similar to: [LLVMdev] No crt2.o file found

Hello, Matthew. > My file size matches the patched file. I haven't figured out how to get 7-zip to give me checksum information on windows. Use md5sum utility. It can be successfully found via google. > I rashly copied all the *.o files from my mingw\lib directory to the llvm\lib directory. > This does enable the hello world binary to compile and to function correctly. Strange.

Hello, Matthew. > Not with the recent build. In times past I failed miserably at this using cygwin. Maybe I should try again? Well, actually I mean: whether llvm-gcc binary under consideration was built by yourself or you're using pre-built binaries from downloads section? If you're using llvm-gcc4 binary from downloads section, mingw binary is included into tarball, you might find

/Have you tried to build llvm-gcc by yourself? /Not with the recent build. In times past I failed miserably at this using cygwin. Maybe I should try again? /Normally crt*.o files are built during normal gcc build process (llvm-gcc as well). However, mingw32 runtime has its own crt*.o files, which are included with binary distribution of llvm-gcc4 (mingw32 variant). /I thought that would be

Hello, Matthew > I managed to get the llvm tool chain compiled on my windows machine > using mingw a couple of weeks ago. Have you tried to build llvm-gcc by yourself? > $ llvm-gcc hello.c -o hello.exe > ld: crt2.o: No such file: No such file or directory Normally crt*.o files are built during normal gcc build process (llvm-gcc as well). However, mingw32 runtime has its own crt*.o

I managed to get the llvm tool chain compiled on my windows machine using mingw a couple of weeks ago. When I tried to run the simple test case provided in the documentation I ran into a problem of missing object files. I attempted to compile the simple hello.c hello world application. Unfortunately I get the following $ llvm-gcc hello.c -o hello.exe ld: crt2.o: No such file: No such file

Hello, Matthew. > Hmm there is no llvm-gcc directory in either the patch file or what made it > on to my system. Furthermore there are no crt*.o files after my build until > I put them in the lib directory, which where they are in the patch file. > Again the clean must have removed them. Well. Actually you should have 2 trees: 1. One you're building LLVM in. There is directory

Hello, Matthew. > I figured as much. It would be great to get the mingw branch on > windows working, since it avoids the cygwin dll and some restrictive > licensing issues. Mingw32 branch is quite ok as the time of writing this lines :) I was able to compile Qt with llvm-gcc4 1.9 and everything was fine. So, I suppose something went wrong during unpacking tarball or something like

Hi all, After being able to build llvm and llvm-gcc on windows/mingw, I am running into problems with linking. It seems llvm-gcc isn't able to find crt2.o. Ronald

llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: >Send LLVMdev mailing list submissions to > llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu > >You can reach the person managing the list at

>Win95. Unfortunately, the encoder_example segfaults. I get the same >results from Cygwin as well. Problem solved! (Or rather, worked around...) The problem with the segfault appears to have indeed been with alloca. There is a function _alloca in libgcc.a that comes with the mingw32 distribution of gcc-2.95.2. After examining the generated assembly code from envelope.c (and others),

llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: >Send LLVMdev mailing list submissions to > llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu > >You can reach the person managing the list at

>From: Matthew Bromberg <mattcbro at earthlink.net> >Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 16:21:34 -0500 >The JIT compiler is of course of great interest, but I'm also interested in >static compilation and in fact this seems to me one of the intriguing >features of LLVM, the fact that it can support both static and dynamic >languages, with a common optimization infrastructure. (I

That's certainly on the list of options. I'm doing data gathering right now to see what options there are. I'd prefer not to rashly decide to run off in a direction only to discover this is already a Solved Problem. nomad On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 1:13 PM Bart J. Smit <bart at smits.co.uk> wrote: > What about the REST API to do a graceful shutdown of your VM’s and the >

Hi Thanks for the info, it led to the source of the error I was having. I was using llvm-gcc binaries (built with mingw I guess) to compile a .c file that is my language runtime, llvm-link'ing that with my frontend's .ll, and using an vcpp-built lli to run the resulting bytecode. This caused the special case in X86RegisterInfo::emitPrologue for "main" to try to align the stack

The alloca hook is in lib\System\Win32\DynamicLibrary.inc all the way at the bottom. You'll see a __MING32__ #ifdef around the definition. You just have to implement those methods and it'll work just fine. Jake On 6/24/07, Scott Graham <scott.llvm at h4ck3r.net> wrote: > > Hi > > Thanks for the info, it led to the source of the error I was having. > > I was using

Op 2014-07-07 om 09:24 schreef Jerome Levy: > From: sha0.miller at gmail.com, Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 00:14:27 -0400 > > From: Jerome Levy, Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2014 19:04 > > > > > Thus the rub: The exe seems to have disappeared from winbin as well. It's > > > there, but downloads as a zero-byte file. > > > > Please try clicking the

Baaaaah, phooey! Yeah, get two e-mail clients like I have: Mozilla Thunderbird for Geert and Microsoft Outlook for everyone else I frequently correspond with, who don't want to scroll just to read what's new. Some things just aren't universal, even if one thinks they should be. What a world. - Shao -----Original Message----- From: Syslinux [mailto:syslinux-bounces at zytor.com] On

On Tuesday, July 8, 2014, 5:32:53, Shao Miller wrote: > Baaaaah, phooey! Yeah, get two e-mail clients like I have: Mozilla > Thunderbird for Geert and Microsoft Outlook for everyone else I frequently > correspond with, who don't want to scroll just to read what's new. That's why you trim the irrelevant quotes, and only leave in the parts you're replying to. -- <

Hello, Scott. > Checking the assembly from llc, the first alloca call is to allocate > local vars in _main. Is this just the state of the code at 2.0 when > built with vs.net, or is there something that I've managed to > mis-build locally? _alloca is used to probe the stack, if you asks for locals of size more that 4k. This is pretty ugly, but the names of this functions differs

Package: asterisk Version: 1.6.2.0~dfsg~rc1-1 See below for issue: On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote: > > > On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote: > > >> >> >> On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Dave Chinner wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 06:18:58AM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote: >>>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Dave Chinner wrote: