similar to: [LLVMdev] New Web Pages

Hi Reid, On 06 Apr 2007, at 04:51, Reid Spencer wrote: > All, > > Just in case you missed the construction of these pages, I thought > you'd > like to know about these new ones: > > http://llvm.org/DevMtgMay2007.html > All the latest details on the 25th May Developer's meeting. Page > modified daily! Do you know if there are plans for any form of live

Hi Kenneth, On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 08:55 +0200, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > Hi Reid, > > On 06 Apr 2007, at 04:51, Reid Spencer wrote: > > > All, > > > > Just in case you missed the construction of these pages, I thought > > you'd > > like to know about these new ones: > > > > http://llvm.org/DevMtgMay2007.html > > All the latest

Hi Lauro, On 14 Aug 2007, at 01:10, Lauro Ramos Venancio wrote: > Hi all, > > I did a performance test of two real applications (FFMPEG and GTK) on > ARM. For more details see: > http://laurovenancio.wordpress.com/2007/08/07/llvm-perf-tests/ Could you give me some more information about the applications you compiled and ran? Where can I obtain source codes, which input did

Hi all, I did a performance test of two real applications (FFMPEG and GTK) on ARM. For more details see: http://laurovenancio.wordpress.com/2007/08/07/llvm-perf-tests/ Lauro

On 31 Aug 2006, at 19:13, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > >> When I adjust the settings in Makefile.nagfortran as follows, I'm >> able to get bytecode file for lucas, galgel and facerec, but make >> still quits with an error (after generating >> bytecode files for 7 (out of 26) benchmarks. >> >> Also, the file

On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > Bummer. I think I'll contact the NAG support for more info on this. Can you > show me the content of your Makefile.nagfortran? It is identical to yours. > Also, it is possible to tell make only to compile benchmark X? How can I > enforce this? Go into the directory for that benchmark, then run 'make' or whatever. -Chris --

I have been wondering why llvm-ld generates the same code with or without the option "-O5" so I looked at its source (llvm 2.2). And apparently, the options "-On" are accepted but never used! The program runs a fixed set of optimization passes, unless "-disable-opt" is specified. What is the reason for this? If this is intended, then the documentation should say

On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, HyperQuantum wrote: > I have been wondering why llvm-ld generates the same code with or without the option "-O5" so I looked at its source (llvm 2.2). And apparently, the options "-On" are accepted but never used! The program runs a fixed set of optimization passes, unless "-disable-opt" is specified. What is the reason for this? If this is

On 31 Aug 2006, at 23:46, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: >> Bummer. I think I'll contact the NAG support for more info on >> this. Can you >> show me the content of your Makefile.nagfortran? > > It is identical to yours. > >> Also, it is possible to tell make only to compile benchmark X? How >> can I >>

Hi Scott, On 18 Mar 2007, at 04:22, Scott Fortmann-Roe wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that LLVM had signed up as a mentoring organization for > Google's summer of code. LLVM looks like an exciting project that > overlaps some of my interests. > > I would be interested in developing an additional front end for a > language it does not currently support (I'm open to

Hi, I noticed that LLVM had signed up as a mentoring organization for Google's summer of code. LLVM looks like an exciting project that overlaps some of my interests. I would be interested in developing an additional front end for a language it does not currently support (I'm open to what language). I do not know much about what this entails in regards to what LLVM requires from its

Hello, On Jun 3, 2008, at 08:52 , Tanya Lattner wrote: > All, > > We are in desperate need of linux x86 testers (32 or 64 bit). If you > could set one up, the LLVM project would be very grateful. Right now > we have virtually no testers covering this platform. I think I might be able to set up a nightly tester for Linux x86 (32- bit). Although I've been following LLVM for

All, We are in desperate need of linux x86 testers (32 or 64 bit). If you could set one up, the LLVM project would be very grateful. Right now we have virtually no testers covering this platform. Directions to set up a tester are here: http://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html#nightly These directions could be improved of course. If you have any questions, I will be happy to assist you in

Hi Everyone, I set up a page to host the videos and slides from the meeting, and uploaded all the videos: http://llvm.org/devmtg/2007-05/index.html So far, I only have one set of slides on the page - please send me your slides! :) Also, I'd appreciate it if someone would write a blurb describing an overview of the meeting, etc at the top. Also, Scott, please let me know when it's ok

Hello, I'm trying to compile to SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode, using the llvm-test harness. I have tried this using: - both the 1.7 and 1.8 releases, without succes (and running into the same problems in both releases) - both the gcc3 and gcc4 frontends I'm working on Linux/x86. LLVM is configured using: ./configure --prefix=/path/to/bin/dir and compiled using gmake; gmake

I just noticed this - I can't promise any particular amount of TLC, but I'll certainly be giving the Fortran front-end some attention as soon as LLVM moves to gcc 4.2. For future reference, does anyone know of a good free Fortran compiler test suite? Cheers, -mike On 5/14/07, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Duraid, > > > Does anyone know what the

On 01 Sep 2006, at 10:05, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > >> >>> Also, it is possible to tell make only to compile benchmark X? How >>> can I >>> enforce this? >> >> Go into the directory for that benchmark, then run 'make' or >> whatever. > I tried tom compile each of the SPEC CPU2000 benchmarks using the make command is each respective

Chris Lattner wrote: > Hacking on the interpreter is easy, but has several drawbacks. In > particular, the interpreter is very slow (even compared to other > interpreters) and it is missing functionality: you cannot call arbitrary > external functions, which causes many programs to fail in it. What do you mean by external functions? I only need to print stuff to file, the

John Criswell wrote: > You can compile library code into LLVM bytecode libraries and link them > with gccld. In general, LLVM provides tools equivalent to most of your > compiler tool chain (gccas, gccld, llvm-ar, llvm-nm, etc). You can, for > example, make an archive of LLVM bytecode files. > > The problem, in your case, is that no one has successfully compiled all >

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: >> After browsing through the docs, at a first glance I think I should >> write a plugin for the 'analyze' tool. I think >> http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html is where I should start from. >> The only problem I see now is that there doesn't seem to be a way to >> get