similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM for numerical computations

On 4 Apr 2007, at 20:10, Jeff Cohen wrote: > […] > %obj = alloca %struct.TestClass, align 1 ; <%struct.TestClass*> > [#uses=1] > %tmp1 = call int %_ZN9TestClass10testMethodEi( %struct.TestClass* % > obj, int 1 ) ; <int> [#uses=0] > ret void > } > > declare int %_ZN9TestClass10testMethodEi(%struct.TestClass*, int) The name mangling is not very pretty

Luc Bourhis wrote: > On 4 Apr 2007, at 20:10, Jeff Cohen wrote: > > >> […] >> %obj = alloca %struct.TestClass, align 1 ; <%struct.TestClass*> >> [#uses=1] >> %tmp1 = call int %_ZN9TestClass10testMethodEi( %struct.TestClass* % >> obj, int 1 ) ; <int> [#uses=0] >> ret void >> } >> >> declare int

Ferad Zyulkyarov wrote: > Hi, > > I want to ask for a small help for creating an instruction that calls > e member method of an object. I suppose that this is not a headache > but I am impatient in learning :) I would be very thankful if you can > show me an example snippet code that does this in LLVM. Below is > described my case. > > Let's say I have a class

Hola LLVMers, I'm having a tricky time diagnosing something that is going on in my program and am hoping some of you might have used LLVM in a similar way before. All of this is using LLVM 1.9 on Mac OSX. Here is our usage pattern: 1. Read in a program in a language we are designing 2. Transform it into LLVM IR using the llvm class hierarchy 3. Link this module to a set of support

Hi, I want to ask for a small help for creating an instruction that calls e member method of an object. I suppose that this is not a headache but I am impatient in learning :) I would be very thankful if you can show me an example snippet code that does this in LLVM. Below is described my case. Let's say I have a class TestClass class TestClass { int testMethod(int a); } and I want to

Hello, I am trying to cross-compile libc++ from my x86_64 linux system to armv7hf. We have our own gcc compiler that we build with crosstools-ng (based on gcc 6.3.0) and I set my environment like this: CC=armv7a-plex-linux-gnueabihf-gcc CXX=armv7a-plex-linux-gnueabihf-g++ CFLAGS=-fPIC -DPIC -mfloat-abi=hard -march=armv7-a -Os -mfpu=vfpv3-d16 --sysroot=<path> CXXFLAGS=-fPIC -DPIC

cmake -E cmake_progress_report llvm-3.8.0.src_bld_x86_64-rhel6.4-linux-gnu/CMakeFiles In file included from llvm-3.8.0.src/projects/libcxx/include/__hash_table:19:0, from llvm-3.8.0.src/projects/libcxx/src/hash.cpp:10: llvm-3.8.0.src/projects/libcxx/include/cmath:310:9: error: '::signbit' has not been declared using ::signbit; ^

At first glance, it looks like long double functions (such as fabsl and friends) are missing from your sysroot's <math.h>. Does your target support long double at all? -Dimitry > On 6 Feb 2018, at 09:51, Tobias Hieta via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hello, > > I am trying to cross-compile libc++ from my x86_64 linux system to armv7hf. We have

Hello, I am trying to cross-compile libc++ from my x86_64 linux system to armv7hf. We have our own gcc compiler that we build with crosstools-ng (based on gcc 6.3.0) and I set my environment like this: CC=armv7a-plex-linux-gnueabihf-gcc CXX=armv7a-plex-linux-gnueabihf-g++ CFLAGS=-fPIC -DPIC -mfloat-abi=hard -march=armv7-a -Os -mfpu=vfpv3-d16 --sysroot=<path> CXXFLAGS=-fPIC -DPIC

Hello Dimitry and thanks for your answer. I am pretty sure it does indeed support long double. It's configured with vfpv3-d16 - but I noticed that c++config.h in gcc has _GLIBCXX__HAS_FABSL and friends are undefined. I think I need to look deeper at the configuration of our toolchain. long double support is required in libc++ then I gather? -- Tobias On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:47 AM,

Greetings! I have been building llvm-3.6.x, 3.7.1 and 3.7.2 with (glibc-2.12.1, binutils-2.24, gcc-4.9.2) almost same set if CMake flags. However while building LLVM-3.8.0 using same CMake flags I am observing projects/libcxx/include/cmath errors... ...'::signbit' has not been declared ...'::fpclassify' has not been declared ...'::isfinite' has not been declared ...

Hi Brian, I've been playing around with your test programs and came to the result: --------------------- #ifdef __INTERIX # define _GLIBCPP_USE_C99 1 //Define this macro before including isnan() function from cmath #endif #include <cmath> using std::isnan; int foo(float f) {return isnan(f);} --------------------- /Henrik >From: "Brian R. Gaeke" <gaeke at

Hi Brian Here's the config.log (I'm not posting it on the dev-list). The automatic gcc macro for Interix is __INTERIX if this is to any help. /Henrik >From: "Brian R. Gaeke" <gaeke at uiuc.edu> >Reply-To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> >To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev]

Hi >From: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> >Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:43:27 -0500 (CDT) >Ah, suddenly everything makes sense. If you're interested in LLVM on the >windows platform, *please* get CVS. Last night I've got the latest version of LLVM from CVS and now porting LLVM to Interix from this version on. I got this error: --------------------- gmake[1]:

Hi, I am observing a strange behaviour in which Clang ignores __restirct when I include some standard headers. For example, this code: void vec_add(int* __restrict a, int* __restrict b, int n) { #pragma unroll 4 for(int i=0; i<n; ++i) { a[i] += b[i]; } } results in: ; Function Attrs: nofree norecurse nounwind define dso_local void @_Z7vec_addPiS_i(i32*

when i try to install openh323gk i get the following error please help ldaplink.cxx:345: call of overloaded `pow(double, unsigned int&)' is ambiguous /usr/include/bits/mathcalls.h:143: candidates are: double pow(double, double) /usr/include/g++/cmath:427: long double std::pow(long double, int) /usr/include/g++/cmath:423: float std::pow(float, int)

At this point I would just due: formals(body(method)[[2L]]) At some point we need to figure out what to do with this .local() confusion. On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Roebuck,Paul L <PLRoebuck at mdanderson.org> wrote: > I'm attempting to reflect the information for use with corresponding > fields in GUI (in a different package), to provide default values, > argname

(Please wrap your lines.) On Oct 26 01:38:34, Ulrich.Windl at rz.uni-regensburg.de wrote: > Playing with Opus 1.3 I converted a tone sweep with a sample rate of 96kHz (just for fun). Before I had converted that from WAV to FLAC, and to Vorbis without problems. Can you please post the original wav? I am not sure what Audacity means by a logarithmisch sweep. Is that a fixed number of Hertz per

Would you please clarify your exact use case? Thanks, Michael On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Roebuck,Paul L <PLRoebuck at mdanderson.org> wrote: > Interrogating some (of my own) code in another package. > > >norm.meth <- getMethod("normalize", "MatrixLike") > >message("str(norm.meth)") > >str(norm.meth) > >

>>> Jan Stary <hans at stare.cz> schrieb am 05.11.2018 um 11:05 in Nachricht <20181105100534.GB44329 at www.stare.cz>: > (Are we off‑list now by intention?) No, just fooled by the list defaults (some need just reply, others need reply to all) > >> Did you also try to listen at the beginning, shortly before the real tone > appears in the audible spectrum?