Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] No crt2.o file found"
2006 Dec 21
0
[LLVMdev] No crt2.o file found
Hello, Matthew.
> > I figured that just copying the mingw crt*.o files would not
> > be a good idea.
>
/Why not? Mingw32 crt does not depend on LLVM.
/I rashly copied all the *.o files from my mingw\lib directory to the llvm\lib directory.
This does enable the hello world binary to compile and to function correctly.
However the byte code file does not work correctly giving:
2006 Dec 18
0
[LLVMdev] No crt2.o file found
/Have you tried to build llvm-gcc by yourself?
/Not with the recent build. In times past I failed miserably at this using cygwin. Maybe I should try again?
/Normally crt*.o files are built during normal gcc build process
(llvm-gcc as well). However, mingw32 runtime has its own crt*.o files,
which are included with binary distribution of llvm-gcc4 (mingw32
variant).
/I thought that would be
2006 Dec 17
0
[LLVMdev] No crt2.o file found
Hello, Matthew
> I managed to get the llvm tool chain compiled on my windows machine
> using mingw a couple of weeks ago.
Have you tried to build llvm-gcc by yourself?
> $ llvm-gcc hello.c -o hello.exe
> ld: crt2.o: No such file: No such file or directory
Normally crt*.o files are built during normal gcc build process
(llvm-gcc as well). However, mingw32 runtime has its own crt*.o
2006 Dec 23
0
[LLVMdev] No crt2.o file found
Hello, Matthew.
> Hmm there is no llvm-gcc directory in either the patch file or what made it
> on to my system. Furthermore there are no crt*.o files after my build until
> I put them in the lib directory, which where they are in the patch file.
> Again the clean must have removed them.
Well. Actually you should have 2 trees:
1. One you're building LLVM in. There is directory
2006 Dec 21
1
[LLVMdev] No crt2.o file found
Hello, Matthew.
> My file size matches the patched file. I haven't figured out how to get 7-zip to give me checksum information on windows.
Use md5sum utility. It can be successfully found via google.
> I rashly copied all the *.o files from my mingw\lib directory to the llvm\lib directory.
> This does enable the hello world binary to compile and to function correctly.
Strange.
2006 Dec 19
0
[LLVMdev] No crt2.o file found
Hello, Matthew.
> I figured as much. It would be great to get the mingw branch on
> windows working, since it avoids the cygwin dll and some restrictive
> licensing issues.
Mingw32 branch is quite ok as the time of writing this lines :) I was
able to compile Qt with llvm-gcc4 1.9 and everything was fine. So, I
suppose something went wrong during unpacking tarball or something like
2006 Dec 16
0
[LLVMdev] No crt2.o file found
I managed to get the llvm tool chain compiled on my windows machine
using mingw a couple of weeks ago.
When I tried to run the simple test case provided in the documentation I
ran into a problem of missing object files.
I attempted to compile the simple hello.c hello world application.
Unfortunately I get the following
$ llvm-gcc hello.c -o hello.exe
ld: crt2.o: No such file: No such file
2009 Oct 02
0
[LLVMdev] Cannot find crt2.o with llvm-gcc on windows/mingw
Hi all,
After being able to build llvm and llvm-gcc on windows/mingw,
I am running into problems with linking.
It seems llvm-gcc isn't able to find crt2.o.
Ronald
2006 Aug 04
0
[LLVMdev] Building llvm under cygwin
On 8/4/06, Anton Korobeynikov <asl at math.spbu.ru> wrote:
>
> Hello Anton
>
> Thu, 3 Aug 2006 23:13:52 +0400 you wrote:
>
> > I won't be available for the next 10-12 hours if you'll need some more
> > files.
> Well. I have one idea. Could you please execute "sort --version" from
> your cygwin shell and let me know, whether it's GNU one
2007 Apr 01
3
[LLVMdev] trouble compiling llvm-gcc4 1.9
I'm having some trouble getting llvm-gcc4 to compile. It's unable to
compile darwin-crt3.c. It's mentioning "Complex expression. Absolute
segment assumed." but I'm not sure if that's a real error message. Has
anyone run into this before? I'm running on a G4 apple 10.4.8, kernel
version 8.6.0. I googled around and found a bug with the same error message:
2006 May 10
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc4 & mingw32
Hello, Everyone.
This is just brief description on building llvm-gcc4 with mingw32.
It's definitely non error-free and contains many "hacks", which should
be eliminated in the future.
1. Prerequisites
We're building in the folowing configuration:
1.1 GCC 3.4.5:
gcc -v
Reading specs from f:/research/mingw/bin/../lib/gcc/mingw32/3.4.5/specs
Configured with:
2006 May 10
0
[LLVMdev] Successfulyl bootsrapped llvm-gcc4 on mingw32
I'm looking forward to your patches and bug reports.
I really want to get this going myself.
-----Original Message-----
From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu]
On Behalf Of Anton Korobeynikov
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 1:22 PM
To: LLVM Developers Mailing List
Subject: [LLVMdev] Successfulyl bootsrapped llvm-gcc4 on mingw32
Hello, Everyone.
Today
2006 May 06
1
[LLVMdev] Still Trying to Build on MINGW
Hello, Greg.
You wrote Saturday, May 6, 2006, 10:24:16 PM:
GP> If anyone has any insight I'd love to hear it.
GP> Meanwhile, I'll continue to investigate...
Currently I'm working on bootstrapping llvm-gcc4 on mingw32 platform.
There are some serious miscompartibilities preventing build. I'll let
know the results.
Anyway, it's common knowledge, that msys itself have
2007 Feb 28
0
[LLVMdev] Cygwin release build error
Hello, Aaron.
> /usr/src/llvm-gcc4/gcc/libgcc2.c: In function '__eprintf':
> /usr/src/llvm-gcc4/gcc/libgcc2.c:1832: internal compiler error:
> Segmentation fault
> Please submit a full bug report,
> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> See <URL:http://llvm.org/bugs> for instructions.
You should:
1. Try to emit bytecode with --emit-llvm compiler switch.
1.1
2007 Feb 28
1
[LLVMdev] Cygwin release build error
Reid & Aaron
> > This is the same error that appears alot of times on the 'make check'
> > of the debug build.
> >
> > What is going on here please ?
>
> Sounds to me like the llvm-gcc being used wasn't configured using
> --with-llvm=. That message occurs when llvm-gcc is built
> "normally" (without using llvm).
Yes. llvm-gcc4
2006 May 10
0
[LLVMdev] Successfulyl bootsrapped llvm-gcc4 on mingw32
Hello, Everyone.
Today I've finished digging into llvm-gcc4 in order to build in under
mingw32. The most trickiest was to make libstdc++ build, since its
configure & makefiles are not so perfect as main gcc ones.
There are several problems with inline assemler (in two places at
least), but both of them are easily seen. Also, there are some
compiler crashes while compiling libiberty (with
2006 Nov 24
1
[LLVMdev] Byte code portability (was Re: libstdc++ as bytecode, and compiling C++ to C)
Hello Philipp.
> Why does it need target libraries and binutils?
gcc building process (and llvm-gcc4 as well) includes building of
target-specific stuff including:
1. Building crt-support code on several platforms
2. Building libgcc.a[.so]
3. Building libstdc++.a[.so]
If you don't want them to be built you should, probably you should
consult gcc documentation to find right options or
2006 Aug 03
0
[LLVMdev] Building llvm under cygwin
Hello Anton
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:38:54 +0400 you wrote:
> I've updated it yesterday and rebuilt - llvm built fine. But when
> building llvm-gcc4 (also updated yesterday from new /trunk
> directory) it fails with the same error.
You might easily get llvm-gcc4-mingw32 binaries from "prerelease"
directory. Since stdcall, fastcall & dllimport stuff is unsupported
right now,
2006 May 02
1
[LLVMdev] Bootstrapping llvm-gcc4 on Mingw
Hello, Everyone.
I'm currently trying to bootstrap llvm-gcc4 on mingw32 platform.
Everything (except some small fixes) seems to be fine: stage1 finished
successfully. I'm linking with debug variant of LLVM, since linker bug
prevents release builds.
Unfortunately, stage2 failes immediately with this cryptic message:
$/f/tmp/llvm/gccbuild/gcc/xgcc -B/f/tmp/llvm/gccbuild/gcc/
2013 Mar 29
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Handling SRet on Windows x86
2013/3/28 Anton Korobeynikov <asl at math.spbu.ru>:
>> How can having an MSVC compatible compiler be to the detriment of clang and
>> llvm? No one is trying to break mingw here, merely add support for something
> Just to make stuff clear: I just wanted proper naming which will be
> non-confusing. Right now we have:
> - isTargetWindows() which really means