Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] llvm-test cvs head not working"
2007 Mar 06
1
[LLVMdev] using dsa
How do I acquire that version of DSA that you've updated to mainline
cvs? Do I still check out llvm-poolalloc, or is there a way to only
check out DSA?
Patrick Meredith wrote:
> I updated dsa to mainline cvs. Poolalloc is broken, however.
>
> On Mar 6, 2007, at 3:39 AM, Ryan M. Lefever wrote:
>
>> What versions of llvm and llvm-poolalloc should I check out of cvs, in
2007 Mar 06
0
[LLVMdev] using dsa
I updated dsa to mainline cvs. Poolalloc is broken, however.
On Mar 6, 2007, at 3:39 AM, Ryan M. Lefever wrote:
> What versions of llvm and llvm-poolalloc should I check out of cvs, in
> order to use DSA? In a previous post John Criswell suggested checking
> llvm and llvm-poolalloc out of cvs using the -r release_19 flag.
> However, there were several post later that said that
2007 Mar 06
3
[LLVMdev] using dsa
What versions of llvm and llvm-poolalloc should I check out of cvs, in
order to use DSA? In a previous post John Criswell suggested checking
llvm and llvm-poolalloc out of cvs using the -r release_19 flag.
However, there were several post later that said that changes should not
be made to the release_19 branch.
At any rate, I've not seen any update on which versions of llvm and
2007 Mar 07
2
[LLVMdev] using dsa
Thank you Patrick! For anyone interested, I was able to get the
mainline version of DSA to compile with the mainline version of LLVM.
As Patrick pointed out, the mainline version of PoolAllocate does not
compile with the mainline version of LLVM. So, I made a small change to
llvm-poolalloc/lib/Makefile in which I removed PoolAllocate from the line:
PARALLEL_DIRS=DSA PoolAllocate
After
2007 Mar 06
1
[LLVMdev] [Fwd: Re: using dsa]
Forgot to hit "Reply All."
-- John T.
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu>
Subject: Re: using dsa
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 09:53:43 -0600
Size: 3103
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20070306/ef7c2f29/attachment.mht>
2007 Feb 06
1
[LLVMdev] llvm-poolalloc compilation failed
Chris,
I performed the steps you gave below to check out llvm-poolalloc. When
I want to get new updates made to llvm-poolalloc, do I perform the
following commands?
cvs -d :pserver:anon at llvm.org:/var/cvs/llvm login
<Hit return for an empty password>
cd llvm/projects
cvs -d :pserver:anon at llvm.org:/var/cvs/llvm update -r release_19
llvm-poolalloc
In other words, do I specify the
2007 Aug 16
3
[LLVMdev] c const
I guess Bill Wendling cleared it up a little more for me. Neither llvm
nor gcc ignore const. The type checking in each of their frontends
makes sure that const is not violated.
The reason I was asking about const is as follows. I was under the
impression that const was part of c to aid the compiler with
optimization and not just for type checking purposes. As you previously
pointed out,
2007 Aug 15
0
[LLVMdev] c const
I don't follow what you mean - gcc doesn't ignore const and llvm
doesn't deviate from gcc nor from the relevant language standards.
Note that if you declare a global as const that we do capture this in
the ir - what specifically do you want? Please provide an example.
-Chris
http://nondot.org/sabre
http://llvm.org
On Aug 14, 2007, at 11:58 PM, "Ryan M. Lefever"
2010 Dec 29
1
[LLVMdev] Latest trunk fails to build on Mac using CMake and Eclipse
[ 96%] Checking for cyclic dependencies between LLVM libraries.
cd /Users/samuraicrow/Documents/workspace/llvm-trunk-build/tools/llvm-config &&
"/Applications/CMake 2.8-3.app/Contents/bin/cmake" -E remove -f
/Users/samuraicrow/Documents/workspace/llvm-trunk-build/tools/llvm-config/FinalLibDeps.txt
2009 Apr 25
1
[LLVMdev] Release build failure (FinalLibDeps.txt: No such file or directory)
$ make update
...snip...
Updated to revision 69967.
$ ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1 make
...snip...
llvm[1]: Regenerating LibDeps.txt.tmp
llvm[1]: Checking for cyclic dependencies between LLVM libraries.
find-cycles.pl: Circular dependency between *.a files:
find-cycles.pl: libLLVMAsmPrinter.a libLLVMCodeGen.a
libLLVMSelectionDAG.a
llvm[1]: Building llvm-config script.
cat:
2011 Jan 13
2
[LLVMdev] Circular Deps from CMake build using makefile
[ 73%] Regenerating
/Users/samuraicrow/Documents/workspace/llvm-trunk-build/tools/llvm-config/LibDeps.txt.tmp
[ 73%] Updating
/Users/samuraicrow/Documents/workspace/llvm-trunk-build/tools/llvm-config/LibDeps.txt
if necessary...
[ 73%] Checking for cyclic dependencies between LLVM libraries.
find-cycles.pl: Circular dependency between *.a files:
find-cycles.pl: libLLVMAsmPrinter.a
2007 Feb 13
0
[LLVMdev] using dsa from llvm-poolalloc
Ryan M. Lefever wrote:
> I have a few questions on using dsa now that it has been moved out of
> llvm. I have llvm -r release_19 checked out from cvs, and
> llvm-poolalloc -r release_19 checked out from cvs into the projects
> directory, as John Criswell previously suggested.
>
> 1) I have some compiler transforms that I'm writing that use DSA. They
> can no longer
2007 Aug 15
3
[LLVMdev] c const
I don't mean to be a pain, but I was thinking about this a bit more.
Does gcc ignore the const keyword? If not, why has LLVM chosen to
deviate from gcc with respect to the const keyword? If so, then why do
we bother using const in LLVM API code? I'm just curious and wanted to
understand the thinking behind not preserving const.
Thanks,
Ryan
Chris Lattner wrote:
> This property
2011 Jan 13
0
[LLVMdev] Circular Deps from CMake build using makefile
Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> writes:
> [ 73%] Regenerating
> /Users/samuraicrow/Documents/workspace/llvm-trunk-build/tools/llvm-config/LibDeps.txt.tmp
>
> [ 73%] Updating
> /Users/samuraicrow/Documents/workspace/llvm-trunk-build/tools/llvm-config/LibDeps.txt
> if necessary...
> [ 73%] Checking for cyclic dependencies between LLVM libraries.
>
2007 Jan 24
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-poolalloc compilation failed
Vikram S. Adve wrote:
> This kind of regression is a fallout of having some code live in
> separate CVS modules as "projects." It would help to have someone
> volunteer to maintain each project, which can be as little as making
> sure it continues to compile or as much as supporting it with answers
> to questions and bug fixes. Here is the current list of projects:
2008 Nov 04
3
[LLVMdev] fPIC
Does llvm-gcc support the -fPIC option? I am using LLVM on both 32 bit
linux and 64 bit linux, if that matters.
Regards,
Ryan
--
Ryan M. Lefever [http://www.crhc.uiuc.edu/~lefever/index.html]
2011 Sep 29
2
[LLVMdev] r140697 broke building with shared library enabled
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/hkultala26/src/llvm-trunk/llvm/tools/llvm-config'
llvm[1]: Regenerating LibDeps.txt.tmp
llvm[1]: Checking for cyclic dependencies between LLVM libraries.
find-cycles.pl: Circular dependency between *.a files:
find-cycles.pl: libLLVMPTXAsmPrinter.a libLLVMPTXCodeGen.a libLLVMPTXDesc.a
llvm[1]: Building llvm-config script.
cat:
2008 Nov 04
0
[LLVMdev] fPIC
Yup!
-bw
On Nov 3, 2008, at 7:39 PM, Ryan M. Lefever wrote:
> Does llvm-gcc support the -fPIC option? I am using LLVM on both 32
> bit
> linux and 64 bit linux, if that matters.
>
> Regards,
> Ryan
>
> --
> Ryan M. Lefever [http://www.crhc.uiuc.edu/~lefever/index.html]
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
>
2007 Apr 10
0
[LLVMdev] cvs opt broken?
This has been reported.
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1317
On 4/10/07, Ryan M. Lefever <lefever at crhc.uiuc.edu> wrote:
>
> I checked out llvm from cvs & llvm-gcc from svn last night and again
> tonight. Each time they compiled and installed fine. After installing
> them, I recompiled compiler transforms I had written for opt. opt seems
> to load the my
2007 Aug 08
0
[LLVMdev] c const
This property isn't preserved on the llvm ir, because const can always
be cast away. If you want mod information, then I suggest using the
aliasanalysis interface to get mod ref info for a call.
-Chris
http://nondot.org/sabre
http://llvm.org
On Aug 8, 2007, at 12:07 AM, "Ryan M. Lefever" <lefever at crhc.uiuc.edu>
wrote:
> How is c's const keyword translated