similar to: [LLVMdev] How to compile apps to bc files with the new llvm-gcc4?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] How to compile apps to bc files with the new llvm-gcc4?"

2006 Dec 10
0
[LLVMdev] How to compile apps to bc files with the new llvm-gcc4?
Unless I'm missing something, the problem lies directly with the fact that you are trying to do a link-stage operation with the GCC frontend. GCC, by default, probably runs "ld" or another system linker, which grabs the executable from binutils. This linker hasn't been modified (yet) to include support for .bc files, but you're compiler is emitting byte code to the *.o files.
2006 Dec 10
2
[LLVMdev] How to compile apps to bc files with the new llvm-gcc4?
Chandler/Domagoj, On Sun, 2006-12-10 at 10:53 -0500, Chandler Carruth wrote: > Unless I'm missing something, the problem lies directly with the fact > that you are trying to do a link-stage operation with the GCC > frontend. GCC, by default, probably runs "ld" or another system > linker, which grabs the executable from binutils. This linker hasn't > been modified
2006 Jun 07
1
Dspam Plugin
Johannes, do you have any plans (regarding your dspam plugin) to: a) Integrate it into libdspam rather than calling the dspam binary? b) Any ideas for scaling it better, and implementing it scaled better? I notice a slight discussion about scaling, and you have chosen not to pursue it. Is that because it's too hard, or just because you don't need to? Thanks Tim p.s. If I knew how to use
2007 Aug 28
1
dovecot dspam plugin using libdspam
Hi, I've found the dovecot dspam plugin and looked at the code. I forks and calls the dspam binary for every mail. I didn't like this behavior, so I've migrated it to use libdspam. The plugin still needs more love: * Use cmake instead of a Makefile * Make the spam folder configurable in the dovecot.conf * Code cleanup and more comments. Please test. Comments and patches are welcome
2007 Nov 19
2
dspam integration
Hi, I see http://johannes.sipsolutions.net/Projects/dovecot-antispam and http://blog.cynapses.org/2007/09/13/dovecot-dspam-plugin/ solutions. Second git repo is not answer, first one is cloned, but I see some drawbacks with it. Dspam backend is more native solution but libdspam using instead of dspam external binary looks like preffered way to integrate dspam. Another problem is waiting for
2007 Sep 30
4
new antispam plugin
Sparked from the discussion on the list, I've put my antispam plugin into git and split up the code into a frontend and possibly multiple backends. See http://git.sipsolutions.net/dovecot-antispam.git/ (URL functions as both gitweb and git URL) Andreas, I took your README file and adjusted it, I hope you don't mind. I didn't fork from your git tree because you'd already
2006 Apr 19
2
DSPAM Plugin Deployment (Was Re: Unoffical Survey - What MTA/Spam filtering do you use?)
On 4/19/06, Johannes Berg <johannes at sipsolutions.net> wrote: > On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 22:56 +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote: > > > libdspam instead of system("dspam...") > > That's a lot of work, how about calling to the dspam server instead? I'm about to start building a system for ~10,000 users, using dovecot, and was going to use dspam with it... Is
2007 Mar 03
1
apply ? function doesnt create object
hello, i have written a function to extract certain lines from a matrix. the result is a matrix with 6 cols, named dynamically according to the functions arguments. the problem is now, that i'm not able to return the resultmatrix for further use. the object is not being created. example from my console: getans(27,27) [...] [189,] 3969 161 27 1 0 1 [190,] 2142 87 27
2007 Mar 03
1
function doesnt return/create object
hello, i have written a function to extract certain lines from a matrix. the result is a matrix with 6 cols, named dynamically according to the functions arguments. the problem is now, that i'm not able to return the resultmatrix for further use. the object is not being created. example from my console: getans(27,27) [...] [189,] 3969 161 27 1 0 1 [190,] 2142 87 27
2008 Apr 30
2
Multilingual application on Mac OS X
I have installed wine package from http://thisismyinter.net/?p=29 on Mac OS X v10.5 Leopard. It works, except this http://www.thediction.com/ program don't accept Bulgarian input. I have successfully use it on Linux with "LANG=bg_BG.CP1251 wine Diction.exe", when that locale is installed. I don't know how to achieve this on Mac. "LANG=bg_BG.UTF8 wine Diction.exe" dos
2010 Jun 06
1
[LLVMdev] whole program bitcode and gold plugin
Hi, I found some posts on the topic of whole program bitcode and gold plugin. I put lto_codegen_write_merged_modules(cg, "/path/to/output.bc") into gold-plugin.cpp all_symbols_read_hook() and compiled one autotooled program (ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/diction/diction-1.11.tar.gz) as described in the gold plugin document, however, I still did not see the output.bc. Can anyone has
2007 Aug 29
2
[LLVMdev] constructing 'for' statement from LLVM bitcode
Seung, On 8/25/07, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > Ok. Note that LLVM can represent irreducible loops. You can handle > this through code duplication. > -Chris If you are willing to invest more effort into a more complicated analysis, in many cases you can even avoid code duplication. See this paper for details: @inproceedings{erosa94taming, author = {Ana M.
2006 Jun 16
3
Routing Error - Recognition failed for..
I followed the guide for RailsOnWindows (http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/rails/pages/RailsOnWindows) and completed all the steps without any problems. But when I try to access my page, I get: Routing Error Recognition failed for "/rails" rails is what I have in my httpd.conf: <VirtualHost *:80> ServerName rails DocumentRoot "D:/devapps/Apache
2007 Aug 30
0
[LLVMdev] constructing 'for' statement from LLVM bitcode
On 8/29/07, Domagoj Babic <babic.domagoj at gmail.com> wrote: > Seung, > > On 8/25/07, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > Ok. Note that LLVM can represent irreducible loops. You can handle > > this through code duplication. > > -Chris > > > If you are willing to invest more effort into a more complicated analysis, > in many cases you
2006 Dec 10
3
[LLVMdev] Building llvm-gcc4 on amd64
Hi all, I spent several hours today trying to compile llvm-gcc4 from svn and llvm from cvs on amd64 linux. In the case anyone else decides to try the same, this could ease your pain: 1) check out llvm, llvm-gcc 2) create llvm-obj llvm-gcc-obj export LLVM_INSTAL=<install_dir> cd llvm-obj export LLVM_OBJ=`pwd` ../llvm/configure --prefix=$LLVM_INSTALL --enable-debug-runtime 4) At one point,
2005 Dec 25
5
RJS not working?
I''ve been attempting to add a simple rjs ''delete'' method to my project. However, no matter what I try, it simply doesn''t work. Even the easy, easy stuff seems broken. (Yes, <%= javascript_include_tag :defaults %> is being included in the template.) For example, from: http://www.codyfauser.com/articles/2005/11/20/rails-rjs-templates VIEW: <h1
2006 Apr 08
2
dovecot-dspam-plugin not launching dspam
hello, i added the dovecot-dspam-plugin [1] to my dovecot-installation. when trying to move a mail out of or into the predefined spamfolder with thunderbird a messagebox shows : "dspam failed" and the message remains in its original position. i am using virtual mail users contained in a postgresql-database [2]. normal imap access and dspam training from the commandline works fine.
2006 Sep 29
2
[LLVMdev] FunctionPass requiring SCCs
On Sep 29, 2006, at 2:05 PM, Domagoj Babic wrote: > > Check out scc_* iterators. Also note that the call graph > is not aware of the indirect calls, so you will need to write your > own CG implementation if you need to handle function pointers > soundly. > Chris, is this true? If so, it seems like a bad property for the CallGraphSCCPass framework. --Vikram
2006 Nov 29
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM Conference 2007 ?
Hi all, On 11/28/06, Reid Spencer <rspencer at reidspencer.com> wrote: > * Venue: West Coast, USA. Probably either San Francisco Bay Area or > Seattle > * Time Frame: Post 2.0 release, summer 2007 > * Topics: Anything related to use or development of LLVM I'd vote for Seattle. The costs of organization should be lower than in the Bay Area. > * An indication of how
2007 Aug 30
1
[LLVMdev] constructing 'for' statement from LLVM bitcode
Daniel, On 8/30/07, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > On 8/29/07, Domagoj Babic <babic.domagoj at gmail.com> wrote: > > Seung, > > > > On 8/25/07, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > > Ok. Note that LLVM can represent irreducible loops. You can handle > > > this through code duplication. > > > -Chris >