similar to: [LLVMdev] Alice / ML and C--/llvm

Hello, I'm a French student in computing science and I'm interested in your llvm project. We plan to build a new OS design using the Mozart-Oz language ( http://hurd.gnufans.org/bin/view/Hurd/NextHurd ). Could we "easily" implement a Mozart front-end to llvm ? Do you think llvm could be a good alternative to gcc for our project ? http://www.mozart-oz.org

On 11/1/06, Guillaume FORTAINE <guillaume.fortaine at wanadoo.fr> wrote: > >C--'s weakness is it's incompleteness (missing many major features), > >instability/bugginess, poor performance (both time to compile and the > >generated code), lack of high-level optimizations, lack of ABI > >compatibility with the native tools, lack of C++ frontend support, and the

Misters, Let me introduce myself : Guillaume FORTAINE, Engineer in Computer Science. Me and my partners are currently working on a Virtualization Firmware. After an analysis of the various solutions (Citrix, VMware and Microsoft), it seemed natural to our eyes, to enable a true bare-metal hypervisor, to go as close as possible to the hardware, hence the BIOS. That's why we are currently

On 12 June 2010 00:51, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Bill Hart <goodwillhart at googlemail.com> wrote: >> Hi Eli, >> >> On 11 June 2010 22:44, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Bill Hart <goodwillhart at googlemail.com> wrote:

>C--'s weakness is it's incompleteness (missing many major features), >instability/bugginess, poor performance (both time to compile and the >generated code), lack of high-level optimizations, lack of ABI >compatibility with the native tools, lack of C++ frontend support, and the >small size of its community. To quote Tony Hoare : "premature optimization is the

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Bill Hart <goodwillhart at googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi Eli, > > On 11 June 2010 22:44, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Bill Hart <goodwillhart at googlemail.com> wrote: >>> a) What plans are there to support addition, subtraction, >>> multiplication, division,

>Neither C-- nor LLVM provide this.  Why do you need a GLR parser >specifically? http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~smcpeak/elkhound/ Parsing with arbitrary context-free grammars has two key advantages: (1) unbounded lookahead, and (2) support for ambiguous grammars. Unbounded lookahead is achieved by allowing multiple potential parses to coexist for as long as necessary. Similarly, ambiguity

Hello all- First off I'm not a dev, just a small business owner trying to start up. I don't have a budget for much of anything & wind up doing most everything myself, which for the last year includes evaluating virtual infrastructure offerings. It's quite discouraging to see just how much doesn't "just work" for someone like me- unfortunately oVirt included (no

Hello, I'm somewhat new to R. I've searched the archive for the last year and tried to consult the manual pages for the following problem, but did not find an answer. I want to sort an array by the index values. Here is the array >acc.gp.bl.wtmn Gp17 Gp4 1 0.5703125 0.6406250 10 0.7812500 0.7109375 11 0.8046875 0.7343750 12 0.8359375 0.7890625 13 0.8515625 0.7109375

Hi, a colleague ran a stepwise discriminant analysis twice in a row and got different results, suggesting some "sochasticity" in the algorithms involved. I looked at her data and found that there was a lot of collinearity, so that I reckoned that maybe "stepclass" (klaR) cannot find a clear winner when trying to include a new variable and makes a random choice. Is that true?

hi, I recently attended one of the ruby meetings that we have in my city. There one of the speaker said that google,amazon .. are working on RoR but still the performance of RoR is not at par with J2EE others.... he meant that though google,amazon working o it they will not bring it as front applications only parts the reason ruby is slow in comparison to other languages.... and in real time

I have been struggling trying to write some code to produce all combinations subject to some restrictions. I thought someone might have some bright ideas. I have 11 values which fall into 5 groups. I want all combinations of 2,3, and 4 values where each value must be from a different group. The numbers in the groups are different. Here is a definition of the groups: groups <- list(gp1 =

Misters, Happy New Year to you. Let me introduce myself : Guillaume FORTAINE, Engineer in Computer Science. I am currently working on a Cloud Computing Firmware in an Infrastructure-as-a-Service context. The product is an UEFI Hypervisor. It puts virtualization exactly where it belongs: Into the firmware [0] Customers will be able to deploy their appliances and products directly to new

Misters, Happy New Year to you. Let me introduce myself : Guillaume FORTAINE, Engineer in Computer Science. I am currently working on a Cloud Computing Firmware in an Infrastructure-as-a-Service context. The product is an UEFI Hypervisor. It puts virtualization exactly where it belongs: Into the firmware [0] Customers will be able to deploy their appliances and products directly to new

 Hello,  I am French Engineer in Informatics and I would want to build a start  up to  manufacture mobile phones ( OEM level ). I am currently in discussion with investors. We would want to use LLVM as our main compiler but we will need to complete it to have a "commercial grade" one. Here are our goals : -Use a modified Elkhound as C/C++ front-end :

WINE 1.1.18 has a regression from WINE 1.1.14. Once again, GP4 no longer installs from CD... the console outputs the following ole error repeatedly: err:ole:xCall Failed to serialize param, hres 80040155 err:ole:deserialize_param Failed to read integer 4 byte err:ole:TMStubImpl_Invoke Failed to deserialize param State, hres 80004005 err:rpc:I_RpcReceive we got fault packet with status 0x80004005

I am having trouble plotting one of my graphs (think graph theory graph with edges and vertices, not scatterplots or histograms). For some pairs of vertices, I want multiple edges to be visible in my graph. As an example of this, in my script below, I want two edges to be visible from vertex 1 and vertex 9 (among some others) yet when I plot it, only one edge is visible.

Hello, Everyone LLVM recently was approved to take part in Google Summer of Code 2008. We welcome everyone to apply for this program. The list of ideas for (possible) projects is located at http://llvm.org/OpenProjects.html. Surely you can suggest any other project, if you feel, that it definitely can be useful. Our common requirement for student is to submit proposal to LLVM Developers

# Your mailer is set to "none" (default on Windows), # hence we cannot send the bug report directly from R. # Please copy the bug report (after finishing it) to # your favorite email program and send it to # # r-bugs@biostat.ku.dk # ###################################################### The error occurs following the third Hit <Return> below: > y_rnorm(40) >

Hi all, After searching for a decent compiler backend for ages (google sometimes isn't helpful), I recently stumbled upon LLVM. Woot!! I work on bignum arithmetic (I'm a professional mathematician) and have recently decided to switch from developing GPL'd bignum code to BSD licensed code. (See http://www.mpir.org/ which I contributed to for a while - a fork of GMP). Please bear with