similar to: [LLVMdev] Removing DSA from LLVM

I apologize if this has been answered previously, but why is DSA being removed from LLVM? I ask because I am currently using the latest CVS versions of LLVM and DSA. Regards, Ryan John Criswell wrote: > Dear All, > > We'd like to move the Data Structure Analysis (DSA) code from the LLVM > source tree (lib/Analysis/DataStructure) into the Pool Allocation > project. I plan

On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Ryan M. Lefever wrote: > I apologize if this has been answered previously, but why is DSA being > removed from LLVM? I ask because I am currently using the latest CVS > versions of LLVM and DSA. There are two reasons for doing this: 1. DSA is currently only used by llvm-poolalloc. 2. More seriously, DSA infringes on certain patents held by Microsoft, regarding

I updated dsa to mainline cvs. Poolalloc is broken, however. On Mar 6, 2007, at 3:39 AM, Ryan M. Lefever wrote: > What versions of llvm and llvm-poolalloc should I check out of cvs, in > order to use DSA? In a previous post John Criswell suggested checking > llvm and llvm-poolalloc out of cvs using the -r release_19 flag. > However, there were several post later that said that

What versions of llvm and llvm-poolalloc should I check out of cvs, in order to use DSA? In a previous post John Criswell suggested checking llvm and llvm-poolalloc out of cvs using the -r release_19 flag. However, there were several post later that said that changes should not be made to the release_19 branch. At any rate, I've not seen any update on which versions of llvm and

Forgot to hit "Reply All." -- John T. -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> Subject: Re: using dsa Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 09:53:43 -0600 Size: 3103 URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20070306/ef7c2f29/attachment.mht>

How do I acquire that version of DSA that you've updated to mainline cvs? Do I still check out llvm-poolalloc, or is there a way to only check out DSA? Patrick Meredith wrote: > I updated dsa to mainline cvs. Poolalloc is broken, however. > > On Mar 6, 2007, at 3:39 AM, Ryan M. Lefever wrote: > >> What versions of llvm and llvm-poolalloc should I check out of cvs, in

I have a few questions on using dsa now that it has been moved out of llvm. I have llvm -r release_19 checked out from cvs, and llvm-poolalloc -r release_19 checked out from cvs into the projects directory, as John Criswell previously suggested. 1) I have some compiler transforms that I'm writing that use DSA. They can no longer find the header files for DSA. My transforms are located

Dear All, I am trying to use DataStructure Alias Analysis. From the code at poolalloc it seems that rDSA needs to be compiled to get -ds-aa feature while the Makefile builds just the DSA. Please correct me if I am doing something wrong. Thanks, Manish -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On 10/1/11 11:01 PM, Manish Gupta wrote: > Dear All, > > I am trying to use DataStructure Alias Analysis. From the code at > poolalloc it seems that rDSA needs to be compiled to get -ds-aa > feature while the Makefile builds just the DSA. I seem to recall replying to this, but my email client says I didn't, so I'm responding again. :) The rDSA code is some experimental

Vikram S. Adve wrote: > This kind of regression is a fallout of having some code live in > separate CVS modules as "projects." It would help to have someone > volunteer to maintain each project, which can be as little as making > sure it continues to compile or as much as supporting it with answers > to questions and bug fixes. Here is the current list of projects:

This kind of regression is a fallout of having some code live in separate CVS modules as "projects." It would help to have someone volunteer to maintain each project, which can be as little as making sure it continues to compile or as much as supporting it with answers to questions and bug fixes. Here is the current list of projects: llvm-poolalloc llvm-java (currently unused

The patch below adds dsa and some of poolalloc to opt. It should be simple enough to extend to all of poolalloc by adding more classes to LinkDSA.h. Andrew Index: tools/opt/opt.cpp =================================================================== --- tools/opt/opt.cpp (revision 97995) +++ tools/opt/opt.cpp (working copy) @@ -38,6 +38,12 @@ #include "llvm/LinkAllVMCore.h"

HI guys. I'm trying to build the poolalloc on llvm-2.0 but there exist some errors. Can you tell me which version of llvm is known to make the poolalloc build and install successful? Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20070710/4ab5e155/attachment.html>

Hi LLVM dev team: I am now doing an experiment to comparing Steensgaard-style and Andersen-style pointer analysis on LLVM. Since steensgaard pointer analysis is in module "poolalloc", so I installed poolalloc release 2.6 on my machine(intel X86_64 RedHatEnterpriseLinux 5.1, gcc-4.2.4), two directories "include" and "lib" were created after installation but no

Thanks John, for the update to the Makefiles. I did an "svn update" and am now able to build all the libraries. There were some problems building the poolalloc runtime but I'm not really interested in that. Andrew, thanks for the patch. I am trying to add DSA to opt as you suggested. What should the contents of LinkDSA.h be ? I would appreciate it if you could send me a copy of

Hi, LLVM dev team: Thanks for your suggestion, I have done the experiment to compare the two pointer analysis(Andersen and Steensgaard) methods in LLVM, but the result was unexpected. In each test, I compare these two methods using same optimization; There are several tests, each with a different optimization. The benchmark is all the 11 C programs in CINT2000 of SPEC. In all the tests, I found

Ryan M. Lefever wrote: > I have a few questions on using dsa now that it has been moved out of > llvm. I have llvm -r release_19 checked out from cvs, and > llvm-poolalloc -r release_19 checked out from cvs into the projects > directory, as John Criswell previously suggested. > > 1) I have some compiler transforms that I'm writing that use DSA. They > can no longer

聪明陈 wrote: > Hi LLVM dev team: > I am now doing an experiment to comparing Steensgaard-style and > Andersen-style pointer analysis on LLVM. Since steensgaard pointer > analysis is in module "poolalloc", so I installed poolalloc release > 2.6 on my machine(intel X86_64 RedHatEnterpriseLinux 5.1, gcc-4.2.4), > two directories "include" and "lib" were

Chris, I performed the steps you gave below to check out llvm-poolalloc. When I want to get new updates made to llvm-poolalloc, do I perform the following commands? cvs -d :pserver:anon at llvm.org:/var/cvs/llvm login <Hit return for an empty password> cd llvm/projects cvs -d :pserver:anon at llvm.org:/var/cvs/llvm update -r release_19 llvm-poolalloc In other words, do I specify the

Hi, LLVM dev team: Thanks for your suggestion, I have done the experiment to compare the two pointer analysis(Andersen and Steensgaard) methods in LLVM, but the result was unexpected. In each test, I compare these two methods using same optimization; There are several tests, each with a different optimization. The benchmark is all the 11 C programs in CINT2000 of SPEC. In all the tests, I found