similar to: [LLVMdev] PR411 Has Landed

Hi Everyone, I'm happy to say that LLVM has made many leaps and bounds since the last update in November. Because we are bumping the major version number with this release, we're letting the release go for twice as long as our planned release schedule (6 months instead of 3). We are currently half way through the LLVM 2.0 development cycle. So far, many important and invasive changes

Developers, As part of PR411, I have made several of the intrinsic functions non- overloaded. While the assembler and bytecode reader are backwards compatible, front-end writers should start using the non-overloaded versions of the intrinsics. The llvm-gcc has already been updated to generate the new intrinsic names. Other front-ends will start seeing warnings about the names of intrinsics that

Hello, I've started seeing the following warning in 3.11-rc2. [In the interest of full disclosure, I do have a patch applied that tries to implement drm_planes, which I might have done completely incorrectly, but looking around it doesn't seem related. I'm definitely not invoking any of the planes functionality right now. See http://paste.debian.net/hidden/cf8b3a2, plus a call to the

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 05:27:45PM -0800, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith wrote: > +zalman at google.com > Hi Duncan, This patch plus another small change fixes the assertion failure for me. With the patch alone, the void* overload of addGarbageObject() was being used by MDNode::getTemporary(), so I had to cast the object as an MDNode*: diff --git a/lib/IR/Metadata.cpp b/lib/IR/Metadata.cpp

I have a data file that looks like this class pigeon falcon propeller jet wing fly birds 25 37 0 0 2 1 planes 0 1 28 40 1 3 birds 19 41 0 1 4 6 planes 0 0 25 50 5 5 planes 1 0

I committed: r224058 = 966942da9e68b59c31ce770e7f94c55a63482c6b r224060 = da75f7277e3a129aed8ef8aa4e0d84de40b76fd4 r224061 = f88e4c8e9171045454b2c8e05054c2af8da3fe4f Let me know if somehow you're still hitting the problem. r224061 removes leak detection entirely from `MachineInstr`. There aren't any leaks to be had there, since they're allocated in a custom allocator. They're

Hello, I have a couple of doubts, as listed below: 1. To list all the global variables in the module, I am iterating using type_iterator and for each Type I get, I am using value_iterator to iterate over Values . In the second iteration I am getting unexpected results. For each type obtained from type_iterator->second, value_iterator->first produces the same list as what

> On 2014-Dec-18, at 01:43, Keno Fischer <kfischer at college.harvard.edu> wrote: > > Hi Duncan, > > I'm in the following situation for which this change caused an assertion failure: > > Three modules, let's say A B C > Two function, F in A, G in B > > Now I CloneFunction F into B (call the new function F') and inline F' into G. > Now,

Hi, I need some help to get some of the object orientation, specifically the methods that overload the basic arithmetic operations, from sample C++ code to R. I don't have experience with such advanced language features inside of R. So I was wondering if some of you could help me out in this regard. I have written a simple demonstration of a forward mode automatic differentiator in C++ and

For those that like to assist in the testing of rsync, the CVS version now defaults to doing an incremental file-list scan when it is recursing through the directories. This avoids keeping the whole file list in memory, and allows the transfer to start working on changed files before it has completed the recursive scan of the sending side. The code appears to be working well so far, but there

Hi, I need some help to get some of the object orientation, specifically the methods that overload the basic arithmetic operations, from sample C++ code to R. I don't have experience with such advanced language features inside of R. So I was wondering if some of you could help me out in this regard. I have written a simple demonstration of a forward mode automatic differentiator in C++ and

On Aug 10, 2018, at 9:35 PM, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote: > > Part of me is still concerned with the future, and the filesystems which are yet to exist. > Me too. But it is best to target modern systems when targeting future systems adds an unnecessary cost. When future systems come into being, it is likely because future hardware is making those future systems

Hi David, The error shows that the clang source code uses this intrinsic as well, but in the old form. You need to modify the clang source code (where this intrinsic is used) to consider the overloaded operands. The assert would show the trace where clang uses this intrinsic. Hope this helps, Anna > On Jul 26, 2016, at 3:21 PM, David Noursi via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>

I am trying to graph two planes on the same graph using persp(). I can only get one plane to plot at a time. Can someone explain how I can graph two planes on the same graph using persp? I've looked throught the documentation, but cannot find any references to appending a persp plot. Thanks. Sincerely yours, Mark J. Lamias Statistical Consultant

Hello All, I have been modifying LLVM a project of mine, and have encountered issues with overloading an intrinsic function. I have defined two types, abit (which is mapped, in Intrinsics.td, to i128) and qbit (accordingly mapped to i16). I would like my intrinsic function, CNOT(x,y), to accept either an abit or a qbit for each argument, so I overload with iAny and llvm_anyint_ty, as seemed to

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82118 Priority: medium Bug ID: 82118 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: nouveau tearing with xvideo QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter: lameventanas at gmail.com

Hi, I pulled compiz from GIT yesterday to see if I could get proper multi-head support. I think the current status is great, but I have one little suggestion to make. The current behavior is that we have two viewpoints of the "cube" (it's more like a body with eight side planes now). If it's rotated one step we skip one of the planes. Rotating four times is enough to go round

I have drawn a 3D scatter plot : library(mnormt) library(scatterplot3d) dat = cbind(rmnorm(3, rep(0,2), diag(2)), 1:3) scatterplot3d(dat) Now I want to do 2 things : 1 : In the Z-axis (i.e. height), I want to see only numbers 1,2,3, etc NOT, 1,1.5,2,2.5............. 2. I want to add two Horizontal planes at hight z=2 and z=3. Those two planes should look like "bottom" of that 3D plot

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 09:47:49PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Fri, 11 May 2018 20:29:48 +0300 > Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 07:12:21PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > On Fri, 11 May 2018 19:54:02 +0300 > > > Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote: > > >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hello all, I hope someone can help me with this issue, I have the SVN file_column and using LoginEngine/UserEngine with Rails 1.1.2. My issue is that I''m overloading the view for LoginEngine to support a file image upload as part of the user record and having a heck of a time doing so. Near the bottom of my new _edit.rhtml