similar to: [LLVMdev] Subversion Cutover

On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Reid Spencer wrote: > I know we've cried wolf before, but the conversion of the LLVM projects' > software to use Subversion instead of CVS *WILL* occur on Friday June > 29th with the following approximate schedule: Great, I'm glad to see this happening. Thanks for making it happen. One request: when the change goes live, please make sure the various

All, I know we've cried wolf before, but the conversion of the LLVM projects' software to use Subversion instead of CVS *WILL* occur on Friday June 29th with the following approximate schedule: * 09:00 CDT (14:00 UTC, 07:00 PDT) - CVS becomes read-only (commits prevented) * 09:05 CDT (14:05 UTC, 07:05 PDT) - Final conversion to SVN starts * 11:45 CDT

On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 17:48 -0600, John Criswell wrote: > Dear All, > > I've just heard that there's been a recent discussion on the IRC channel > about moving the LLVM source repository from CVS to Subversion (SVN) and > that this migration may happen "soon." Yes, its been talked about for ages and its time to do it. We've debated the choice of repositories

Chris: It was in the 1.5 release but not subsequent to that. You can find this by looking for the file in the branches that were converted from subversion. You can find the file you're looking for here: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_15/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LowerConstantExprs.cpp?view=log Reid. On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 14:29 -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: > On

Dear LLVMers, The first phase of the Subversion conversion is complete. The CVS repository will no longer be available. You will now need to use the SVN server. Directions for getting LLVM from the SVN server can be found in the new Getting Started Guide (http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html). If you run a nightly tester, you should update your LLVM tree from SVN to get the new

Dear All, I've just heard that there's been a recent discussion on the IRC channel about moving the LLVM source repository from CVS to Subversion (SVN) and that this migration may happen "soon." Is such a migration being planned, and if so, what is the timeframe? How will the migration be performed? I and other LLVM users have deadlines in the near future, so we would like to

Rafael, On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 16:05 -0300, Rafael Espíndola wrote: > Just wondering: Is there any plan to move to svn? I would love to have > a diff command that works when I am offline :-) Its been discussed from time to time. I would like to see this as well, but for an additional reasons: simpler branch management and faster updates, etc. SVN handles directories better and merging head

All, At 0900 CDT tomorrow (1400 UTC) the Subversion migration will begin. At that time, CVS will be put in read-only mode while the conversion to Subversion is made. We expect the Subversion repository to be up and running 3 hours later at about 1200 CDT, 1000 PDT, or 1700 UTC. If you haven't got your subversion client yet, please do so now. If you host a nightly test, please get the latest

Just wondering: Is there any plan to move to svn? I would love to have a diff command that works when I am offline :-) Best Regards, Rafael

Hi everybody, Is there a gem or something for working directly with Subversion from a RoR app? Thanks, Tiffani A.B. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060727/26846e72/attachment-0001.html

I've cut all externally visible xiph.org services over to a new server on a bigger line. Chances are, most of you wouldn't have noticed the change. However, for the next day or two (as DNS propogates), xiph.org may get you snotfish (the old server) or motherfish (the new server). CVS on snotfish is now gone (that's on motherfish), although snotfish will continue answering DNS/

All, Here's an update on the Developer's Meeting. I've created a page for the meeting on the main web site at http://llvm.org/DevMtgMay2007.html. If you want to find out the latest, please visit that page. From here on out, I will be tracking the meeting's progress on that page. However, I'll still send out one of these update notes when there are significant developments.

I can't make it on the 22nd, but I will be there if it's on the 29th. Ryan Brown On 3/23/07, Reid Spencer <rspencer at reidspencer.com> wrote: > Hi Sarah, > > On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 15:11 -0700, Sarah Thompson wrote: > > I'll almost certainly come along, possibly with one or two other NASA > > people. > > Great! If/when you know their names, have them

Just a reminder that the scheduled service interruptions will begin in approximately one hour. Reid. On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 22:27 -0700, Reid Spencer wrote: > Just a reminder that the scheduled shutdown will begin in less than 12 > hours. > > Reid. > > On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 15:57 -0700, Reid Spencer wrote: > > All, > > > > The web server and subversion will

Hello, All services have been successfully migrated to our new facility. Unfortunately, NetSol once again displayed a brilliant inability to grasp a clue using both hands and a suction cup, and informed us they *might* get around to updating DNS records in about two weeks. If we could fax them enough identification. Needless to say, they've lost our business and our domain transfers should

Hello, All services have been successfully migrated to our new facility. Unfortunately, NetSol once again displayed a brilliant inability to grasp a clue using both hands and a suction cup, and informed us they *might* get around to updating DNS records in about two weeks. If we could fax them enough identification. Needless to say, they've lost our business and our domain transfers should

Hello, All services have been successfully migrated to our new facility. Unfortunately, NetSol once again displayed a brilliant inability to grasp a clue using both hands and a suction cup, and informed us they *might* get around to updating DNS records in about two weeks. If we could fax them enough identification. Needless to say, they've lost our business and our domain transfers should

Hello, All services have been successfully migrated to our new facility. Unfortunately, NetSol once again displayed a brilliant inability to grasp a clue using both hands and a suction cup, and informed us they *might* get around to updating DNS records in about two weeks. If we could fax them enough identification. Needless to say, they've lost our business and our domain transfers should

Hello, All services have been successfully migrated to our new facility. Unfortunately, NetSol once again displayed a brilliant inability to grasp a clue using both hands and a suction cup, and informed us they *might* get around to updating DNS records in about two weeks. If we could fax them enough identification. Needless to say, they've lost our business and our domain transfers should

Hello, All services have been successfully migrated to our new facility. Unfortunately, NetSol once again displayed a brilliant inability to grasp a clue using both hands and a suction cup, and informed us they *might* get around to updating DNS records in about two weeks. If we could fax them enough identification. Needless to say, they've lost our business and our domain transfers should