ferad Zyulkyarov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to ask for a small help for creating an instruction that calls
> e member method of an object. I suppose that this is not a headache
> but I am impatient in learning :) I would be very thankful if you can
> show me an example snippet code that does this in LLVM. Below is
> described my
2007 May 11
0
[LLVMdev] Instruction::getNext and Instruction::getPrev are private
Thanks Antont and Gabor.. I will use the iterator instead..
On 5/11/07, Anton Korobeynikov <asl at math.spbu.ru> wrote:
> Hello, Ferad.
>
> > I switched to the upcoming version 2.0 branch and porting my code from
> > 1.9. Thanks there is not a lot to do. I found that
> > Instruction::getNext and Instruction::getPrev are private. Is this
> > intentional?
>
2007 Mar 29
2
[LLVMdev] gcc 4.1* carashes compiling llvm-gcc
Ferad Zyulkyarov wrote:
> By the way. I will use the opportunity to ask you again :) I tried to
> compile with gcc 4.0.4. It successfully compile LLVM but fails
> compiling LLVM's gcc front end. The problem is architectural 32 and 64
> bit. The machine has intel xeon CPU that is physically 32 bit but has
> 64 extension x86_64 (or something like that, I am not exactly sure).
>
2007 Mar 31
1
[LLVMdev] About implementing new intrinsic
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Ferad Zyulkyarov wrote:
>> IntrinsicLowering already does this. It lets you lower intrinsics to
>> arbitrary LLVM calls, including calls to external functions.
>
> I will try to do that in IntrinscLowering class. May you point me an
> intrinsic implementation that lowers to an llvm call.
bswap expands into a series of shifts and or's, for example.
2007 Apr 02
0
[LLVMdev] About implementing new intrinsic
On Mar 31, 2007, at 8:34 AM, Ferad Zyulkyarov wrote:
> I want to implement a new intrinsic in llvm that will denote a
> parallel section within a function.
Can you explain what you mean by a parallel section within a function?
--Vikram
2007 Apr 02
0
[LLVMdev] About implementing new intrinsic
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Ferad Zyulkyarov wrote:
>>> I want to implement a new intrinsic in llvm that will denote a
>>> parallel section within a function.
>> Can you explain what you mean by a parallel section within a function?
> I want to see how OpenMP's parallel fit in the LLVM architecture, is
> it easy to implement or not. GCC is too heavy platform to work on..
2007 Apr 04
0
[LLVMdev] For a small help
Ferad Zyulkyarov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to ask for a small help for creating an instruction that calls
> e member method of an object. I suppose that this is not a headache
> but I am impatient in learning :) I would be very thankful if you can
> show me an example snippet code that does this in LLVM. Below is
> described my case.
>
> Let's say I have a class
2007 Apr 01
0
[LLVMdev] About implementing new intrinsic
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Ferad Zyulkyarov wrote:
> I will try to explain by giving an example.
> Let's say that I have an intrinsic: int llvm.myintrinsic(int)
> I have a function: int myintrinsic_handler(int)
> When
> %var = call int %llvm.myintrinsic( int %arg )
> is met in the code, I want the code generator put in its place: a call
> to function
>