Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] (no subject)"
2006 Nov 21
2
[LLVMdev] libstdc++ as bytecode, and compiling C++ to C
Emil:
I'm using LLVM 1.9 now. When I tried to do what you did I got the
following though:
$ llvm-g++ -emit-llvm -c x.cpp
$ llvm-link -o=linked.o x.o std/*.o sup/*.o
WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples!
WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples!
WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples!
...
$ lli linked.o
lli((anonymous
2006 Nov 21
0
[LLVMdev] libstdc++ as bytecode, and compiling C++ to C
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 05:33:32PM +0800, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah wrote:
> Emil:
>
> I'm using LLVM 1.9 now. When I tried to do what you did I got the
> following though:
>
> $ llvm-g++ -emit-llvm -c x.cpp
> $ llvm-link -o=linked.o x.o std/*.o sup/*.o
> WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples!
> WARNING: Linking two modules of different target
2007 May 09
2
[LLVMdev] C back-end differences
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 11:58 -0700, Bill wrote:
> On 5/8/07, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah <napi at axiomsol.com> wrote:
> > How does the C back-end of LLVM differ from the one in gcc2c developed
> > by SUN several years ago?
> >
> Hi Napi,
>
> For one, it converts LLVM's bytecode to C instead of GCC's RTL. It's
> also under a different license.
Hi
2007 May 12
2
[LLVMdev] C back-end differences
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 22:45 -0700, Bill Wendling wrote:
> On May 8, 2007, at 10:05 PM, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 11:58 -0700, Bill wrote:
> >> On 5/8/07, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah <napi at axiomsol.com> wrote:
> >>> How does the C back-end of LLVM differ from the one in gcc2c
> >>> developed
> >>> by SUN
2007 May 09
0
[LLVMdev] C back-end differences
On May 8, 2007, at 10:05 PM, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 11:58 -0700, Bill wrote:
>> On 5/8/07, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah <napi at axiomsol.com> wrote:
>>> How does the C back-end of LLVM differ from the one in gcc2c
>>> developed
>>> by SUN several years ago?
>>>
>> Hi Napi,
>>
>> For one, it converts
2006 Nov 20
0
[LLVMdev] libstdc++ as bytecode, and compiling C++ to C
On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 17:49 +1100, Emil Mikulic wrote:
> I've compiled all the object files that make up libstdc++ and libsupc++
> into LLVM bytecode:
> http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/libstdcxx.tar.bz2 (438KB)
>
> A simple test program, x.cpp:
>
> #include <iostream>
> int main() { std::cout << "hello world\n"; return 0; }
>
> $
2007 Oct 02
2
[LLVMdev] Problem building LLVM-GCC 4.0 Front End
I've read and followed the README.LLVM file that comes with LLVM-GCC 4.0
Front End source, but got the following error when compiling:
configure: error: You must specify valid path to your LLVM tree with
--enable-llvm=DIR
make: *** [configure-gcc] Error 1
I've done the following in csh before hand:
$ setenv LLVMOBJDIR /home/napi/proj/c2jvm/llvm/llvm-gcc/obj
Where did I go wrong?
2007 May 12
5
[LLVMdev] C back-end differences
On Fri, 11 May 2007, me22 wrote:
> I'm not exactly sure how llvm-g++ works. I think it goes through the
> standard gcc sequence (gimple, rtl, and such) but then outputs LLVM
> (http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html), which is the intermediate
> representation used by the rest of the chain. To make an LLVM backend
> you would not need to deal with RTL and such at all.
llvm-g++
2007 May 08
1
[LLVMdev] C back-end differences
How does the C back-end of LLVM differ from the one in gcc2c developed
by SUN several years ago?
Thanks.
Napi
2007 May 08
0
[LLVMdev] C back-end differences
On 5/8/07, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah <napi at axiomsol.com> wrote:
> How does the C back-end of LLVM differ from the one in gcc2c developed
> by SUN several years ago?
>
Hi Napi,
For one, it converts LLVM's bytecode to C instead of GCC's RTL. It's
also under a different license.
As far as code quality, I don't believe it's been compared.
-bw
2007 May 12
0
[LLVMdev] C back-end differences
On 11/05/07, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah <napi at axiomsol.com> wrote:
> I've been looking for a C++ to C translator for quite some time.
> The purpose is to support C++ for the compiler I developed targeting the
> JVM. But the compiler I wrote only supports ANSI C (1989). So the C++
> to C translator is needed, and among the options are as follows:
> [...]
> c) LLVM
2007 May 12
2
[LLVMdev] C back-end differences
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 23:15 -0400, me22 wrote:
> On 11/05/07, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah <napi at axiomsol.com> wrote:
> > I've been looking for a C++ to C translator for quite some time.
> > The purpose is to support C++ for the compiler I developed targeting the
> > JVM. But the compiler I wrote only supports ANSI C (1989). So the C++
> > to C translator is
2007 Sep 28
1
[LLVMdev] libstdc++ in LLVM bitcode
Need to know if anyone has compiled the libstdc++ to LLVM bitcode. If
it's available please where could I download it from?
Thanks.
Napi
2007 Sep 28
0
[LLVMdev] libstdc++ in LLVM bitcode
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 10:08:31AM +0800, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah wrote:
> Need to know if anyone has compiled the libstdc++ to LLVM bitcode. If
> it's available please where could I download it from?
I did this last year.
Check out:
http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/dietstdcxx.1.tar.bz2
--Emil
2007 Oct 02
0
[LLVMdev] Problem building LLVM-GCC 4.0 Front End
On 10/2/07, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah <napi at axiomsol.com> wrote:
> I've read and followed the README.LLVM file that comes with LLVM-GCC 4.0
> Front End source, but got the following error when compiling:
>
> configure: error: You must specify valid path to your LLVM tree with
> --enable-llvm=DIR
> make: *** [configure-gcc] Error 1
>
> I've done the following
2007 Oct 02
1
[LLVMdev] Problem building LLVM-GCC 4.0 Front End
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 11:47 -0700, Bill Wendling wrote:
> On 10/2/07, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah <napi at axiomsol.com> wrote:
> > I've read and followed the README.LLVM file that comes with LLVM-GCC 4.0
> > Front End source, but got the following error when compiling:
> >
> > configure: error: You must specify valid path to your LLVM tree with
> >
2006 Nov 20
2
[LLVMdev] C++ to C
Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 11:43 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 17 Nov 2006, John Criswell wrote:
>>
>>> I don't think you will need to deal with any names. The C++ standard
>>> library has already been compiled to LLVM bytecode (it is part of the
>>> llvm-gcc/llvm-g++ distribution). If you use
2006 Nov 20
4
[LLVMdev] libstdc++ as bytecode, and compiling C++ to C
I've compiled all the object files that make up libstdc++ and libsupc++
into LLVM bytecode:
http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/libstdcxx.tar.bz2 (438KB)
A simple test program, x.cpp:
#include <iostream>
int main() { std::cout << "hello world\n"; return 0; }
$ llvm-g++ -emit-llvm -c x.cpp
$ llvmc -o=out x.o std/*.o sup/*.o
$ lli out.bc
Segmentation fault (core
2006 Nov 05
4
[LLVMdev] Convert C++ to C. What is 0x0p+0 ?
Hi:
I'm interested in using llvm to convert C++ code to C code.
I used the following command to do this:
% llvm-g++ -c foo.cpp -o - | llc -march=c -o foo.cbe.c
In the resulting file foo.cbe.c there are many occurences of '0x0p+0'.
What is it used for? Here's a code snippet from the file foo.cbe.c
if ((ltmp_126_2 > 0x0p+0)) {
goto ltmp_363_19;
} else {
goto
2006 Nov 17
4
[LLVMdev] C++ to C
After converting a piece of C++ code to C one of the functions that are
generated is this:
_ZStlsISt11char_traitsIcEERSt13basic_ostreamIcT_ES5_PKc
Where is it defined and where can I find the source for it? I need the
source to compile it with a C compiler (AMPC) that will convert the C
code to Java Bytecode. If the above function is in C++ then I need to
convert it to C first.
Here's the