similar to: [LLVMdev] lli in interpreter mode and external native libraries

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] lli in interpreter mode and external native libraries"

2006 Oct 26
0
[LLVMdev] lli in interpreter mode and external native libraries
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Sarah Thompson wrote: > Is there any way to support calling external libraries from interpreted > code (*not* JITted code) within lli? Sure. > I am looking at the external functions implementation, and it seems just > to wrap back onto its own library, looking up lli_X_... prefixed > functions. It would (for obvious reasons) be incredibly useful not to be >
2006 Oct 26
2
[LLVMdev] lli in interpreter mode and external native libraries
Chris Lattner wrote: > 3. Best: Find a "foreign function interface" library, and use that to > interface to native code. > This is the only option that's really usable, unfortunately, because I have no control over what code some potential user might want to model check. I was wondering whether there might be anything in the JIT support that could be reused for
2006 Oct 26
2
[LLVMdev] lli in interpreter mode and external native libraries
Chris Lattner wrote: > > The JIT has a superset of this functionality. However, if there is JIT > support for the host that you are interested in, you shouldn't have to use > the interpreter at all. > > For interpreting, yes, but model checking is weirder so it's greatly beneficial to be able to heavily hack an interpreter. >> I can't really move to using
2006 Oct 26
0
[LLVMdev] lli in interpreter mode and external native libraries
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Sarah Thompson wrote: > Chris Lattner wrote: >> 3. Best: Find a "foreign function interface" library, and use that to >> interface to native code. >> > This is the only option that's really usable, unfortunately, because I > have no control over what code some potential user might want to model > check. Ok. > I was wondering
2006 Oct 28
0
[LLVMdev] lli in interpreter mode and external native libraries
>>> I can't really move to using the JIT entirely because I want to replace >>> the memory model with something that supports backtracking -- this is >>> doable (fairly) straightforwardly with the interpreter, but it would >>> require some very complicated transformations to the code in order to do >>> this within the JIT environment, and it would
2011 Jun 15
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM interpreter does not support fmod
It seems llvm interpreter only supports a limited number of external functions. fmod, in particular is not supported. any reason why it is not supported ? "lli -force-interpreter test.bc LLVM ERROR: Tried to execute an unknown external function: double (double, double)* fmod " -- Kind Regards Xin Tong -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2005 Feb 25
0
[LLVMdev]Linker error building (modified) lli
Linking lli debug executable (without symbols) /mounts/zion/disks/0/localhome/pmeredit/llvm/lib/Debug/lli-interpreter.o(.te xt+0x643a): In function `llvm::Interpreter::callExternalFunction(llvm::Function*, std::vector<llvm::GenericValue, std::allocator<llvm::GenericValue> > const&)': /localhome/pmeredit/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Interpreter/ExternalFunctions.c pp:98: undefined
2010 Feb 26
1
[LLVMdev] lli --force-interpreter does not find external function
Hello everyone, I'm trying to run a LLVM-Bytecode-file in the interpreter (lli --force-interpreter), but i'm getting the following error-message: LLVM ERROR: Tried to execute an unknown external function: i8* (i32)* malloc My program is calling malloc. If I omit --force-interpreter everything runs as expected. Compiling to Assembler also works without problems. I have compiled LLVM with
2011 Aug 24
0
[LLVMdev] lli interpreter fails to execute external functions
Hi all I compiled LLVM using ./configure --enable-assertions --enable-debug-runtime --enable-debug-symbols --enable-docs --enable-shared --enable-libffi --disable-optimized And then try to execute a .bc file using lli, ${LLVM_HOME}/Debug+Asserts/bin/lli -debug -force-interpreter ./jpegant.bc It reports : About to interpret: %9 = call i8* @memset(i8* %8, i32 0, i32 122)LLVM ERROR: Tried
2009 Nov 17
0
[LLVMdev] lli -force-interpreter complains about external function
Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: > Nick Lewycky<nicholas at mxc.ca> writes: >> The interpreter uses libffi to make external function calls. However, it >> needs to be detected at LLVM's compile time. If you're using the >> released packages, we disabled that because we were worried about users >> who don't have libffi installed. > > This seems to be
2009 Nov 16
0
[LLVMdev] lli -force-interpreter complains about external function
Xu Yang wrote: > Hi: > > When I try to execute lli -force-interpreter=true hello.bc, it gave the > following error: > > LLVM ERROR: Tried to execute an unknown external function: i32 (i8*)* puts > > I think the error is because C library is not being linked with the byte > code, but I was not able to find any helpful instruction in lli's document. > > Can you
2009 Nov 16
3
[LLVMdev] lli -force-interpreter complains about external function
Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> writes: > The interpreter uses libffi to make external function calls. However, it > needs to be detected at LLVM's compile time. If you're using the > released packages, we disabled that because we were worried about users > who don't have libffi installed. This seems to be quite a common problem (I too hit it once, thought it
2009 Nov 18
1
[LLVMdev] lli -force-interpreter complains about external function
Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> writes: > Thanks for the reminder. I recall looking at the patch but I didn't > apply it at the time because I couldn't figure out why the code above > it used errs() in one case and llvm_report_error in another. What was the reason? (I think I too wondered that.)
2011 Jun 15
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM interpreter does not support fmod
Hi, > It seems llvm interpreter only supports a limited number of external > functions. fmod, in particular is not supported. any reason why it is not > supported ? > > "lli -force-interpreter test.bc > LLVM ERROR: Tried to execute an unknown external function: double (double, > double)* fmod > " You can check out the comments in
2009 Nov 16
2
[LLVMdev] lli -force-interpreter complains about external function
Hi: When I try to execute lli -force-interpreter=true hello.bc, it gave the following error: LLVM ERROR: Tried to execute an unknown external function: i32 (i8*)* puts I think the error is because C library is not being linked with the byte code, but I was not able to find any helpful instruction in lli's document. Can you please teach me how to do it? Thanks Xu The hello.bc is
2009 Nov 18
0
[LLVMdev] lli -force-interpreter complains about external function
Hi Nick: The first problem have been solved by calling llvm-ld: $ llvm-ld -o hellosin.llvm hellosin.bc -lm $ lli -force-interpreter=true -load=/usr/lib/libm.so hellosin.llvm.bc hello sin: 0.50 The pthread problem remains after llvm-ld: $ lli -force-interpreter=true -load=/lib/libpthread.so.0 phello.llvm.bc 0 lli 0x08796bf8 Segmentation fault For those who are getting "invalid
2011 Jun 15
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM interpreter does not support fmod
On Jun 14, 2011, at 7:57 PM, 陳韋任 wrote: > Hi, > >> It seems llvm interpreter only supports a limited number of external >> functions. fmod, in particular is not supported. any reason why it is not >> supported ? >> >> "lli -force-interpreter test.bc >> LLVM ERROR: Tried to execute an unknown external function: double (double, >> double)* fmod
2009 Nov 18
2
[LLVMdev] lli -force-interpreter complains about external function
Hi Nick: Thanks for pointing me to libffi. Recompile LLVM with libffi does solve the problem of printf. But it still has other problems: 1) sinf() returns 0 in the interpreter, but returns correct value in JIT (see hellosin.c) 2) calling pthread_create cause lli to crash in the interpreter mode, but no problem in JIT (see phello.c). My questions are: i) can I call any arbitrary external function
2009 Nov 18
0
[LLVMdev] lli -force-interpreter complains about external function
Hi Nick: Thanks for the response. You are right about sinf. I changed the constant to sscanf(argv[1], ...), and it gave me back 0 again. I also compared the disassembled code, and saw it was indeed the case. The primary reason I use interpreter is because I wish to do runtime checking on memory access pattern in multithreaded C programs. for example, if thread one is in the critical section, I
2009 Nov 18
3
[LLVMdev] lli -force-interpreter complains about external function
Xu Yang wrote: > Hi Nick: > > The first problem have been solved by calling llvm-ld: > > $ llvm-ld -o hellosin.llvm hellosin.bc -lm > $ lli -force-interpreter=true -load=/usr/lib/libm.so hellosin.llvm.bc > hello sin: 0.50 Only because the optimizer saw sin(constant) and folded it away. The entire program became 'print constant string'. There is certainly a bug