similar to: [LLVMdev] going from gcc 4.0.1 to gcc 4.2

Hi Kenneth, On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 11:58 +0100, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > Hello LLVM-people, > > I realize most of you have other things on their head now, with the > 1.9 release coming up, but I'd like to ask some questions regarding > the llvm-gcc frontend. Okay. > The current llvm-gcc4 frontend is based on GCC 4.0.1, as far as I can > tell from the docs. I also

Hi Chris, > > I use NAG with llvm-gcc4. What sort of errors do you get? Did you > configure llvm-test with the appropriate flags to find it? > Yes, I did. llvm-test is configured as follows: (in /work/LLVM/1.8/ llvm/project/llvm-test): ./configure --with-spec2000=/work/SPEC_CPU2000_1.3_src/benchspec -- without-f2c --with-f95-bin=/work/NAG_f95/bin --with-f95-lib=/work/

Hello LLVM-people, I've been trying (on and off) to compile the _full_ SPEC CPU2000 benchmark suite to LLVM bytecode. The biggest problem I'm facing is the Fortran benchmarks, for which some partial support is already available it seems (using f2c). Unfortunately the f2c compiler only allows the translation of Fortran-77 programs to C code (which is then compiled using llvm-gcc).

On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: >> I use NAG with llvm-gcc4. What sort of errors do you get? Did you >> configure llvm-test with the appropriate flags to find it? > Yes, I did. llvm-test is configured as follows: (in /work/LLVM/1.8/ > llvm/project/llvm-test): > ./configure --with-spec2000=/work/SPEC_CPU2000_1.3_src/benchspec -- > without-f2c

On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > I've been trying (on and off) to compile the _full_ SPEC CPU2000 benchmark > suite to LLVM bytecode. The biggest problem > I'm facing is the Fortran benchmarks, for which some partial support is > already available it seems (using f2c). ok. > Unfortunately the f2c compiler only allows the translation of Fortran-77 >

Hi, in a thread this afternoon about compiling the Fortran SPEC2000 to LLVM bytecode, Chris mentioned that it should be possible to compile to LLVM with the gfortran front end, although no one has necessarily tried it. I was surprised (and happy) to hear this, as under the impression that it would require a "complete rewrite of the gfortran backend" [1]. Now, I probably misinterpreted

On 30 Aug 2006, at 23:04, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: >>> I use NAG with llvm-gcc4. What sort of errors do you get? Did >>> you configure llvm-test with the appropriate flags to find it? >> Yes, I did. llvm-test is configured as follows: (in /work/LLVM/ >> 1.8/ llvm/project/llvm-test): >> ./configure

On 25 Nov 2006, at 09:02, Reid Spencer wrote: > Anyone know what to do about this: > > make[4]: Leaving directory `/proj/llvm/llvm-test-1/External/SPEC/ > CFP2000/173.applu' > make[4]: Entering directory `/proj/llvm/llvm-test-1/External/SPEC/ > CFP2000/178.galgel' > /usr/bin/f95 -w -S -O2 /opt/spec/CPU2000v1.3.1/benchspec// > CFP2000/178.galgel/src/modules.f90

Hello, Some problems were solved, new ones arised... Getting closer though... The fixes for the previous problems are at the bottom of this email, bug reports will be submitted when all problems are solved. +++ New/remaining problems +++ Currently, 9/26 benchmarks compile and run succesfully. One (fma3d) still has a f95 related problem (see below). The other 16 are divided into two groups:

Hi all, (Originally posted to r-help) I'm porting a package that I've worked on for OS X to Windows. The package is written in F95 so I need to compile it with gfortran and link it with gcc4. I've been trying to build an R with gcc4 without luck so far. If there is a binary of such a thing info would be appreciated. This package requires a Makefile. My question is, how can I find

Hi Scott, On 18 Mar 2007, at 04:22, Scott Fortmann-Roe wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that LLVM had signed up as a mentoring organization for > Google's summer of code. LLVM looks like an exciting project that > overlaps some of my interests. > > I would be interested in developing an additional front end for a > language it does not currently support (I'm open to

On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > Some problems were solved, new ones arised... Getting closer though... > The fixes for the previous problems are at the bottom of this email, > bug reports will be submitted when all problems are solved. Kenneth, In general, I am more than happy to help people on this list. It is good for the community and I enjoy helping people be successful

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: >> Besides that, I can probably rely on the expierence of some people on >> this mailinglist? > > You can always ask, but realize you are at the mercy of people's > goodwill, so you can't count on anything. In practice, we try to help, > but are often very busy. I understand, but any help I

On 31 Aug 2006, at 23:46, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: >> Bummer. I think I'll contact the NAG support for more info on >> this. Can you >> show me the content of your Makefile.nagfortran? > > It is identical to yours. > >> Also, it is possible to tell make only to compile benchmark X? How >> can I >>

On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Michael McCracken wrote: > Hi, in a thread this afternoon about compiling the Fortran SPEC2000 to > LLVM bytecode, Chris mentioned that it should be possible to compile > to LLVM with the gfortran front end, although no one has necessarily > tried it. Yup. > I was surprised (and happy) to hear this, as under the impression that > it would require a

Anyone know what to do about this: make[4]: Leaving directory `/proj/llvm/llvm-test-1/External/SPEC/CFP2000/173.applu' make[4]: Entering directory `/proj/llvm/llvm-test-1/External/SPEC/CFP2000/178.galgel' /usr/bin/f95 -w -S -O2 /opt/spec/CPU2000v1.3.1/benchspec//CFP2000/178.galgel/src/modules.f90 -o modules.c -fixed -kind=byte -dcfuns -dusty f95: unrecognized option '-kind=byte'

Hello all, I'm wondering if static compilation using llvm-gcc, i.e. including the library code (for example prinft) in the LLVM bytecode, is possible? I've tried adding the -static option to the llvm-gcc4 compiler, but that doesn't seem to change much (I got the same instruction count either with or without the option). Compiling and interpreting a small test program (hello world

During yum update my box crashed (I frequently have this on Centos 4 x86_64 boxes) ---> Package kdebase.x86_64 6:3.3.1-5.8 set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: system-config-printer = 0.6.116-1.centos4.1 for package: system-config-printer-gui --> Processing Dependency: glibc-devel = 2.3.4-2.9 for package: nptl-devel --> Processing Dependency:

Hi Kenneth, On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 10:12 +0100, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > > > > ? > > > > This man page: > > http://www.die.net/doc/linux/man/man1/gfortran.1.html > > > > says there's no such option as -kind > > > > Do I need some special version of f95 to run the SPEC2K tests? > > If I'm correct, f95 has nothing to do with GCC. As

On 01 Sep 2006, at 10:05, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > >> >>> Also, it is possible to tell make only to compile benchmark X? How >>> can I >>> enforce this? >> >> Go into the directory for that benchmark, then run 'make' or >> whatever. > I tried tom compile each of the SPEC CPU2000 benchmarks using the make command is each respective