similar to: [LLVMdev] Backend to start with

Hello. I have been trying to check, how llvm works on Solaris recently. First I have tested lli, whitch seems to execute the bytecode generated on Linux without any problems. However, llc has failed to generate valid SPARC assembler code even on the helloworld example. Here is the generated code: sakharov at trillian:~$ cat ./test.s .text .align 16 .globl main

Hello everyone, I am running an Enterprise 250 with Dual UltraSparc II's and 2 Gb ram running Aurora Sparc Linux 2.0 (2.6.13 kernel for Aurora is based on Fedora Core 3). GCC version 3.4.2. I built llvm-2.0 (the svn version) by just typing "./configure;make". I then downloaded clang from the svn repository (revision 40382) and changed to it's directory under

Hi, There are some generated Sparc assembly code like this: main: ! @main ! BB#0: save %sp, -112, %sp sethi 0, %l0 or %g0, 5, %l1 st %l0, [%fp+-4] st %l1, [%fp+-8] st %l1, [%fp+-12] sethi %hi(.L.str), %l1 ld [%fp+-8], %o1 add %l1, %lo(.L.str), %l1 or %g0, %l1, %o0 call printf nop ld [%fp+-12], %o2 ld [%fp+-8], %l2 sethi %hi(.L.strQ521), %l3 add

On Jun 26, 2013, at 4:18 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > So inverting it so that MI contains LLVM IR instead of the other way > around? Then we'd need a serialization format for MI that happened to > include a way of serializing LLVM IR within. From a quick "hey, this > seems reasonable" the idea of embedding the MI into the IR rather than

The parts of klibc specific to the sparc architecture. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> --- commit 1b5c93603ed3460ed1fba9e5d453a6fa54d0ccce tree 7fb0a134b3add408c02b470616d440ad398d86d3 parent 94473ed85b00ec45ff8ee6cac62f60a368ff4534 author H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> Sun, 25 Jun 2006 16:58:47 -0700 committer H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> Sun, 25 Jun

On Oct 7, 2014, at 2:26 PM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > On 7 October 2014 10:50, Dmitry Borisenkov <d.borisenkov at samsung.com> wrote: >> fpfail.s:26: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `ret' >> >> I downloaded Intel manual and haven’t found any mention of retl instruction, > > "retl" is the

Hi, I have the following test code print.c: #include <stdio.h> int main(){ fprintf(stderr, "Error!\n"); return 0; } I did the following on linux to cross-compile it for Sparc architecture: clang -m32 -c print.c -emit-llvm -o print.bc (or llvm-gcc -m32 -c print.c -emit-llvm -o print.bc) llvm-dis < print.bc -o print2.bc llc -march=sparc -mcpu=v8 print2.bc -o print_s.s if

On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jun 26, 2013, at 3:51 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > Can you suggest an alternative solution? Can you describe why you don't > think metadata is the right container? This alone isn't really helpful at > moving us toward something that there has been

On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 wilsonk at cpsc.ucalgary.ca wrote: Hi Kelly, Sorry for the delay, I'm way behind in email :( > I built llvm-2.0 (the svn version) by just typing "./configure;make". I > then downloaded clang from the svn repository (revision 40382) and changed > to it's directory under .../llvm/tools/clang. I did a "make" without > incident for clang,

On Jul 31, 2008, at 9:57 AM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > > On Jul 31, 2008, at 4:52 AMPDT, Richard Pennington wrote: > >> Any code that I generate for the Sparc fails at assembly time using a >> gas assembler built for the Sparc. >> >> I get code like the following from the code generator: >> >> save -96, %o6, %o6 >> >> and get a syntax

Any code that I generate for the Sparc fails at assembly time using a gas assembler built for the Sparc. I get code like the following from the code generator: .text .align 16 .globl main .type main, #function main: save -96, %o6, %o6 and get a syntax error on the save instruction. I think sparc syntax should be: .text .align

Hi all, I have a server with an Athlon 64 3200 and Fedora Core 2 x86_64. I have compiled and installed Asterisk 1.0.6 without any problems. When I try to make asterisk-addons-1.0.6 it say me: [root@server1 asterisk-addons-1.0.6]# make ./mkdep -fPIC -I../asterisk -D_GNU_SOURCE -I/usr/include/mysql `ls *.c` make -C format_mp3 all make[1]: Entering directory

On Jul 31, 2008, at 4:52 AMPDT, Richard Pennington wrote: > Any code that I generate for the Sparc fails at assembly time using a > gas assembler built for the Sparc. > > I get code like the following from the code generator: > > save -96, %o6, %o6 > > and get a syntax error on the save instruction. > > I think sparc syntax should be: > > main: >

Hello everyone. I'm not an expert neither in llvm nor in x86 nor in IEEE standard for floating point numbers, thus any of my following assumptions maybe wrong. If so, I will be grateful if you clarify me what's goes wrong. But if my guesses are correct we possibly have a bug in fp arithmetics on x86. I have the following ir: @g = constant i64 1 define i32 @main() { %gval = load

Hi, Having all sorts of troubles getting mysql cdr support under OS X. Mysql, DBI and DBD all installed and running ok, privileges all set correctly (I think). Latest asterisk-addons checked out of cvs. Keep getting error on make install (implies gcc doesn't support -shared linking, which is wierd): Anyone got mysql cdr support running on OS X? Cheers Rob

Hello maybe someone can help me? I did the CVS checkout and then compiled asterisk Then I tried to compile the addons and got the following (don't understand what's wrong at all and can't find anything about this error on google/wiki) app_addon_sql_mysql.c:164:64: macro "AST_LIST_REMOVE" requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given app_addon_sql_mysql.c: In function

Hi, Know there has been numerous posts on the subject of asterisk-addons and OS X. We have other uses for MySQL on the machine so changing over to Postgres at this point (which apparently works for CDRs) is not really an option. Have also contemplated a cron job to simply poll the csv cdrs and insert them into MySQL. Messy but gets over the short term problem. Compilation problem does

Hi I use RH 9 + asterisk v1.0 stable + 2 PCI fritz cards + chan_capi 3.5 and it works fine, Since my users want fax fonctionnality and customers know 1 of the msm as fax number I wanted to try the chan_capi-0.3.5 patch if I patch chan_capi and run make, I get an error message , as you can read below, orginal chan_capi compile works, when patched I get an error, no CID ? Any idea ? anybody

Hi, i have a problem in assigning 2 conditions to grep() , my data look like this: DA 24 N7 Rad= 3.4 20 Sac= 0.93 Acc= 4.76 DA 24 N7 Rad= 3.4 14 Sac= 0.65 Acc= 3.33 DA 24 N7 Rad= 3.4 3 Sac= 0.14 Acc= 0.71 DA 24 N7 Rad= 3.4 11 Sac= 0.51 Acc= 2.62 DG 23 N7 Rad= 3.4 8 Sac= 0.37 Acc= 1.91 DG 23 N7 Rad= 3.4 5 Sac= 0.23 Acc= 1.19 DG 23 N7 Rad= 3.4 0 Sac= 0.00 Acc= 0.00 DG 23 N7 Rad= 3.4 3 Sac=

Hi Chandler, While doing the performance measurement on a Ivy Bridge, I ran into compile time errors. I saw a bunch of “cannot select" in the LLVM test suite with -march=core-avx-i. E.g., SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.isamax.c is failing at O3 -march=core-avx-i with: fatal error: error in backend: Cannot select: 0x7f91b99a6420: v4i32 = bitcast 0x7f91b99b0e10 [ORD=3] [ID=27]