similar to: [LLVMdev] why c++?

Hi, sorry, just hit the enter key by accident. Anyway, why was llvm was written in c++? c and python, c and ocaml, c and java i would more prefer. I am not a flamethrower(sorry again if it was.) Just another newbie. TIA 2006/8/17, l l <happyarch at gmail.com>: > >

On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, l l wrote: > sorry, just hit the enter key by accident. > Anyway, why was llvm was written in c++? > > c and python, c and ocaml, c and java i would more prefer. > > I am not a flamethrower(sorry again if it was.) Just another newbie. If you want to write a new compiler, you're free to do it in a language of your choice. LLVM is written primarily in

On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, l l wrote: > 2006/8/17, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org>: >> LLVM is written primarily in C++, for a variety of reasons, > Hi, > > Please give me one reason, ok, I like BCPL comments. > Btw, emacs is fine with lisp, c and eclipse is fine with Java. > That was interesting fact to me. Please stop, this is totally off-topic for this list.

2006/8/17, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org>: > LLVM is written primarily in C++, for a variety of reasons, Hi, Please give me one reason, Btw, emacs is fine with lisp, c and eclipse is fine with Java. That was interesting fact to me.

dear R wizards: while extolling the virtues of R, one of my young econometrics colleagues told me that he still wants to run ox because [a] his code is written in it (good reason); [b] because ox seems to be faster than R in most benchmarks (huh?). this got me to wonder. language speed can't matter much, so it must be mostly the underlying matrix algebra by now. I presume that nowadays

SUCCESS! Sorry, I had removed the addFnAttr() call by accident. Using the basicAA pass and ReadOnly, as you suggested, works like a charm! :) > -----Original Message----- > From: Rob Pieke > Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 4:40 PM > To: 'Duncan Sands' > Cc: 'llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu'; 'Dan Gohman' > Subject: RE: [LLVMdev] Optimization of calls to

On Nov 28, 2007, at 15:18, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Gordon Henriksen wrote: >> > >> The codegen for raise is simple. It just reads a saved return >> address from the caml_exception_pointer global and returns through >> several stack frames in one go. > > Nice. Yup. >> The try-with expression is where the trickery lies. The

Hi! I'm new to R programming, though I've been programming in other languages for years. One thing I find most frustrating about R is how difficult it is to use Google (or any other search tool) to look for answers to my R-related questions. With languages with even slightly more distinctive names like Perl, Java, Python, Matlab, OCaml, etc., usually including the name of the language

On Nov 15, 2010, at 8:42 AM, Rob Pieke wrote: > SUCCESS! > > Sorry, I had removed the addFnAttr() call by accident. Using the basicAA pass and ReadOnly, as you suggested, works like a charm! > > :) Thanks. I've updated the documentation and examples in r119169. I didn't update the OCaml documentation or examples yet. It looks like the OCaml bindings don't expose

On Nov 28, 2007, at 10:16 PM, Gordon Henriksen wrote: >> It only works if values are not held in registers across throws >> though, which is kinda lame ... > > > Though I'm primarily interested in this model only from an > interoperability perspective, reloading the register file for a throw > seems a comparatively small price to pay compared to, say, >

On 10/13/14 11:44 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Dave Pitsbawn <dpitsbawn at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Is it possible to write LLVM IR but not using C++? >> >> I'm exceedingly terrible at C++. >> >> I was thinking, isn't it possible to write the IR using Java? >> > > > You can use llvmpy (Python bindings

The safe_malloc (etc) functions call g->abort_fn on failure. That's not appropriate for language bindings, and we never intended that these internal functions be used from language bindings, that was just a historical accident. This patch series removes any external use of the safe_* functions. Rich.

As part of the fix for: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626503 I'm proposing to add two new APIs to fetch information about the list of network interfaces of an existing guest. These two patches outline the proposed API but with no implementation or tests. However they can be applied and compiled. Please see the second patch for the proposed API. I have a mostly working

-llvm-commits, +llvmdev > On Oct 2, 2014, at 2:57 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: > > Author: dexonsmith > Date: Thu Oct 2 16:56:57 2014 > New Revision: 218914 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=218914&view=rev > Log: > DI: Fold constant arguments into a single MDString > > This patch addresses the first

On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 at 19:32, Hubert Tong via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > There seems to be a split between those who prefer to curate commits >> locally and present them in the PR (i.e. Method 3) as they are to be >> committed (i.e. squash/amend/etc from my workstation and push the result), >> and those who seem to feel that it is better to avoid

Hi all, I am an LLVM newbie, thinking about using LLVM as the platform for a toy language. In this respect, I was wondering if LLVM could be used to easily weave code written in different language. For instance, let's assume I have a library written in C, some components written in C++ and some components written in OCaml (we also assume an OCaml backend for LLVM). All this code gets

Dear All, I have installed Red Hat Enterprise 3 on one Intel-32 bit machine. I have installed all systemimager/systeminstaller/flamethrower RPMS that machine. I would like to install OS through PXE boot on another Athlon machine. When I execute mkssimage for creating a image master # mksiimage --Add --name image1 --path /var/lib/systemimager/images/image1 --filename /root/rpmlist

Is it possible to write LLVM IR but not using C++? I'm exceedingly terrible at C++. I was thinking, isn't it possible to write the IR using Java? I effectively have emit some sort of binary op codes to be passed into llvm right? The same thing for if I wanted to integrate a GC? Could the interfacing be done in any other language? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Make the tests 'check_DATA' so they only get built when running the tests. This saves a couple of seconds on the build time. --- ocaml/Makefile.am | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/ocaml/Makefile.am b/ocaml/Makefile.am index e781363..a535b43 100644 --- a/ocaml/Makefile.am +++ b/ocaml/Makefile.am @@ -142,9 +142,9 @@ endif TESTS = run-bindtests

The proposed API is the same as v1, but this includes an implementation (for /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-*) and modifications to virt-inspector. This compiles and works. If you look in patch 5 you can see proposed output as virt-inspector XML for a guest (although this guest has not been booted, so a real guest would hopefully have a hwaddr="MAC" attribute too). Rich.