similar to: [LLVMdev] Third party integration

Dear guys, I want to coalesce some copies, and I would like to know if there is any method that I can call, like JoinCopy from the old (LLVM 1.9) LiveIntervals class. I found it in SimpleRegisterCoalescing (LLVM 2.1), but I do not want to call this analysis, as I have my own. basically, I can determine that two virtuals do not overlap, and I know that it is safe to join them. In

Good morning, I am trying to build nut 2.1, and having a problem with autoreconf. I know I had this problem a while back, and resolved it, but for the life of me I can't remember how, and I can't find the info that must have led me in the right direction. I reloaded the PC today, and now when I run autoreconf I get the following output: upsbox:/pub/trunk2# autoreconf

I am a relative R newbie and I am having trouble with reshape() on R V1.9.1 on Linux. The same code appears to be ok when run on R V2.2.0 on Windows and a V2.1 on Linux. Any help would be great as I need to stay on V1.9 for the immediate future... Thanks, Reid Hutchins df <- data.frame(state= rep(1:2, each=8), school=rep(1:2,each=4), class=rep(1:2,each=2),Values2Columns=rep(1:2,

When using the tis time series package (v1.9), I cannot select or alter a subset of a time series when the time series is created from a matrix and the matrix contains NA values. Example: x<-tis(t(c(1:10,NA)), start=c(2000,1), freq=12) x[x>0]<-0 The second line yields "Error in if (any(i > nrow(x))) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed" However, both of the following

On Dec 15, 2007, at 4:45 PM, Fernando Magno Quintao Pereira wrote: > > Dear guys, > > I want to coalesce some copies, and I would like to know if > there is > any method that I can call, like JoinCopy from the old (LLVM 1.9) > LiveIntervals class. I found it in SimpleRegisterCoalescing (LLVM > 2.1), > but I do not want to call this analysis, as I have my own.

In the hope of some meaningful response and ignoring the risk of further abuse, let me try to clarify the issue here. I have re-read the 'Writing R Extensions' manual. It seems to me that it clearly says R API functions can be called from from C++ programs, and the API includes the special values ISNAN() and R_FINITE() and the missing test ISNA(). R_FINITE is no problem. It is

Samba Users: We have Samba v1.9. and are having a small difficulty with the "socket options" and "??? timeout" parameters. When we set it to ?TCP_NODELAY, our log file indicates "Failed to set socket option TCP_NODELAY". This also happened on an earlier version of Samba as well. Has anyone else had a similar problem and found a solution? Also, when setting

hola, tengo dos vectores de 1134 y 385 elementos que se corresponden con números de accesión de genes. Necesito saber que números son comunes o intersección de vectores. He utilizado intersect(x,y) y me da todo el rato un único valor: V1 V1.1 V1.2 V1.3 V1.4 V1.5 V1.6 V1.7 V1.8 V1.9 V1.10 V1.11 V1.12 1 AJ558305 AJ558305 AJ558305 AJ558305 AJ558305

As I understand it lme (in R v1.9.x) estimates random effect variances on a log scale, constraining them to be positive. Whilst this seems sensible, it does lead to apparently biased estimates if the variance is actually zero - which makes our simulation results look strange. Whilst we need to think a bit deeper about it - I still haven't got my head around what a negative variance could

Hi, just in the process of updating my packages for R v2.0.0 and I have not had time to followed the R v2.0.0 discussions so maybe my questions have already been answered. A concern I have is that when creating packages they should be backward compatible with R v1.9.x for a while until all users and computers has migrated to R v2.0.x. It is pretty straightforward to setup my packages so that

Hi list, I hope this isn't in error but if it is I apologize. I have a small project request on hand where the clients want their customers to be able to dial in to conduct business over the phone in a completely automated manner. From my limited understanding this looks a lot like a call center where one has to build some sort of proxy that understands their business logic and that can

Here it is, a missing file "analyze.1" :- /usr/bin/groff -Tps -man /usr/build/llvm/docs/CommandGuide/analyze.1 > /usr/buil d/llvm/docs/CommandGuide/analyze.ps troff: fatal error: can't open `/usr/build/llvm/docs/CommandGuide/analyze.1': No such file or directory make[2]: *** [/usr/build/llvm/docs/CommandGuide/analyze.ps] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory

Turns out I did not have Perl installed and hence no pod2man command, so it was not groff after all. But 'true', what ever it does, does not seem to be working on Cygwin. true pod2man --release=1.5 --center="LLVM Command Guide" /usr/build/llvm/../../src/llvm-1.5/docs/CommandGuide/analyze.pod /usr/build/llvm/docs/CommandGuide/analyze.1 'true' seems to behaving like a

I am starting to see a few issues with OCFS and 9.2.0.3 RAC on redHat Linux AS 2.1. Wondering if there is anyone out there experiencing similar issues... a few pointers to the issues.. 1. OCFS read/write performance is way lower than a read/write to a raw device.. i can give you some comparison numbers.. 2. Writes to shared disk with ocfs would get locked up by one server.. it doesnt have to

I am starting to see a few issues with OCFS and 9.2.0.3 RAC on redHat Linux AS 2.1. Wondering if there is anyone out there experiencing similar issues... a few pointers to the issues.. 1. OCFS read/write performance is way lower than a read/write to a raw device.. i can give you some comparison numbers.. 2. Writes to shared disk with ocfs would get locked up by one server.. it doesnt have to

Aaron Gray wrote: > Turns out I did not have Perl installed and hence no pod2man command, so > it was not groff after all. > > But 'true', what ever it does, does not seem to be working on Cygwin. > > true pod2man --release=1.5 --center="LLVM Command Guide" > /usr/build/llvm/../../src/llvm-1.5/docs/CommandGuide/analyze.pod >

Am back to the same llvm 'make install' errors as I had before :- Two trivial ones, of uncreated directories :- llvm[2]: Installing Debug /usr/llvm/bin/llvm-ranlib /usr/bin/install: target `/usr/llvm/bin/llvm-ranlib' is not a directory make[2]: *** [/usr/llvm/bin/llvm-ranlib] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/build/llvm/tools/llvm-ranlib' make[1]: ***

Hi Guys , We enabled the LTO on our code base and found that LTO uses the integrated/builtin assembler to emit the final optimized code .O (FileType= CGFT_ObjectFile) . Can we bypass this semantic ,for something like you emit .S file (FileType=CGFT_AssemblyFile), Then we pass this .S file to our native assembler and the linker .....any switch/ options do so ? i.e something like as we have

I've read through the docs, but honestly this is driving me crazy and I shouldn't have to fight this hard to just to write some documentation. Here's the problem: Look at llvm/docs/CommandGuide/FileCheck.rst I want to add a table of contents that looks like this [ http://llvm.org/docs/CMake.html] to that file. Nothing I've tried works. (Also, no I'm not trying to add it in

> On Aug 9, 2016, at 9:24 AM, Kevin Choi via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > -Wl,--plugin=LLVMgold.so,--plugin-opt=emit-llvm This is totally Gold specific. The fact that he mentions using LTOCodeGenerator makes me think that he does not use Gold. > > http://llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/opt.html <http://llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/opt.html> >