similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM Conference 2007 ?

Hi all, On 11/28/06, Reid Spencer <rspencer at reidspencer.com> wrote: > * Venue: West Coast, USA. Probably either San Francisco Bay Area or > Seattle > * Time Frame: Post 2.0 release, summer 2007 > * Topics: Anything related to use or development of LLVM I'd vote for Seattle. The costs of organization should be lower than in the Bay Area. > * An indication of how

> * An indication of how likely you would be to attend (0=no, 5=maybe, > 10=have my ticket) > * Preferred location It makes more sense to have it in the Bay Area since most of the LLVM developers are there (ie. all of Apple employees). San Fran is also a major airport for international people. > * What you could offer (present a paper or topic, run a workshop, teach > a tutorial,

Dear LLVM user, We are proud to announce the second European LLVM event on April 12-13 2012 in London, UK, starting at noon on April 12th . This will be a full one-day conference with the intention and aim of exposing new developments and supporting and strengthening the network of LLVM developers around Europe. The format will resemble that of the previous meeting held in London in September

Apologies for cross posting.... --------------------------------------------------------------------- CART Data Mining'04: First International CART(R) Conferences Focusing on the Data Mining technology of Leo Breiman, Jerome Friedman, Richard Olshen, Charles Stone (CART, MARS(R), TreeNet(tm), PRIM(tm)...) First Call For submissions

Le 11 janv. 2012 à 13:00, James Molloy a écrit : > Dear LLVM user, > > We are proud to announce the second European LLVM event on April 12-13 2012 in London, UK, starting at noon on April 12th . > > This will be a full one-day conference with the intention and aim of exposing new developments and supporting and strengthening the network of LLVM developers around Europe. The

Hello, I have the pleasure to announce that the X.org Developer Conference 2018 will be held in A Coruña, Spain from September 26th to September 28th. The venue is located at the Computer Science faculty of the University of Coruña. This year, we have created a new website for the event: https://xdc2018.x.org And a Twitter account for announcing updates, please follow us!

Hi All, It's my pleasure to announce the Diversity and Inclusion in Compilers and Tools workshop that will be held on the afternoon of April 5th, at the same venue as the EuroLLVM'20. This event features speakers and discussion aiming to increase diversity and inclusion within the LLVM community, attendee's workplace or university, and within the field of compilers and tools. It is

Dear LLVMers, This email is intended for those interested in path-sensitive analysis, integer overflow analysis, static analysis, and (perhaps) loop invariant computation. Traditionally, such analyses have been considered too expensive to be practical, and were mostly an academic curiosity. The core of the problem is the lack of adequate automated decision procedures which could quickly

Seung, On 8/25/07, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > Ok. Note that LLVM can represent irreducible loops. You can handle > this through code duplication. > -Chris If you are willing to invest more effort into a more complicated analysis, in many cases you can even avoid code duplication. See this paper for details: @inproceedings{erosa94taming, author = {Ana M.

We are pleased to announce the 6th European LLVM conference on March 17-18, 2016 in Barcelona, Spain. This will be a full two-day conference which aims to present the latest developments around LLVM and help strengthen the network of LLVM developers and users. The format will be similar to that of the previous meetings, with ample time for presentations, discussion, and networking between

On 8/29/07, Domagoj Babic <babic.domagoj at gmail.com> wrote: > Seung, > > On 8/25/07, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > Ok. Note that LLVM can represent irreducible loops. You can handle > > this through code duplication. > > -Chris > > > If you are willing to invest more effort into a more complicated analysis, > in many cases you

Hi all, I spent several hours today trying to compile llvm-gcc4 from svn and llvm from cvs on amd64 linux. In the case anyone else decides to try the same, this could ease your pain: 1) check out llvm, llvm-gcc 2) create llvm-obj llvm-gcc-obj export LLVM_INSTAL=<install_dir> cd llvm-obj export LLVM_OBJ=`pwd` ../llvm/configure --prefix=$LLVM_INSTALL --enable-debug-runtime 4) At one point,

Daniel, On 8/30/07, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > On 8/29/07, Domagoj Babic <babic.domagoj at gmail.com> wrote: > > Seung, > > > > On 8/25/07, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > > Ok. Note that LLVM can represent irreducible loops. You can handle > > > this through code duplication. > > > -Chris >

On Sep 29, 2006, at 2:05 PM, Domagoj Babic wrote: > > Check out scc_* iterators. Also note that the call graph > is not aware of the indirect calls, so you will need to write your > own CG implementation if you need to handle function pointers > soundly. > Chris, is this true? If so, it seems like a bad property for the CallGraphSCCPass framework. --Vikram

On 11/20/2011 4:33 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > One idea for a hacking session would be a "performance analysis > workshop". People could bring their apps, we could sample them track > down what part of the compiler would need to change and code it up (if > time allowed). > > Given the trade offs involved, it could be helpful to many folks, the > trick is to get

On Oct 2, 2007, at 1:03 AM, Domagoj Babic wrote: > Hi all, > > I have the same problem. My guess is that when a structure > is passed as a parameter, you cast it into an array for optimization > reasons (less parameters, less stack space). This is not an optimization. This behavior is to be ABI complaint when emitting code for your OS. That said, this is not a very good way to

Hi, I'm trying to compile some apps with the new llvm-gcc4 on amd64 linux to .bc files, rather than to the native code. The same process I used to build those apps before with llvm-gcc3 doesn't work: 1) export CC=llvm-gcc CXX=llvm-g++ CFLAGS="-g -fno-inline" CXXFLAGS="-g -fno-inline" 2) cd <whatever-app>; ./configure 3) make CFLAGS+=-emit-llvm

Your are invited to attend the 2016 LLVM Developers’ Meeting <http://llvm.org/devmtg/2016-11/> on November 3-4 in San Jose, CA. Registration will open today, July 1, at 5:00PM PDT. You may register here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/2016-llvm-developers-meeting-bay-area-tickets-26043992282 <https://www.eventbrite.com/e/2016-llvm-developers-meeting-bay-area-tickets-26043992282>

Hi, Here's something I don't understand... How come that UNDEF can appear as a branch condition at all? I just can't think of any ways. If you write something like fun() { int x; if (x > 100) { ... } else { ... } } LLVM generates a boolean temporary that compares (uninitialized) value of x with 100. Second, if it already can appear, isn't that a bug that

> On Jul 5, 2016, at 2:29 PM, Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > > I'm curious about the requirement to provide birth date—what's that about? Liability reasons because we serve alcohol at the reception. I can change to age if thats better or ask if someone is under 21 but you may still be asked show ID if a server is unsure. -Tanya > Thanks, >