similar to: [LLVMdev] planning to attend the LLVM Developer's Meeting

On Oct 9, 2009, at 8:40 AM, Stuart Hastings wrote: > > On Oct 8, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > >> On Oct 8, 2009, at 4:52 PM, Stuart Hastings wrote: >>> Currently, to get LLVM to build "Apple-style," it's necessary to >>> copy two files (utils/buildit/GNUmakefile and utils/buildit/ >>> build_llvm) into the top-level directory.

On Oct 8, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > On Oct 8, 2009, at 4:52 PM, Stuart Hastings wrote: >> Currently, to get LLVM to build "Apple-style," it's necessary to >> copy two files (utils/buildit/GNUmakefile and utils/buildit/ >> build_llvm) into the top-level directory. > > Why not: > > $ RC_ARCHS="x86" make > echo Apple Build.

On May 12, 2011, at 12:30 AM, Sandeep Patel wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Stuart Hastings <stuart at apple.com> wrote: >> >> On May 9, 2011, at 1:41 PM, Renato Golin wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >>> One example is the struct byval. The ARM back-end still doesn't >>> support struct byval (maybe now it does, I was away for a

On Jul 6, 2009, at 5:24 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Stuart Hastings<stuart at apple.com> > wrote: >> IANACE (I Am Not A Configury Expert :-), but I've been asked to >> reconfigure LLVM and LLVM-GCC to build with LLVM-GCC (perhaps more >> accurately, LLVM-G++). > > The attached patches affect the *tests*, not the actual builds

We are scheduling another meeting to discuss Theora matters. One of these was planned just a while ago, but it pretty much didn't happen. So let's make this one happen. Anyone interested in Theora or video technologies is welcome to attend. The place is #xiphmeet at irc.freenode.net, this Tuesday at 14:00 UTC. If you don't know when 14:00 UTC is, go here[1] for conversion into

We are scheduling another meeting to discuss Theora matters. One of these was planned just a while ago, but it pretty much didn't happen. So let's make this one happen. Anyone interested in Theora or video technologies is welcome to attend. The place is #xiphmeet at irc.freenode.net, this Tuesday at 14:00 UTC. If you don't know when 14:00 UTC is, go here[1] for conversion into

We are scheduling another meeting to discuss Theora matters. One of these was planned just a while ago, but it pretty much didn't happen. So let's make this one happen. Anyone interested in Theora or video technologies is welcome to attend. The place is #xiphmeet at irc.freenode.net, this Tuesday at 14:00 UTC. If you don't know when 14:00 UTC is, go here[1] for conversion into

IANACE (I Am Not A Configury Expert :-), but I've been asked to reconfigure LLVM and LLVM-GCC to build with LLVM-GCC (perhaps more accurately, LLVM-G++). The patches to do this are short. In the LLVM tree, this suffices; it looks for LLVM-GCC first, and if that fails, falls back to GCC: Index: llvm.test/autoconf/configure.ac

Your are invited to attend the 2016 LLVM Developers’ Meeting <http://llvm.org/devmtg/2016-11/> on November 3-4 in San Jose, CA. Registration will open today, July 1, at 5:00PM PDT. You may register here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/2016-llvm-developers-meeting-bay-area-tickets-26043992282 <https://www.eventbrite.com/e/2016-llvm-developers-meeting-bay-area-tickets-26043992282>

hi all, I am sorry but i can not attend the developer's meeting. But reading through the page it sounds like a very interesting venue. So it would be a great thing if we could have slides as pdfs available on the web site. thanks in advance -- Jakob ps: it is funny that most compiler suites are not named after something very interesting. gcc, icc, ... are all something like xxx compiler

On Oct 9, 2009, at 12:34 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > > On Oct 9, 2009, at 8:40 AM, Stuart Hastings wrote: > >> >> On Oct 8, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Mike Stump wrote: >> >>> On Oct 8, 2009, at 4:52 PM, Stuart Hastings wrote: >>>> Currently, to get LLVM to build "Apple-style," it's necessary to >>>> copy two files

On Oct 8, 2009, at 4:52 PM, Stuart Hastings wrote: > Currently, to get LLVM to build "Apple-style," it's necessary to > copy two files (utils/buildit/GNUmakefile and utils/buildit/ > build_llvm) into the top-level directory. Why not: $ RC_ARCHS="x86" make echo Apple Build. Apple Build. $ make echo Standard Build Standard Build $ cat Makefile ifneq

On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Stuart Hastings<stuart at apple.com> wrote: =================================================================== > --- llvm-gcc.test/configure.in  (revision 74729) > +++ llvm-gcc.test/configure.in  (working copy) > @@ -993,10 +993,10 @@ >    # APPLE LOCAL begin dynamic-no-pic >    i[[3456789]]86-*-darwin*) >    

Please make sure when we are running the llvm test suite the "native" executables are still built with gcc (or another compiler) unless it's explicitly specified to be llvm-gcc. Thanks. Evan On Jul 6, 2009, at 3:47 PM, Stuart Hastings wrote: > IANACE (I Am Not A Configury Expert :-), but I've been asked to > reconfigure LLVM and LLVM-GCC to build with LLVM-GCC

On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Stuart Hastings<stuart at apple.com> wrote: > IANACE (I Am Not A Configury Expert :-), but I've been asked to > reconfigure LLVM and LLVM-GCC to build with LLVM-GCC (perhaps more > accurately, LLVM-G++). The attached patches affect the *tests*, not the actual builds themselves; is that intentional? -Eli

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Stuart Hastings <stuart at apple.com> wrote: > > On May 9, 2011, at 1:41 PM, Renato Golin wrote: > > [snip] > >> One example is the struct byval. The ARM back-end still doesn't >> support struct byval (maybe now it does, I was away for a while), > > The ARM backend now supports struct byval for APCS.  Extending it to

On 12 May 2011 15:43, Stuart Hastings <stuart at apple.com> wrote: > I'm not familiar with AAPCS-VFP, but I'd assume that any byval struct should be passed by value, as if byval didn't exist. Not if the argument(s) fits into the specified registers. There's where the ABI comes in. In a nutshell, the AAPCS-VFP extends the AAPCS to include cases where the arguments are

> On Jul 5, 2016, at 2:29 PM, Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > > I'm curious about the requirement to provide birth date—what's that about? Liability reasons because we serve alcohol at the reception. I can change to age if thats better or ask if someone is under 21 but you may still be asked show ID if a server is unsure. -Tanya > Thanks, >

Thanks, Stuart. Sorry, I had some left-over editing cruft in my email. >From Googling runtest, I had found dejagnu, which I'd heard some folks were using over there, so I used the local package manager to install it. But from what you said I went ahead and got the dejagnu sources and built it, but had problems in running make install, which is trying to put it /usr/local/bin rather than

All: I would like to attend the LLVM Developer's Meeting. Please add me to the list. Sincerely, Mike Engler Adobe Systems, Inc.