similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm-gcc4 needs update on libstdc++-v3/config/linker-map.gnu ?

Building llvm-gcc4 on Linux requires a little modification to a Makefile. Attached is a patch to insert the following notice into the README.LLVM in llvm-gcc4. Here's the text of the patch, for those that are building llvm-gcc4: On more recent systems (e.g. Fedora Core 5), where the version of libgcc_s.so used by libstdc++.so is more recent than the version used by llvm-gcc, you will get an

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0039 gcc and gcc4 security update for CentOS 4 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0039.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/cpp-3.4.6-11.el4_8.1.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/gcc-3.4.6-11.el4_8.1.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0039 gcc and gcc4 security update for CentOS 4 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0039.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/cpp-3.4.6-11.el4_8.1.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/gcc-3.4.6-11.el4_8.1.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/gcc4-4.1.2-44.EL4_8.1.i386.rpm

Hi, I'm still working on the Fedora Extras package for LLVM. Because of the Fedora requirement that all packages in Extras be built from source, I must build the dreaded C Front End. :) I think I've mostly got things set up correctly, but I've found what I suspect is a tricky problem: make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/adam/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm-1.8/llvm-gcc4-obj/gcc' Checking

Hi Michael, On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 13:13 +0800, Michael T. Richter wrote: > On Tue, 2007-16-01 at 02:50 +0000, Reid Spencer wrote: > > > The build instructions provided tell me to build llvm-gcc first from > > > the source. > > > The source for that tells me to build llvm first from the source. I'm > > > not sure where to go from this point. >

Hi Stefan, On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 23:26 +0100, Stefan Weigert wrote: > hello, > > i am new to llvm and can't manage to compile the gcc backend. Okay. Did you read: http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStartedGuide.html ? > > my steps: > i compile the llvm-source first as suggested in "README.LLVM" > that works fine and without any issues. Okay. > > then i

hello, i am new to llvm and can't manage to compile the gcc backend. my steps: i compile the llvm-source first as suggested in "README.LLVM" that works fine and without any issues. then i make a new dir called build. from there i do the following: stefan at ubuntu:~/programs/llvm/build$ ../llvm-gcc4-1.9.source/configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --prefix=/usr/local/

I'm having some trouble getting llvm-gcc4 to compile. It's unable to compile darwin-crt3.c. It's mentioning "Complex expression. Absolute segment assumed." but I'm not sure if that's a real error message. Has anyone run into this before? I'm running on a G4 apple 10.4.8, kernel version 8.6.0. I googled around and found a bug with the same error message:

First, thanks for testing this! > Here's the results for GNU/Linux, 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5smp (Fedora Core 5) > > HIGH LEVEL COMMENTS > * The llvm-1.9.tar.gz file unpacks to a dir named "llvm". Shouldn't > that be llvm-1.9? We have always labeled the dir just llvm which is fine. If you build llvm it will know its version 1.9. > * LLVM was built in Release mode

Jerry Hom wrote: I haven't seen anyone answer this question yet, so I'll take a crack at it: > First, thanks to those who have responded to my earlier pleas for > help. You have either directly or indirectly helped me find the > answers I needed. I'm slowly getting up to speed with LLVM. Now I > have 2 more questions. > > 1) I'm using LLVM 1.8a with

I'm getting a build error when trying to build gcc4 from sources. This is for the recent 1.9 release. How I built llvm-1.9: ----------------------------- tar zxf llvm-1.9.tar.gz cd llvm-1.9/ ./configure --prefix=/custom/llvm-1.9 make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1 OPTIMIZE_OPTION='-O2' tools-only make install How I built gcc4: ----------------------------- export

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

On Mar 31, 2007, at 11:35 PM, Erick Tryzelaar wrote: > I'm having some trouble getting llvm-gcc4 to compile. It's unable to > compile darwin-crt3.c. It's mentioning "Complex expression. Absolute > segment assumed." but I'm not sure if that's a real error message. Has > anyone run into this before? I'm running on a G4 apple 10.4.8, kernel > version

Hello Philipp. > Why does it need target libraries and binutils? gcc building process (and llvm-gcc4 as well) includes building of target-specific stuff including: 1. Building crt-support code on several platforms 2. Building libgcc.a[.so] 3. Building libstdc++.a[.so] If you don't want them to be built you should, probably you should consult gcc documentation to find right options or

Tanya, Here's the results for GNU/Linux, 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5smp (Fedora Core 5) HIGH LEVEL COMMENTS * The llvm-1.9.tar.gz file unpacks to a dir named "llvm". Shouldn't that be llvm-1.9? * LLVM was built in Release mode in all cases * I don't think this is ready for release. In particular the llvm-gcc4 binary seg faults on FC 5 for most of llvm-test programs. *

I am also trying to build llvm-gcc4 and llvm as you are on amd64 linux. I am currently running into the error "Did not get a target machine!" on the first file compiled by xgcc. Did you encounter this error at all? Also, what distribution did you use? GCC version, and target triple? Thanks, -Chandler Carruth On 12/10/06, Domagoj Babic <babic.domagoj at gmail.com> wrote: >

On Tue, 2007-16-01 at 02:50 +0000, Reid Spencer wrote: > > The build instructions provided tell me to build llvm-gcc first from > > the source. > > The source for that tells me to build llvm first from the source. I'm > > not sure where to go from this point. > You should build llvm first, then llvm-gcc. When I build LLVM first, however, I get told that it

Hello, Paolo. > I hope this is usefull, I'm pretty new to OS X. Well. From your example you have got the only valgrind results: ==28336== 58 bytes in 2 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 70 of 127 ==28336== at 0x4020A92: operator new(unsigned) (in /usr/lib/valgrind/x86-linux/vgpreload_memcheck.so) ==28336== by 0x410010B: std::string::_Rep::_S_create(unsigned, unsigned,

Hi Tanya, Here's my second attempt on Fedora Core 5. The changes this time are: 1. Using GCC 4.0.3 as the compiler 2. Building everything from source (no pre-built binaries used) BUILD LLVM WITH GCC 4.0.3 * No issues, just the usual warnings. BUILD LLVM-GCC WITH GCC 4.0.3 * No issues RUN LLVM-TEST WITH GCC 4.0.3 * The following failures were encountered. Some of them are

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When