similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm2cpp: invalid bytecode signature

>-----Original Message----- >From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu >[mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Chris Lattner >Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 2:09 PM >To: LLVM Developers Mailing List >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] initializer does not match global variable type. > >On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, Anderson, Todd A wrote: >> I have an objective-c file, bar.m,

Hi Todd, On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 14:04 -0700, Anderson, Todd A wrote: > >-----Original Message----- > >From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu > >[mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Chris Lattner > >Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 2:09 PM > >To: LLVM Developers Mailing List > >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] initializer does not match global variable type.

Hi, I am using visual studio 2008's generated solution file for clang/llvm. I was looking at the online demo where it gives out llvm2cpp program along with the llvm IR of the C code. I could not find any executable in the /bin directory for llvm2cpp. I was wondering if there is either source or executable of the llvm2cpp program that is used by llvm demo available for either llvm-2.7

I am trying to disassemble some bytecode using llvm-dis: llvm-dis -f -o llvmtest/sliceme2.cbc.ll llvmtest/sliceme2.cbc However, I am getting the following error. llvm-dis: Invalid bytecode signature: 464C457F (Vers=0, Pos=4) How do I go about figuring out what the problem is? llvmtest/sliceme2.cbc is newly compiled using the same version of llvm-gcc as llvm-dis. -- Ryan M. Lefever

I have an objective-c file, bar.m, that I try to process in the following way generating the error shown below. Any help would be appreciated. I suspect the error is in the first few lines of output. thanks, Todd > cfrontend-g++ -o bar.bc bar.m > llvm2cpp -o bar.cpp bar.bc > g++ -c bar.o bar.cpp > ld -o bar bar.o -l objc -l LLVMCore -l LLVMSupport -l LLVMSystem > ./bar Global

Hi Ryan, On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 18:06 -0600, Ryan M. Lefever wrote: > I am trying to disassemble some bytecode using llvm-dis: > llvm-dis -f -o llvmtest/sliceme2.cbc.ll llvmtest/sliceme2.cbc > > However, I am getting the following error. > > llvm-dis: Invalid bytecode signature: 464C457F (Vers=0, Pos=4) The problem is most likely that sliceme2.cbc is *not* bytecode. Open the

Hello everybody, So I am having some problems with llvm. When I've tried a lot of times to run and re-install the llvm, but the same error appears, so: esbox at embedded2i:~/llvm/projects/teste$ llvm-gcc hello.c -o hello esbox at embedded2i:~/llvm/projects/teste$ ls hello hello.c esbox at embedded2i:~/llvm/projects/teste$ ./hello Hello World esbox at

+Bill who worked on the attribute change On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Harris BAKIRAS <h.bakiras at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > We are using the llvm2cpp feature of LLVM in the VMKit project and there are > some issues that I would like to point out. > > I made a tiny reproducible example here, to be clear: > > echo "int main() { return 0; };"

Hi everyone, We are using the llvm2cpp feature of LLVM in the VMKit project and there are some issues that I would like to point out. I made a tiny reproducible example here, to be clear: echo "int main() { return 0; };" > test.c && clang test.c -emit-llvm -c -o - | llc -march=cpp -cppgen=function -cppfor=main -o - This command is supposed to generate the C++ code to

Thank you for the help. There seem to be several things in my makefiles that are messed up as a result of switching from the gcc3.4 front end to the gcc4 frontend. Is there any documentation listing the things that have changed? Thanks, Ryan Ryan M. Lefever [http://www.ews.uiuc.edu/~lefever] On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Reid Spencer wrote: > Hi Ryan, > > On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 18:06

> On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, [UTF-8] Rafael Esp?ndola wrote: > > > I am trying to bootstrap the just released gcc 4.0.1 and the cvs head llvm. > > > > I was able to build the llvm tools without a problem. > > gcc has a small problem (from the apple branch IIRC): libojc is built > > unconditionally, so objc must be in the --enable-languages option for > > the

> Some weeks ago i talked to someone at #LLVM and he told me that versions of > llvm and gcc aren't sycronized. But i don't know how to do this. If you are using svn, you should keep llvm and llvm-gcc both at the same rev number to be safe. For llvm-gcc 2.3, you should use llvm 2.3. You can't use llvm-gcc 2.3 with llvm svn TOT for example. What version of llvm and llvm-gcc

I am not using svn and llvm version is 2.3 and llvm-gcc is 4.2.1 2008/7/3 Tanya M. Lattner <tonic at nondot.org>: > > > Some weeks ago i talked to someone at #LLVM and he told me that versions > of > > llvm and gcc aren't sycronized. But i don't know how to do this. > > If you are using svn, you should keep llvm and llvm-gcc both at the same > rev number

> I am not using svn and llvm version is 2.3 and llvm-gcc is 4.2.1 And llvm-gcc is also from the 2.3 release? If so, I'm guessing you have an older version of llvm or llvm-gcc in your path somewhere and that is being used instead. Ciao, Duncan.

Hi there, I'm trying to build llvm under cygwin running under windows xp, and have struck the following problem: -- llvm: tools-only built ok -- cfrontend: built ok -- llvm: full build failed at the following point: make[3]: Entering directory `/cygdrive/d/3rd-party/llvm/runtime/GCCLibraries/crtend' Compiling crtend.c to bytecode Compiling listend.ll to bytecode Linking comp_main.bc

Last night's nightly test has numerous new failures that can be attributed to the bug 122 changes. All these failures are related to the use of an outdated cfrontend build. The simple solution is to recompile the cfrontend. I ran into this also when I was testing the changes. The problem is that the bytecode read/written by the cfrontend is using an incompatible (partially between 1.2 and

On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 10:49:44 -0700 Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > Jeff, > > Actually, that was my fault. I forgot to remove the non-existent > directories from the configure.ac file. That's done and committed > now, so the advice is still the same: update configure script :) > > Reid. OK, no problems building. I got some minor issues with the simple

>> Maybe I wasn't >> clear. The "g++" is ordinary vanilla g++, not llvm-g++. Are there >> any versioning issues with regular g++ compiling llvm2cpp generated >> C++ files? > >This could be the weak link. llvm2cpp is a relatively new and fairly >untested addition to the llvm toolsuite. Its purposes are more for >instruction and example

Okay, let me reiterate. The llvm2cpp option is *already* on the demo script page. If you choose that option, you just get an error message because llvm2cpp can't be found. Its harmless and everything else still works. I won't change the script for a couple of weeks, per Tanya's and your request. Reid. On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 10:48 -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 10 Aug

It's already messed with, but there's no harm. If someone turns on the llvm2cpp option, then they get an error message at the bottom of the output page. All other output is normal. So, there's no harm in it. If/when llvm2cpp becomes available on Zion, people then the llvm2cpp output will appear. Note that llvm2cpp is a 1.8 release feature. My change was to help people learning LLVM