similar to: [LLVMdev] Integrating LLVM in an existing project

Hi Nicolas, On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 14:10 +0200, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > Hi everyone, > > After some time hacking on llvm, let me introduce myself :) > I'm a PhD student at the French university Pierre et Marie Curie in > Paris. I work on a project > called the "Virtual Virtual Machine" project. You can find some (dated) > information on the > website

Hi Reid Reid Spencer wrote: > > Interesting project. I wish you could talk about it at the Developer's > Meeting (http://llvm.org/DevMtgMay2007.html :) > > I wish I could! Unfortunately there is very little chance I get the fundings to go to the US in May. > > I have signed up to implemented this (PR1269) just as Chris' note > states. HLVM needs it for much

On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > On top of this execution environment we have implemented a java virtual > machine and a .net virtual machine. They > are both functional and we achieve reasonable performance (1/3 of IBM's > JVM or Mono). Cool. > This algorithm does not work with llvm because creating labels (which > correspond to creating basic blocks) does not

Hi Devang, >> I use llvm and llvm-gcc as a C-to-C transformation tool using a >> modified version of the c backend, and rely on llvm debug instructions >> to link back to the original source code. >> >> Does anyone know how to get detailed line number and variable debug >> information at optimization levels beyond O0? >> >> Currently, I extract this

Hello, I use llvm and llvm-gcc as a C-to-C transformation tool using a modified version of the c backend, and rely on llvm debug instructions to link back to the original source code. Does anyone know how to get detailed line number and variable debug information at optimization levels beyond O0? Currently, I extract this debug information by compiling with -g. This works fine with

Hi Martijn On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 4:52 AM, Martijn <martijn at martijnrutten.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I use llvm and llvm-gcc as a C-to-C transformation tool using a > modified version of the c backend, and rely on llvm debug instructions > to link back to the original source code. > > Does anyone know how to get detailed line number and variable debug > information

Hello, Nicolas. > Is there a way in llvm to get the address of a generated instruction? Or > somehow to fix the location of a label in the llvm code (something that > may look like a basic block perhaps) and get after the compilation the > address of this label? Maybe it's worth to use llvm.dbg.stoppoint? -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty of Mathematics &

Hi Martijn, On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:25 AM, Martijn <martijn at martijnrutten.com> wrote: >> >> Without mem2reg pass, you're unlikely to get much optimization done on your IR. > > Clear, thanks! I presume the mem2reg pass is also essential in the > CLang frontend, so CLang is not an alternative to llvm-gcc to keep > more debug information? Yes. > For the

[Moving discussion to LLVMdev] On 2008-10-31 21:55, Dan Gohman wrote: > Hi Török, > > @llvm.dbg.stoppoint actually does read and write memory, in a > sense. It's a point where a user could stop in a debugger, and > use the debugger to both read and write memory. If the optimizers > are allowed to reorder or delete memory operations, these > intrinsics will become

On Oct 31, 2008, at 1:29 PM, Török Edwin wrote: > Hi Dan, > I am actually more interested in Analysis working in presence of debug > info, but in order to get any meaningful results, you need to run some > transformations, at least GVN, otherwise loops aren't transformed to > canonical form either. Right. > So we could: > - teach GVN that a dependency on a debug

Hi Anton, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Maybe it's worth to use llvm.dbg.stoppoint? > > Do you have an example on how to use this intrinsic with the JIT? How can I get at compile time the address of the stoppoint? Thx, Nicolas

Well, I am much happier now that I understand about dsymutil, and can actually step through my program in gdb. However, there are still some issues that are puzzling me. 1) First off, the debugger appears to stop at odd points. The IR for my main function looks correct to me: define i32 @"main(tart.core.Array[tart.core.String])->int"(%"tart.core.Array[tart.core.String]"*

On 2008-11-03 12:33, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Oct 31, 2008, at 1:29 PM, Török Edwin wrote: > >> Hi Dan, >> I am actually more interested in Analysis working in presence of debug >> info, but in order to get any meaningful results, you need to run some >> transformations, at least GVN, otherwise loops aren't transformed to >> canonical form either.

On Jun 12, 2011, at 1:25 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Sohail, > >> Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? > > not currently. The first step in this direction is to get rid of the invoke > instruction and attach exception handling information to basic blocks. See > http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/ExceptionHandlingChanges.txt > for a

Dear Staff, Here are some questions on the output formats of AliasSetTracker. The code is as below: int G1 = 9; int G2 = 5; int main() { int * XX; int * YY; XX = &G1; YY = XX; YY = &G2; XX = &G2; } The output for -anders-aa is: Alias Set Tracker: 5 alias sets for 4 pointer values. AliasSet[0xea6fb0,0] may alias, Mod/Ref 10 Call Sites: void ({ }*)*

I'm playing around with different combinations of LTO passes, and I've run into a strange problem: I have a 'main' function that looks like this: define i32 @"main(tart.core.Array[tart.core.String])->int"(%"tart.core.Array[tart.core.String]"* %args) { entry: call void @llvm.dbg.func.start(metadata !0) call void @llvm.dbg.stoppoint(i32 2, i32 19, metadata

Quoting Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com>: Dear Eli, Thanks very much for your reply. I have modified the XX and YY to be global variables, but the output of AliasSetTracker are still MUST alias: Alias Set Tracker: 5 alias sets for 4 pointer values. AliasSet[0xea55d0,0] may alias, Mod/Ref 8 Call Sites: void ({ }*)* @llvm.dbg.func.start, void (i32, i32, { }*)*

Well, after some investigation I have a few more clues as to what is going on. I have a module which contains a call to an external native function. This native function lives in a static library, and there is an external declaration for it in the module. I find that I can run "llvm-ld -disable-opts -native -l mylibrary test.bc" and it works fine. That is, llvm-ld is able to

On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 5:07 PM, <hc2428 at columbia.edu> wrote: > However, I am a little confused with these output. In Both anders-aa > and steens-aa, XX and YY should stay in the same AliasSet, and their > alias relationship should be May Alias, right? %XX and %YY are the results of alloca instructions (i.e. equivalent to the C expressions "&XX" and

On Sep 30, 2009, at 12:06 AM, Talin wrote: > I'm playing around with different combinations of LTO passes, and > I've run into a strange problem: > > I have a 'main' function that looks like this: > > define i32 @"main(tart.core.Array[tart.core.String])- > >int"(%"tart.core.Array[tart.core.String]"* %args) { > entry: > call