Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] llc doesn't work in release build"
2006 Aug 20
1
[LLVMdev] make builds Release configuration by default
Hi!
I'm installing LLVM under Debian Linux.
I've installed llvm-gcc3 binaries and am trying to build LLVM.
I run make command from llvmobjdir and it builds Release configuration. I
didn't set ENABLE_OPTIMIZED variable to 1 and I didn't configure LLVM with
--enable-optimized switch. What can cause building Release configuration and
how can I switch to Debug one?
Thanks.
Tony.
2006 Sep 02
2
[LLVMdev] Adding register allocator to LLVM
Hi all!
I didn't manage to link my regalloc to lli (I added USEDLIBS to its
makefile). Without it I can't run tests cause they need lli to be built. So
how can I link createMyRegisterAllocator function to lli?
Thanks.
On 8/22/06, Anton Vayvod <avayvod at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I managed to link my RegAlloc.a library to llc tool but can;t make the
> same with lli tool.
2006 Aug 03
3
[LLVMdev] Adding register allocator to LLVM
Hi!
I'm developing a register allocator and need it to be available as an option
for llc tool. I used to edit /lib/CodeGen/Passes.cpp for this aim but after
yesterday's update these options are defined somewhere else and I can't find
the place.
Thanks for your help.
Tony.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2010 Jul 19
2
[LLVMdev] VMkit AOT build problem: llc crushed on glibj compilation to native(.s) file
Hi,
Trying to build AOT version of vmkit java,
building for that classpath glibj.zip:
$ cd vmkit/tools/vmjc/libvmjc
$ make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1 DISABLE_ASSERTIONS=1 REQUIRES_FRAME_POINTER=1
has eventually, after 50 minutes, brought:
<<<
llvm[0]: Compiling glibj.zip to llvm
llvm[0]: Optimizing glibj.zip
llvm[0]: Compiling glibj.zip.bc to native
UNREACHABLE executed!
0 llc
2010 Aug 02
0
[LLVMdev] VMkit AOT build problem: llc crushed on glibj compilation to native(.s) file
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Minas Abrahamyan <minas.subs at gmail.com> wrote:
> Trying to build AOT version of vmkit java,
> building for that classpath glibj.zip:
>
> $ cd vmkit/tools/vmjc/libvmjc
> $ make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1 DISABLE_ASSERTIONS=1 REQUIRES_FRAME_POINTER=1
>
> has eventually, after 50 minutes, brought:
> <<<
> llvm[0]: Compiling
2009 Oct 17
3
[LLVMdev] Build errors for vmkit
Hi,
I can't seem to get VMKit to compile correctly. I'm on a 64 bit
Jaunty system. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc from the subversion source
no problem, but when I try to compile VMKit I get some issue with
GCAllocator:
/home/mmwu/Download/llvm$ ./configure
/home/mmwu/Download/llvm$ make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1
/home/mmwu/Download/llvm$ make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1 install
...
2006 Aug 04
1
[LLVMdev] Building llvm under cygwin
install configuration built successfully too. llvm-gcc version is:
gcc version 4.0.1 LLVM <Apple Computer, Inc. build 5400>
how can I test it? I need to run make check in llvm/obj dir or in
llvm-gcc/obj dir?
Thanks
On 8/4/06, Anton Vayvod <avayvod at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, I didn't install it myself.
>
> llvm-gcc4 has built successfully.
>
> Making
2009 Oct 18
0
[LLVMdev] Build errors for vmkit
Dear Michael,
The symbols that are said undefined by the compiler live in
libAllocator.a. That file should be in Release/lib/, do you have it?
It is possible that the compiler has linking order problems. What is
the version of your gcc?
You can try changing the link order of the make command by editing
tools/vmkit/Makefile.
Also, you should know that the GC of vmkit does not work on a
2010 Aug 03
2
[LLVMdev] VMkit AOT build problem: llc crushed on glibj compilation to native(.s) file
Hi Allan,
Thanks for the fix! So is this a bug in LLVM? Can you reduce that to a small
test case and file a bug?
Nicolas
2010/8/2 Allan Tong <actong88 at gmail.com>
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Minas Abrahamyan <minas.subs at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Trying to build AOT version of vmkit java,
> > building for that classpath glibj.zip:
> >
> > $ cd
2010 Nov 07
2
[LLVMdev] Compiling front end for ARM target
I am trying to compile llvm-gcc for an ARm target. I usine the following
configure options:
/home/tony/llvm/llvm-gcc/configure
--prefix=/home/tony/llvm/llvm-gcc-install/ --program-prefix=llvm-arm-
--enable-llvm=/home/tony/llvm/llvm-install/ --enable-pic --disable-bootstrap
--target=arm-none-linux-gnueabi --enable-languages=c,c++
Then I try to make:
make ENABLE_PROFILING=1 ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1
2010 Aug 08
1
[LLVMdev] What is the gcc optimization flag for "ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1" in LLVM?
Dear LLVM developers,
I am wondering the gcc optimization flag for "ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1" in
LLVM is -O2 or -O3.
And what is the flag if I set "ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=0"?
If I want to manually modify the flag for "ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1" in LLVM,
what file should I refer to?
--
Regards,
Heming Cui
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was
2007 May 15
8
[LLVMdev] 2.0 Pre-release tarballs online
I've uploaded the 2.0 pre-release to this location:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.0/
If you have free time and would like to help test this release, please
download the appropriate tarballs from the website.
Here are a few ways you can help test this release:
1) Download llvm-gcc4 binary and llvm. Compile and run make check.
2) Download llvm-gcc4 binary, llvm, and llvm-test. Compile, run
2007 May 17
0
[LLVMdev] 2.0 Pre-release tarballs online
Tanya,
I have done make check and nightly report tests on LLVM on the GCC 4.2.0
release, on Linux x86 32 bit.
On make check the bit intrinsics test is still failing but it works from the
command line, strange ?
What files do you want from the nightly report, as I am not familiar with it
?
I will be doing Cygwin tests next.
Aaron
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tanya M.
2007 May 18
0
[LLVMdev] Updated: 2.0 Pre-release tarballs online
I've updated the pre-release tarballs online. I'm also extending the
testing completion date to May 22nd at 5pm PDT. The new release target
date is May 23rd.
If you have any free time, please give the new pre-release a try.
Thanks to all who have tested LLVM!
-Tanya
P.S. Documentation review should still be completed today! Thanks!
> I've uploaded the 2.0 pre-release to this
2012 Mar 14
1
[LLVMdev] ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1
When building without ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1, is that supposed to take 10
times longer to "build" LLVM than with ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1?
Thanks.
Reed
2007 May 18
2
[LLVMdev] 2.0 Pre-release tarballs online
> On make check the bit intrinsics test is still failing but it works from the
> command line, strange ?
Did Chris help you with this or is it still an issue?
> What files do you want from the nightly report, as I am not familiar with it
> ?
in llvm-test, if you run the gmake TEST=nightly report command it will
generated a report.nightly.txt file. Thats what I want to see.
Thanks!
2009 Apr 25
1
[LLVMdev] Release build failure (FinalLibDeps.txt: No such file or directory)
$ make update
...snip...
Updated to revision 69967.
$ ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1 make
...snip...
llvm[1]: Regenerating LibDeps.txt.tmp
llvm[1]: Checking for cyclic dependencies between LLVM libraries.
find-cycles.pl: Circular dependency between *.a files:
find-cycles.pl: libLLVMAsmPrinter.a libLLVMCodeGen.a
libLLVMSelectionDAG.a
llvm[1]: Building llvm-config script.
cat:
2007 May 17
1
[LLVMdev] 2.0 Pre-release tarballs online
Aaron,
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 22:54 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote:
> Tanya,
>
> I have done make check and nightly report tests on LLVM on the GCC 4.2.0
> release, on Linux x86 32 bit.
>
> On make check the bit intrinsics test is still failing but it works from the
> command line, strange ?
Can you be a bit more specific about which test is failing?
Reid.
>
> What
2006 Mar 27
3
[LLVMdev] PR723: Default To Optimized Build
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, John Criswell wrote:
> One consideration to weigh is that a debug build of LLVM provides users with
> more diagnostic information to submit with bug reports (since many bugs are
> caught by assertions, which print a readable stack trace). The tradeoff
> seems to be faster and smaller LLVM tools (optimized build) vs. better
> diagnostic information for bug
2009 Aug 29
2
[LLVMdev] Build problems with MinGW
Grabbed the latest bits from SVN (, tried to build with MinGW. I get a
cc1plus.exe out of memory error while trying to "make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1" on
the X86CodeEmitter. I can get a full stack trace if necessary, but has
anybody else run into this problem? Only seems to happen with the Release
build-I got a full Debug build to work fine.
Ted Neward
Java, .NET, XML Services