Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Question about bytecodes and GetElementPtr"
2006 Nov 16
0
[LLVMdev] Question about functions/bytecodes: external linkage
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
So I'm going through this super-easy example of a bytecode file along
the lines of "Hello World!"
2006 Oct 25
2
[LLVMdev] Some basic questions about LLVM version 1.8 bytecode format
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
I generated LLVM bytecode for a "hello world!" program just to get the
basic bytecode structure. I have
2004 Aug 17
2
[LLVMdev] Re: Bytecodes & docs
Reid,
Thanks for the detailed feedback.
A value of zero now means zero literal for everything except labels,
right? There is kind of a vague reference to this in the 1.0 -> 1.1
section I believe. You might want to make this clearer when talking about
values in the body of the document.
--> A comment on this: if a value of zero were never used for labels, that
would make me happy,
2004 Feb 19
1
Process R segmentation with strsplit() (PR#6601)
Getting a crash with R1.8.1 on windows 2000 an linux with the strsplit.
Version:
platform = i386-pc-mingw32
arch = i386
os = mingw32
system = i386, mingw32
status =
major = 1
minor = 8.1
year = 2003
month = 11
day = 21
language = R
Version:
platform = i386-pc-mingw32
arch = i386
os = mingw32
system = i386, mingw32
status =
major = 1
minor = 8.1
year = 2003
month = 11
day =
2006 Nov 06
0
[LLVMdev] Problems building cfrontend 4 source on SUSE 10.1
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=us-ascii" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<b>Reid,<br>
<br>
I followed the steps but got stuck as described
2013 Nov 12
0
InfiniBand Passthrough not working
2004 Aug 16
2
[LLVMdev] Bytecode file bugs / doc bugs
Dear Reid and Chris,
I thought I should send this to the list in case anyone else is struggling
to interpret bytecode files with the new docs.
(1) First a bug I already mentioned to Reid. Unlike the other new
module headers module 0x01 still uses the old 32-bit and 32-bit format
instead of the new 5-bit and 27-bit format. Thus the first module in the
file will be 0x00000001 followed by
2003 Aug 26
1
[LLVMdev] Question: Bytecode Representation of Type Definitions Table
Distinguished LLVM Creators,
I've been looking through the bytecode representation of the type
definition table and had a few questions about it. There's an enum in
Types.h that defines all bytecodes that represent the primitive types and a
few other necessary things:
0 = 0x00 = Void
1 = 0x01 = Bool
2 = 0x02 = UByte
3 = 0x03 = SByte
4 = 0x04 = UShort (16 bits)
5 = 0x05 =
2006 Nov 06
0
[LLVMdev] Problems building cfrontend 4 source on SUSE 10.1
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Reid,<br>
<br>
Here's the backtrace you asked for:<br>
<br>
2020 Apr 02
3
RFC: dynamic_cast optimization in LTO
<font face="Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif" size="2"> <span><div>Hi,<br>There was a mention of optimizing away C++ dynamic_casts in LTO in this presentation: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fd3afoM3UOE&t=1306" target="_blank">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fd3afoM3UOE&t=1306</a><br>I
2004 Aug 24
1
[LLVMdev] More Encoding Ideas
At 06:08 PM 8/20/2004, you wrote:
>So, to be explicit, what you're advocating is that:
>
>Even Slot Number:
> Type = Types[ slot_num / 2 ]
>Odd Slot Number:
> Type = Pointer[ slot_num / 2 ]
>
>Yes?
Exactly.
>Essentially this eliminates pointer types from the type list altogether.
>Cool idea.
>
>Where's the patch? :)
>
>Seriously
2004 Aug 21
2
[LLVMdev] More Encoding Ideas
At 02:05 PM 8/20/2004, you wrote:
>Robert Mykland wrote:
>>Dear Chris and Reid:
>
>Hi Robert.
>
>>Some other random ideas I've had as I've been sifting through the new
>>bytecode format. Please let me know what you think.
>>1) ANSI C allows for char to default to unsigned char. This is I guess
>>not how it normally is in GCC. If char defaulted
2017 Oct 29
0
Incorrect characters in Chinese font
On 10/29/2017 03:12 PM, H wrote:
> On 10/29/2017 03:49 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 Oct 2017 15:03:49 -0400
>> H wrote:
>>
>>> I had three characters I was not able to translate and after much
>>> hair-pulling realized to my surprise that they may be incorrectly drawn in
>>> Centos 7.
>> My first guess would be a faulty characters in
2004 Jun 12
1
[LLVMdev] getelementptr results in seg-fault.
Hi!
Hmm, ok. I'm using the 1.2 release. Found out that it worked when using
long to index getelementptr, but not when using uint, int or ulong. But
then I'll try with the CVS code instead. Thank you.
, Tobias
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Reid Spencer wrote:
> Hi Tobias,
>
> I tried your test program on the latest CVS code. Everything worked
> fine.
>
> Can you tell me which
2004 Aug 21
0
[LLVMdev] More Encoding Ideas
On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 17:39, Robert Mykland wrote:
> No, you're not getting the point. The bytecode is bloated by pointers to
> all types. Every time a type is defined pretty much a pointer is defined
> with it already, and since the pointer type is not implied by the
> definition of the literal, we waste two or more bytes whenever we define a
> type. I'm advocating
2004 Aug 18
0
[LLVMdev] Re: Bytecodes & docs
MOre feedback inline ...
Robert Mykland wrote:
> Reid,
>
> Thanks for the detailed feedback.
Sure .. devil's in the details :)
> A value of zero now means zero literal for everything except labels,
> right?
Hmm. Not quite sure what you mean here. Zero values are used in quite a few
places for various purposes. For example, the zlist will write a zero byte to
terminate
2020 Feb 05
2
How to distinguish between user defined function in a program and library functions
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div><div dir="ltr">Actually I want to run some analysis pass only on the user defined functions but not on the library functions. Is there any boolean method that can tell which is a library function and which is not? </div><div class="wps_quotion">On 5 Feb 2020 5:23 a.m., David Blaikie
2007 Mar 09
2
Is there any variable for Voicemail Password in Asterisk
Hi guys
This is my Ist post on this group. Is there any variable like ($VM_CALLERID
for voicemail mailbox) for accessing Asterisk Voicemail password which is
set through comedian mail.??????????????
plz reply me as soon as possible....
<html><div><PRE class=quote><IMG height=2
src="http://graphics.hotmail.com/greypixel.gif" width="100%"
2011 Apr 12
0
No subject
r>
<h2>Polycom Phones (updated for 3.2.X firmware with asterisk 1.6.1 Jan/2010=
)
</h2>With SIP 3.2.X firmware (available on the Polycom download site)=20
and Asterisk 1.6.1, Polycom phones now support a full featured BLF=20
showing statuses of Ringing, Inuse and Online and one touch directed=20
call pickup.
<br>On the asterisk side all that needs to be done is to add a hint
2004 Apr 04
2
[LLVMdev] Two important changes to the getelementptr instruction
Hi all,
I just checked in a series of patches that makes some substantial changes
to the LLVM getelementptr instruction. In particular, in LLVM 1.2 and
earlier, the getelementptr instruction required index operands for
structure types to be 'ubyte' constants and index operands for sequential
types to be 'long' values. This had several problems, most notably that
it was