similar to: [LLVMdev] llvmdev offline for testing

Dear list members, On Monday, October 30, at 11 am Central Time, the llvmdev mailing list will be offline for some testing. The testing should last about 15-20 minutes and will hopefully shed some light on why the mailing list is taking so long to deliver email to some people. I will send mail to the list when the testing begins and ends. During the tests, I will be disabling a few email

Hello all, I've a box running Samba 3.5.6 (Debian Squeeze) that retrieves its user accounts from AD, using Winbind. The box is receiving incoming mail. Idmap backend is AD, with rfc2307 schema mode. Currently it's only accessing one AD DC, and the MTA on the Samba box is stopped whenever the DC is temporarily offline to prevent rejection of any incoming mail with "user unknown"

Attention all List Members: We are in the process of migrating all Red Hat lists from the current list manager software/server running qmail/Smartlist to a new server running postfix and GNU Mailman (*). Within the next week you will receive more information about this migration including information on how to access your membership, including subscribe/unsubscribe information and instructions on

On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 11:58:23 +0200 Martin Krämer <mk.maddin at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > thanks for your reply. > > > I personally would have used 'cache directory =' , see 'man > > smb.conf' for the difference. > From description based on man smb.conf I would absolutely agree. > I have tried and set the "cache directory"

>> Please note that we have other users that use PG_offline + refcount >= 1 >> (HyperV balloon, XEN). We should not affect these users (IOW, >> has_unmovable_pages() has to stop right there if we see one of these pages). > > OK, this is exactly what I was worried about. I can see why you might > want to go an easier way and rule those users out but wouldn't be it

Hi All, We're really having problems with Offline Files/Folders and Vista sp1 laptops/desktops. We working with Microsoft just now to debug this as we're registered partners (for testing Samba/LDAP etc.). We now have a massive thread going in the private Vista 4-hr response support forums and we're on to log files debugging Vista side. We've cleared CSC etc. applied the

Dear All, The LLVM network services (llvm.org web site, SVN server, etc.) will be offline starting at 10:30 am Central Time on Tuesday, March 8. We are moving the machine hosting these services to the server room where it will be a dedicated server machine from Tuesday henceforth. I expect the move will take less than 15 minutes. I will email the list about an hour before the move as a

On 23.10.19 11:43, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 22-10-19 16:02:09, David Hildenbrand wrote: > [...] >>>>> MEM_CANCEL_OFFLINE could gain the reference back to balance the >>>>> MEM_GOING_OFFLINE step. >>>> >>>> The pages are already unisolated and could be used by the buddy. But again, >>>> I think you have an idea that tries

Dear All, Just a reminder that the maintenance will be commencing now. -- John T. John Criswell wrote: > Dear LLVMers and Clangers, > > We'll be doing some maintenance on the LLVM repository on Tuesday, Sept. > 14 (tomorrow). There were some files committed to the repository that > we believe need to be removed from both mainline, the branches, and the > revision

John Criswell wrote: > Dear All, > > Just a reminder that the maintenance will be commencing now. > Also, I managed to set things up so that you can use svn diff and svn up but not svn commit (I basically disabled commit access for everyone for the time being). -- John T. > -- John T. > > John Criswell wrote: > >> Dear LLVMers and Clangers, >>

March or April? ;) -Tanya On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, John Criswell wrote: > Dear All, > > The LLVM network services (llvm.org web site, SVN server, etc.) will be > offline starting at 10:30 am Central Time on Tuesday, March 8. We are > moving the machine hosting these services to the server room where it > will be a dedicated server machine from Tuesday henceforth. > > I

Once working they are great, but getting offline folders to re-synch can sometimes waste many tens of minutes. Right now I have a Windows 2000 laptop with a Samba server's existing public folder share set as offline within network hood on the laptop (\\Emerald\Public). The Windows laptop and the Samba server are in the same workgroup. Other Windows clients can browse to the Samba server, get

Dear LLVMers and Clangers, We'll be doing some maintenance on the LLVM repository on Tuesday, Sept. 14 (tomorrow). There were some files committed to the repository that we believe need to be removed from both mainline, the branches, and the revision history. The SVN repository will go *off-line* at 7:00 am Central Daylight Savings time on Tuesday. Please do not make any commits after

On Tue 22-10-19 16:02:09, David Hildenbrand wrote: [...] > >>> MEM_CANCEL_OFFLINE could gain the reference back to balance the > >>> MEM_GOING_OFFLINE step. > >> > >> The pages are already unisolated and could be used by the buddy. But again, > >> I think you have an idea that tries to avoid putting pages to the buddy. > > > > Yeah,

On Tue 22-10-19 16:02:09, David Hildenbrand wrote: [...] > >>> MEM_CANCEL_OFFLINE could gain the reference back to balance the > >>> MEM_GOING_OFFLINE step. > >> > >> The pages are already unisolated and could be used by the buddy. But again, > >> I think you have an idea that tries to avoid putting pages to the buddy. > > > > Yeah,

Hello, we have some trouble with our Win7 clients accessing our Samba server. OS: RHEL 5.5 (same with RHEL 4) Sambaversion: 3.5.3 (same with 3.3.8) Sambaconfig: ?? ?... ?? ?security = ADS ?? ?passdb backend = tdbsam ?? ?oplocks = yes ??? level2 oplocks = yes ??? kernel oplocks = no ?? ?... The problems begin when users want to make their samba shares available offline. The sync process on the

Hi John- Will this also mean a purging of the llvm-commits archive, to remove the diffs with the guilty files in them? Alistair On 14 Sep 2010, at 01:38, John Criswell wrote: > Dear LLVMers and Clangers, > > We'll be doing some maintenance on the LLVM repository on Tuesday, Sept. > 14 (tomorrow). There were some files committed to the repository that > we believe need to

Hello, Below you will find a snippet from the output of running an offline backup. I'm specifically concerned with "Failed to open /usr/local/samba/private/netlogon_creds_cli.tdb". is this an issue or can it be safely ignored? I ask because the offline process appears to otherwise run without issue. Server is Ubuntu 22.04 with Samba 4.19.2 built from source. Starting

Once stop_machine() is gone from the CPU offline path, we won't be able to depend on disabling preemption to prevent CPUs from going offline from under us. Use the get/put_online_cpus_atomic() APIs to prevent CPUs from going offline, while invoking from atomic context. Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk at oracle.com> Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy at goop.org> Cc: Thomas

Once stop_machine() is gone from the CPU offline path, we won't be able to depend on disabling preemption to prevent CPUs from going offline from under us. Use the get/put_online_cpus_atomic() APIs to prevent CPUs from going offline, while invoking from atomic context. Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk at oracle.com> Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy at goop.org> Cc: Thomas