Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1100 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] f95 problem with SPEC2K"
2006 Nov 25
0
[LLVMdev] f95 problem with SPEC2K
On 25 Nov 2006, at 09:02, Reid Spencer wrote:
> Anyone know what to do about this:
>
> make[4]: Leaving directory `/proj/llvm/llvm-test-1/External/SPEC/
> CFP2000/173.applu'
> make[4]: Entering directory `/proj/llvm/llvm-test-1/External/SPEC/
> CFP2000/178.galgel'
> /usr/bin/f95 -w -S -O2 /opt/spec/CPU2000v1.3.1/benchspec//
> CFP2000/178.galgel/src/modules.f90
2006 Sep 01
2
[LLVMdev] compiling the full SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode
On 31 Aug 2006, at 23:46, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote:
>> Bummer. I think I'll contact the NAG support for more info on
>> this. Can you
>> show me the content of your Makefile.nagfortran?
>
> It is identical to yours.
>
>> Also, it is possible to tell make only to compile benchmark X? How
>> can I
>>
2006 Sep 01
0
[LLVMdev] compiling the full SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode
On 01 Sep 2006, at 10:05, Kenneth Hoste wrote:
>
>>
>>> Also, it is possible to tell make only to compile benchmark X? How
>>> can I
>>> enforce this?
>>
>> Go into the directory for that benchmark, then run 'make' or
>> whatever.
>
I tried tom compile each of the SPEC CPU2000 benchmarks using the
make command is each respective
2006 Sep 01
2
[LLVMdev] compiling the full SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode
Hello,
Some problems were solved, new ones arised... Getting closer though...
The fixes for the previous problems are at the bottom of this email,
bug reports will be submitted when all problems are solved.
+++ New/remaining problems +++
Currently, 9/26 benchmarks compile and run succesfully. One (fma3d)
still has a f95 related problem (see below).
The other 16 are divided into two groups:
2006 Aug 31
2
[LLVMdev] compiling the full SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode
On 31 Aug 2006, at 19:13, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote:
>
>> When I adjust the settings in Makefile.nagfortran as follows, I'm
>> able to get bytecode file for lucas, galgel and facerec, but make
>> still quits with an error (after generating
>> bytecode files for 7 (out of 26) benchmarks.
>>
>> Also, the file
2006 Aug 30
2
[LLVMdev] compiling the full SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode
Hi Chris,
>
> I use NAG with llvm-gcc4. What sort of errors do you get? Did you
> configure llvm-test with the appropriate flags to find it?
>
Yes, I did. llvm-test is configured as follows: (in /work/LLVM/1.8/
llvm/project/llvm-test):
./configure --with-spec2000=/work/SPEC_CPU2000_1.3_src/benchspec --
without-f2c --with-f95-bin=/work/NAG_f95/bin --with-f95-lib=/work/
2006 Aug 31
2
[LLVMdev] compiling the full SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode
On 30 Aug 2006, at 23:04, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote:
>>> I use NAG with llvm-gcc4. What sort of errors do you get? Did
>>> you configure llvm-test with the appropriate flags to find it?
>> Yes, I did. llvm-test is configured as follows: (in /work/LLVM/
>> 1.8/ llvm/project/llvm-test):
>> ./configure
2006 Aug 31
2
[LLVMdev] compiling the full SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode
On 31 Aug 2006, at 07:58, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote:
>>> $ grep F95 .../projects/llvm-test/Makefile.config
>>
>> -bash-3.00$ grep F95 projects/llvm-test/Makefile.config
>> # F95: Enable LLVM to run Fortran benchmarks without a Fortran
>> front-end
>> USE_F95=1
>> F95_DIR :=
>> F95 :=
2006 Nov 25
1
[LLVMdev] f95 problem with SPEC2K
Hi Kenneth,
On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 10:12 +0100, Kenneth Hoste wrote:
> >
> > ?
> >
> > This man page:
> > http://www.die.net/doc/linux/man/man1/gfortran.1.html
> >
> > says there's no such option as -kind
> >
> > Do I need some special version of f95 to run the SPEC2K tests?
>
> If I'm correct, f95 has nothing to do with GCC.
As
2006 Aug 31
0
[LLVMdev] compiling the full SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote:
> Bummer. I think I'll contact the NAG support for more info on this. Can you
> show me the content of your Makefile.nagfortran?
It is identical to yours.
> Also, it is possible to tell make only to compile benchmark X? How can I
> enforce this?
Go into the directory for that benchmark, then run 'make' or whatever.
-Chris
--
2006 Aug 30
0
[LLVMdev] compiling the full SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote:
> I've been trying (on and off) to compile the _full_ SPEC CPU2000 benchmark
> suite to LLVM bytecode. The biggest problem
> I'm facing is the Fortran benchmarks, for which some partial support is
> already available it seems (using f2c).
ok.
> Unfortunately the f2c compiler only allows the translation of Fortran-77
>
2006 Aug 30
2
[LLVMdev] compiling the full SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode
Hello LLVM-people,
I've been trying (on and off) to compile the _full_ SPEC CPU2000
benchmark suite to LLVM bytecode. The biggest problem
I'm facing is the Fortran benchmarks, for which some partial support
is already available it seems (using f2c).
Unfortunately the f2c compiler only allows the translation of
Fortran-77 programs to C code (which is then compiled using llvm-gcc).
2006 Aug 30
0
[LLVMdev] compiling the full SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote:
>> I use NAG with llvm-gcc4. What sort of errors do you get? Did you
>> configure llvm-test with the appropriate flags to find it?
> Yes, I did. llvm-test is configured as follows: (in /work/LLVM/1.8/
> llvm/project/llvm-test):
> ./configure --with-spec2000=/work/SPEC_CPU2000_1.3_src/benchspec --
> without-f2c
2006 Sep 01
0
[LLVMdev] compiling the full SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote:
> Some problems were solved, new ones arised... Getting closer though...
> The fixes for the previous problems are at the bottom of this email,
> bug reports will be submitted when all problems are solved.
Kenneth,
In general, I am more than happy to help people on this list. It is good
for the community and I enjoy helping people be successful
2006 Aug 31
0
[LLVMdev] compiling the full SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote:
>> $ grep F95 .../projects/llvm-test/Makefile.config
>
> -bash-3.00$ grep F95 projects/llvm-test/Makefile.config
> # F95: Enable LLVM to run Fortran benchmarks without a Fortran front-end
> USE_F95=1
> F95_DIR :=
> F95 := /work/NAG_f95/bin/f95
> F95_INC := /work/NAG_f95/lib
> F95_LIB := /work/NAG_f95/lib
>
> Looks
2006 Aug 31
0
[LLVMdev] compiling the full SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote:
>> It doesn't to me. If you set F95_DIR to /work/NAG_f95 things will
>> probably work much better for you.
>
> No, that doesn't seem to be the problem. If I provide the additional
> --with-f95 option with the correct directory to configure,
> I still get the same errors (although it mentions /work/NAG_f95/lib/
>
2012 Jun 05
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] add x32 psABI support
If you are interesting to play around X32, you may refer to http://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/x32 to bootstrap a local environment on Linux.
Yours
- Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: cfe-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:cfe-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Liao, Michael
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 5:09 PM
To: llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu; cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
2006 Aug 09
2
[LLVMdev] compiling SPEC suite using f95
Hello,
I'm trying to compile to SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode, using
the llvm-test harness.
I have tried this using:
- both the 1.7 and 1.8 releases, without succes (and running into
the same problems in both releases)
- both the gcc3 and gcc4 frontends
I'm working on Linux/x86.
LLVM is configured using:
./configure --prefix=/path/to/bin/dir
and compiled using
gmake; gmake
2008 Oct 31
3
[LLVMdev] gfortran link failure in current llvm svn
On Oct 30, 2008, at 11:02 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Oct 30, 2008, at 5:23 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> ps We do have one oddity left in llvm-gfortran from current llvm
>> svn. I find everytime I compile something with llvm-gfortran that
>> I get a series of warning messages...
>>
>> f951: warning: command line option "-Wformat" is valid for C/C++/
2008 Oct 31
0
[LLVMdev] gfortran link failure in current llvm svn
On Oct 30, 2008, at 5:23 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> ps We do have one oddity left in llvm-gfortran from current llvm
> svn. I find everytime I compile something with llvm-gfortran that
> I get a series of warning messages...
>
> f951: warning: command line option "-Wformat" is valid for C/C++/
> ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran
> f951: warning: command line option