similar to: [LLVMdev] Porting LLVM to irix.

Aaron Gray wrote: > On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca > <mailto:nicholas at mxc.ca>> wrote: > > Aaron Gray wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca > <mailto:nicholas at mxc.ca> > > <mailto:nicholas at mxc.ca <mailto:nicholas at mxc.ca>>> wrote:

On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: > Aaron Gray wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca > > <mailto:nicholas at mxc.ca>> wrote: > > > > Aaron Gray wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca > >

Hi, I am trying to install llvm 2.5 in my PowerPC machine. I have already installed XCode Tools 2.4.1. I can compile programs using gcc run them. I try to configure llvm 2.5, the configuration aborts with following message: checking build system type... powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0 checking host system type... powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0 checking target system type... powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0

Hi again, I wrote: > > I would like to test but the I modigied the configure to make > > unknown = OpenBSD and Unix > > Have you looked at ./config.log. ./configure creates this as it runs > as a trace of the path it took through ./configure. Work backwards > from the end to find out what it didn't like. I remember SourceForge's compile farm has an OpenBSD x86

Hi Josephm > I would like to test but the I modigied the configure to make unknown > = OpenBSD and Unix and go pretty far but it died right after 'supports > mkdir' yes... Could that have been `checking for mkdir...'? > then the next line was 'your system is unsupported'' Have you looked at ./config.log. ./configure creates this as it runs as a trace of the

I just added __OpenBSD__ everywhere __FreeBSD__ was being tested (there were about a dozen places). I suspect we'll have to add one for NetBSD also one day (even DragonflyBSD?). INT8_MAX and friends ought to be declared by <stdint.h>. It is on FreeBSD. Ralph Corderoy wrote: >Hi again, > >I wrote: > > >>>I would like to test but the I modigied the

I'll Check it out.. is it in the CVS or the release yet.. or how do I apply a patch to it... thanks much for the update.. I'll feel better about the whole thing..OpenBSD is really nice with the pro-police stack and would like to see an alternative to the GCC only compiler chain of tools especially as it is based on a somewhat archaic optiminzation backend and procedural stuff is pretty

I would like to test but the I modigied the configure to make unknown = OpenBSD and Unix and go pretty far but it died right after 'supports mkdir' yes... then the next line was 'your system is unsupported'' I have gcc 3.3 on OpenBSD 3.3 pro-police stack compiler... I am only really interested in testing the C/C++ but C primarily for my work. regards, Joseph Altea

> Could you please rig Makefile.rules or something to print out the value > of $(LLVM_ON_WIN32) ? The only way I can think of this happening is if > that's erroneously false. The configure script sets LLVM_ON_UNIX, not LLVM_ON_WIN32, for Cygwin: case $host in ... *-*-cygwin*) llvm_cv_link_all_option="-Wl,--whole-archive"

I'm writing a JIT for my toy language, and I'm confused by one thing. How do I, with IR Builder, Insert a pointer constant? For the first version of my jit, I really only need LLVM to pass around opaque types and then pass those variables to C functions that return other opaque types. So for instance, I have a Int object that wraps the GNU GMP routines. A want to be able to tell IRBuilder

I'd like to do some simple C# -> LLVM C API bindings for windows. Is there a place I can get pre-built LLVM .dlls for windows? Thanks Timothy -- “One of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that–lacking zero–they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C programs.” (Robert Firth) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

I'm working on implementing a simple functional language in LLVM. It's statically typed, but I'd like to a have some simple multimethods involved. Does LLVM have some intrinsics for handling something like C++ vtables? Or do I need to implement my own way of handling single-dispatch functions? Thanks, Timothy -- “One of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was

Maybe I'm not doing something right here, but there is a rather simple bug in the Autoconfig.sh script. It currently checks for the version numbers in aclocal and libtool. However it only accepts a certain value, instead of that version and all newer versions. Is there a reason for this? Or is this a bug? Timothy -- "... one of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that,

Some low-priority fixes to the build system.... These can probably wait after 2.2 1) The current configure script checks for gcc 3.x or later by parsing "gcc --version" output and trying to tokenize it to find the major compiler version. This is pretty fragile and interacts poorly with compilers produced by vendors (like Apple) that modify this string to output target triple

1. Create an extern global variable of the type being pointed to. Use ExecutionEngine::addGlobalMapping to map that extern global variable to the pointer. Then your IR code can refer to the extern global variable and get the pointer. 2. Convert the pointer to an int. Create an int constant in IR. Then add an inttoptr instruction, and your IR has the pointer constant. Last I checked, though,

In the creation of dynamic languages we often have to box values together. For instance, take the following expression: IntObj c = sqrt((a*a)+(b*b)); Here, most likely, a bytecode interpreter would execute this as "mul_ints", "add_ints", "sqrt", etc. Inside these primitive functions we would have to unwrap our IntObj types, add the values, allocate a new object and

Shantonu, I just wanted to verify that you used the llvm/autoconf/AutoRegen.sh script to regenerate configure. Is that correct? Thanks, Tanya On Feb 5, 2008, at 10:10 AM, Shantonu Sen wrote: > Some low-priority fixes to the build system.... These can probably > wait after 2.2 > > 1) The current configure script checks for gcc 3.x or later by > parsing "gcc

On OSX I thought I'd try to optimize my compiler a bit by switching some of the calling conventions from CCallingConv to FastCC. The compiler ran fine, but when I executed the code, I got "Bad Instruction 4". I'm seeing some other mentions on this mailing list of issues like this on OSX (I'm using 10.8). Is there anything I need to change to enable fastcc with my compiler? I

I installed 2.5.1p2 on an irix system and noticed that if a user logged in typed "logname" it was providing the wrong username. File creations were correct, "w" produces the correct output....so something is funky in p2 that wasn't there in p1.

I'm writing a compiler using LLVM, and suddenly today I started to get this error, when emitting to a .s file. Assertion failed: (I != M+Size && I->FromReg == RegNum && "Invalid RegNum"), function getLLVMRegNum, file MCRegisterInfo.cpp, line 78. I'm emitting using x86_64-apple-darwin. Any thoughts about what could be causing this? LLVM validation does not