similar to: [LLVMdev] Disable Compression option for gccld

hi, I'm really new to llvm. I've successfully bootstrapped llvm-14 on my system and am able to successfully compile c code to llvm. the problem is now that gccld is complaining that it can't find the libraries, like "c" or "crtend". [1] all is fine, if I just use intrinsified functions like printf and friends, but I want to use the clock_gettime function and

gccld passes -shared through if it's generating a shared library, but if you're compiling a program that needs to have its symbols externally accessible, it doesn't pass -export-dynamic through to gcc for the final link. The attached patch fixes this. I've tested with a small test case I sent Chris, and with Python; both seem to work. I also fixed some inaccurate comments in

Hi all, > Please try it out, if it doesn't work, please tell us what's > wrong, or, better yet, submit a patch. :) Alright, here are the results of building the latest llvm from CVS under cygwin: lib\Debugger\SourceFile.cpp needs #include <assert.h> when building with gcc 3.3.3 tools\gccld\gccld.cpp line 128 tools\llvm-ld\llvm-ld line 318 need

Misha Brukman wrote: > Hey, Jakob -- > > On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 05:55:07PM +0100, Jakob Praher wrote: > >>I'm really new to llvm. I've successfully bootstrapped llvm-14 on my >>system and am able to successfully compile c code to llvm. >> >>the problem is now that gccld is complaining that it can't find the >>libraries, like "c" or

gccld: Cannot find linker input file 'crtend.o I have set the LLVM_LIB_SEARCH_PATH ls -l $LLVM_LIB_SEARCH_PATH total 104 -rw-r--r-- 1 muj20 muj20 12788 Dec 7 17:05 crtend.o -rw-r--r-- 1 muj20 muj20 1984 Dec 7 17:05 libc.bc -rw-r--r-- 1 muj20 muj20 120 Dec 7 17:05 libcurses.bc

Ok, I am trying to configure llvm to compile benchmarks as suggested by John, and after running configure, I get the following error while running make in the /test/Programs/External/SPEC ---- make[1]: Entering directory `/home/llvm/llvm/test/Programs/External/SPEC/CINT95' make[2]: Entering directory `/home/llvm/llvm/test/Programs/External/SPEC/CINT95/099.go'

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Jakob Praher wrote: > >> thanks for the pointer. Yes I've done that, but in the new shell >> session I apparently forgot to set the LLVM_LIB_SEARCH_PATH. >> >> now gccld isn't complaining anymore but the interpreter doesn't seem >> to like it still: > > > It looks like the jit doesn't find

Vinay S. Belgaumkar wrote: > Ok, I am trying to configure llvm to compile benchmarks as suggested by > John, and after running configure, I get the following error while > running make in the /test/Programs/External/SPEC Hmmm. It sounds like the Makefiles are not creating the gccld command line correctly. Some questions: 1) Can you send us your Makefile.config? 2) Can you tell us

Hi, I'm able to build the llvm tools on the MinGW platform: burg, fpcmp, tblgen, llvm-as, llvm-dis, opt, gccas, llc, llvm-link, lli, gccld, llvm-stub, analyze and extract. I wonder if these tools are sufficient to start build the cfrontend? Henrik. _________________________________________________________________ Undg� pop-ups med MSN Toolbar - http://toolbar.msn.dk hent den gratis!

Dear All, I was wondering if there is a standard way of specifying a list of functions that *should not* be inlined by the -inline pass. I'm currently working with an experimental analysis pass that checks for calls to memory allocation functions; inlining and dead code elimination might make the pass more stable, but we don't want to inline the calls to the memory allocation

ymxia at nudt.edu.cn wrote: > Hi, > > I want to check some properties of linux kernel with llvm, but I don't know how to compile a > > linux kernel to an llvm's .bc file. I have let llvm's gcc front-end ignore inline assembly by > > modifying cfrontend/src/gcc/llvm-expand.c, and replace CC/as/ar in the Makefile of the kernel > > with

On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, John Criswell wrote: > I was wondering if there is a standard way of specifying a list of functions > that *should not* be inlined by the -inline pass. Nope, but you could hack something into gccas/gccld if you want. Of course, you can disable inlining completely with the -disable-inlining flag. > I'm currently working with an experimental analysis pass that

This didn't work as I tried with 197.parser. it works without "-Wl,-disable-opt" switch though. [197.parser]$ llvm-gcc analyze-linkage.c and.c build-disjuncts.c extract-links.c fast-match.c idiom.c main.c massage.c parse.c post-process.c print.c prune.c read-dict.c utilities.c xalloc.c word-file.c strncasecmp.c -Wa,-disable-opt -Wl,-disable-opt -lm -o llvm_parser [197.parser]$

On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 05:13:15PM -0500, Nicholas Riley wrote: > The attached patch fixes this. ...but had tabs in it. Misha kindly reminded me off-list that this was bad. Try this one instead. -- Nicholas Riley <njriley at uiuc.edu> | <http://www.uiuc.edu/ph/www/njriley> -------------- next part -------------- Index: tools/gccld/GenerateCode.cpp

Hi Reid, > I've been doing a Cygwin build today too. All these problems > have been updated in the current CVS. Please update your tree > and give it another try. Alright, this time everything works quite a bit better. However: tools\llvm-ld\llvm-ld.cpp needs the CopyFile() invocation fix identical to gccld.cpp Also, it turns out gcc 3.3.3 in cygwin is buggy and it's unable

Hey, Jakob -- On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 05:55:07PM +0100, Jakob Praher wrote: > I'm really new to llvm. I've successfully bootstrapped llvm-14 on my > system and am able to successfully compile c code to llvm. > > the problem is now that gccld is complaining that it can't find the > libraries, like "c" or "crtend". [1] Did you install the bytecode

On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Jakob Praher wrote: > thanks for the pointer. Yes I've done that, but in the new shell session I > apparently forgot to set the LLVM_LIB_SEARCH_PATH. > > now gccld isn't complaining anymore but the interpreter doesn't seem to like > it still: It looks like the jit doesn't find these because they are located in librt. Try this (or adapt to

Hi all LLVMor, I just tried to compile a simple code and analyze the number of the basic blocks. But after compile, what I got, the bytecode is seems to be optimized bytecode. So the information of basic blocks is not what I expected. I want ot use the code as example to see how some of code optimization methods work. However, after compiling file using llvm test.c -o test, bytecode file

On Sat, 1 May 2004, [koi8-r] "Valery A.Khamenya[koi8-r] " wrote: > there are two issues concerning invoking optimizations: > > 1. > this document: > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/GettingStarted.html > is very nice, it would be good though to add in a section > > An Example Using the LLVM Tool Chain > > examples on optimization step. That's an

Hi all, Is anyone else seeing tests in the Multisource/Applications directory failing with something looking like this: /Users/wendling/llvm/llvm.obj/Debug/bin/gccld -L/Users/wendling/llvm/ llvm-gcc4.install/lib/gcc/powerpc-apple-darwin8.8.0/3.4-llvm -L/ Users/wendling/llvm/llvm-gcc4.install/lib Output/siod.linked.bc -lc -lpthread -lltdl -lm -o Output/siod.llvm gccld: warning: Cannot