similar to: [LLVMdev] Reminder: NewNIghtlyTest.pl

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Reminder: NewNIghtlyTest.pl"

2007 Apr 05
0
[LLVMdev] Reminder: NewNIghtlyTest.pl
Adam, > Do you have some examples of the string to parse? Surely (I don't know, what's the output with different locales): Moved for versioning. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r33 | jlaskey | 2006-08-01 00:59:18 +0400 (Втр, 01 Авг 2006) | 1 line Moved for versioning. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r32
2007 Apr 05
0
[LLVMdev] Reminder: NewNIghtlyTest.pl
Hello, Chris. > I agree. Is the date in a fixed format? wouldn't a simple regex do the > trick? It seems it doesn't have fixed format. At least it: 1. Outputs local time. 2. Date string contains national symbols We should parse date by hands and filter revisions, which took place during prev. day. So, in general we need 2 routines: 1. Parse date into some internal format. 2.
2007 Apr 05
0
[LLVMdev] Reminder: NewNIghtlyTest.pl
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Reid Spencer wrote: > This is a reminder that the script will change so that tonight's nightly > test will use the hybrid svn/cvs version. This requires the Date::Parse > perl module. If you haven't installed it yet, please do so before the > next run of your nightly test. Hi Reid, We didn't have a chance to talk about this much when this came up, but
2007 Apr 05
2
[LLVMdev] Reminder: NewNIghtlyTest.pl
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 14:07 -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Reid Spencer wrote: > > This is a reminder that the script will change so that tonight's nightly > > test will use the hybrid svn/cvs version. This requires the Date::Parse > > perl module. If you haven't installed it yet, please do so before the > > next run of your nightly test. >
2007 Apr 05
0
[LLVMdev] Reminder: NewNIghtlyTest.pl
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Reid Spencer wrote: >> this is another dependency people have to satisfy to be able to run the >> nightly tester. Is there any way to avoid this? > > Only two things I can think of: > > 1. Forgo having "what changed" information in the nightly test > 2. Ask Anton to write the date parsing without using Date::Parse and do > the parsing
2007 May 01
0
[LLVMdev] NewNightlyTest.pl - Please update
I've made some modifications to the NewNightlyTest.pl script and I'm noticing many testers do not seem to update this script (judging from the data being submitted to our database). Please update the script manually, or modify you cron (or whatever you have controlling your tester) to automatically update the testing script before running the tests. Thanks, Tanya
2007 Jul 02
0
[LLVMdev] NewNightlyTest.pl
All, I've updated the NewNightlyTest.pl script again to fix a bug. If you're running this script, please make a note of the following: * There was a bug that only allowed the script to work with SVN if the -verbose option was also given (yeah, go figure). That's been fixed now. * The script now defaults to checkout from subversion so there is no
2008 Mar 09
1
[LLVMdev] NewNightlyTester.pl: split into phases?
Am Samstag, den 08.03.2008, 15:11 -0800 schrieb Tanya Lattner: > >> A -noreport option is probably a good idea too. > > > > OK, that should be easy to add. > > > >> Just be sure not to change what it sends to the website. That needs > >> to > >> stay the same. > > > > Sure. I think wrapping an if statement around the HTTP send
2010 Jun 15
2
[LLVMdev] Question on X86 backend
Hi Micah, > In X86InstrInfo.td for Call Instructions, it mentions that Uses for > argument registers are added manually. Can someone point me to the > location where they are added as the comment doesn't reference a > where or how? the register uses are added by the function X86TargetLowering::LowerCall() during the DAG Lowering phase. This is the relevant code segment: // Add
2020 Aug 08
2
Switching to Ninja
> On Aug 8, 2020, at 3:32 PM, Dmitry Mikushin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Cool, thanks! > > вс, 9 авг. 2020 г. в 00:27, Petr Hosek <phosek at chromium.org <mailto:phosek at chromium.org>>: > You can set the LLVM_PARALLEL_LINK_JOBS CMake variable to restrict the number of link jobs. IMO, a more thorough solution would be switching to
2008 Mar 08
0
[LLVMdev] NewNightlyTester.pl: split into phases?
On Mar 8, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > > Am Samstag, den 08.03.2008, 14:02 -0800 schrieb Tanya Lattner: >> - ability to check out llvm-gcc or update llvm-gcc and build it >> before >> running tests. In addition to using a prebuilt binary. > > Does it need a prebuilt binary? > I have been suspecting so since it has been failing with BUILD ERROR
2008 Jul 06
3
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] patch to compile llvm-gcc using nightly tester script(NewNightlyTester.pl)
hello every body. Here with I have attached the patch which compile the llvm-gcc using nightly tester script. This patch add the following capabilities to the NewNightlyTester.pl script. 1. Checkout the llvm-gcc4.2 source from the SVN. 2. Compile the checkout llvm-gcc4.2 source tree. 3. Gather the configure/make out put informations. 4. Add the (3) informations to the %hash_of_data hash to be
2020 Aug 08
2
Switching to Ninja
You can set the LLVM_PARALLEL_LINK_JOBS CMake variable to restrict the number of link jobs. On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 3:00 PM Neil Nelson via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > https://ninja-build.org/manual.html > > ninja -h prints help output. Many of Ninja’s flags intentionally match > those of Make; e.g ninja -C build -j 20 changes into the build directory >
2006 Dec 05
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] combined arm patch
I had to revert these changes. When I did a clean build I was inundated with errors. I'm not sure if I made the cut off time for the mirror. -- Jim On Dec 5, 2006, at 8:35 AM, Jim Laskey wrote: > This patch should be in today's mirror ~6am PST. > > Cheers, > > -- Jim > > On Dec 4, 2006, at 4:32 PM, Rafael Espíndola wrote: > >> On 12/2/06, Jim Laskey
2008 Mar 08
3
[LLVMdev] NewNightlyTester.pl: split into phases?
Am Samstag, den 08.03.2008, 14:02 -0800 schrieb Tanya Lattner: > - ability to check out llvm-gcc or update llvm-gcc and build it before > running tests. In addition to using a prebuilt binary. Does it need a prebuilt binary? I have been suspecting so since it has been failing with BUILD ERROR for me. I just haven't found the time to verify that yet. I have yet to try building
2010 Nov 16
4
problem after migration
Hi, I believe I can post this here. I have a domU ( Redhat 6) running in Paravirt mode. When I migrate this domU to another host, looks like the domU is freezing in the other host. When I take it back to original host ,it starts to run normally and this is what can see in dmesg of domU : suspending xenstore... trying to map vcpu_info 0 at ffff88000434b020, mfn b67660, offset 32 cpu 0 using
2009 Dec 28
2
Modified R Code
Dear R helpers,   I have following input files. (Actually they are more than 10 rates but here i am considering only 2 rates to write my problem)   rate1.csv min1        max1            min2          max2          min3           max3 1.05        1.30               1.30          1.65             1.65          1.99   rate2.csv min1        max1            min2          max2          min3          
2006 Dec 04
4
[LLVMdev] combined arm patch
On 12/2/06, Jim Laskey <jlaskey at apple.com> wrote: > Rafael, > > Please bracket portions of your changes that involve modification of > C/C++ source code. For cases of modifying configuration scripts and > make files, use your best judgement. Obviously having the brackets > emitted in generated code is problematic (line numbers et cetera), so > don't bother in
2006 Dec 05
2
[LLVMdev] combined arm patch
This patch should be in today's mirror ~6am PST. Cheers, -- Jim On Dec 4, 2006, at 4:32 PM, Rafael Espíndola wrote: > On 12/2/06, Jim Laskey <jlaskey at apple.com> wrote: >> Rafael, >> >> Please bracket portions of your changes that involve modification of >> C/C++ source code. For cases of modifying configuration scripts and >> make files, use your
2008 Mar 11
0
[LLVMdev] NewNightlyTester.pl: split into phases?
On Mar 11, 2008, at 8:14 AM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > Am Samstag, den 08.03.2008, 14:02 -0800 schrieb Tanya Lattner: >> - ability to check out llvm-gcc or update llvm-gcc and build it >> before >> running tests. > > This seems to be a bit more complicated than I thought. There are > variations in the build process depending on whether it's a Darwin >