similar to: [LLVMdev] 1.8 Pre-Release Ready for Testing

I've put the pre-release tar balls here: http://llvm.org/prereleases/1.7/ I'm asking for help to test this release and to review documentation. If anyone can spare some time to help out, I would really appreciate it. The more people that test, the better this release will be. Secondly, now that the tarballs have been created, everyone is free to check in documentation changes into the

I'll test on Darwin/PPC, precompiled llvmgcc, objdir == srcdir. Rob On Apr 16, 2006, at 1:42 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Tanya Lattner wrote: >> For testing, we would like a mix of people to do x86 and ppc. >> Please send email to the list if you plan to test, what >> architecture, and if you will use the llvm-gcc binary or compile >> it

I haven't seen anyone claim x86 linux objdir == srcdir, so I'll test it out. Missed the 18th,but I'll try to have it done asap. On Apr 18, 2006, at 2:51 PM, Robert L. Bocchino Jr. wrote: > I'll test on Darwin/PPC, precompiled llvmgcc, objdir == srcdir. > > Rob > > On Apr 16, 2006, at 1:42 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > >> On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Tanya Lattner

On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Tanya Lattner wrote: > For testing, we would like a mix of people to do x86 and ppc. Please send > email to the list if you plan to test, what architecture, and if you will use > the llvm-gcc binary or compile it yourself. That way, I know who to expect > results from. I will test on Darwin/PPC, I'll try the precompiled llvmgcc, objdir != srcdir. -Chris

On 4/19/06, Patrick Meredith <pmeredit at uiuc.edu> wrote: > I haven't seen anyone claim x86 linux objdir == srcdir, so I'll test it out. > Missed the 18th,but I'll try to have it done asap. > > > On Apr 18, 2006, at 2:51 PM, Robert L. Bocchino Jr. wrote: > I'll test on Darwin/PPC, precompiled llvmgcc, objdir == srcdir. > > Rob > Sorry for being

On 4/19/06, Rogelio Serrano <rogelio.serrano at gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/16/06, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > > > > I've put the pre-release tar balls here: > > http://llvm.org/prereleases/1.7/ > > > > The build failed on i686-pc-linux-gnu. > > llvm[2]: Flexing FileLexer.l > llvm[2]: Compiling FileLexer.cpp for Release build

I've uploaded the 2.0 pre-release to this location: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.0/ If you have free time and would like to help test this release, please download the appropriate tarballs from the website. Here are a few ways you can help test this release: 1) Download llvm-gcc4 binary and llvm. Compile and run make check. 2) Download llvm-gcc4 binary, llvm, and llvm-test. Compile, run

On 2009-08-31 08:50, Tanya Lattner wrote: > LLVMers, > > 2.6 pre-release1 is ready to be tested by the community. > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ > Hi Tanya, Here are the results for x86_64 Linux (Debian unstable): > You will notice that we have quite a few pre-compiled binaries (of > both clang and llvm-gcc). We have identified several bugs that will be > fixed in

Hi Tanya, I have tried the 2.6 pre-release on the following host : Windows XP pro SP2 with mingw/msys : uname -a MINGW32_NT-5.1 OLIVE 1.0.10(0.46/3/2) 2004-03-15 07:17 i686 unknown gcc -v Reading specs from d:/mingw/bin/../lib/gcc/mingw32/3.4.5/specs Configured with: ../gcc-3.4.5/configure --with-gcc --with-gnu-ld --with-gnu-as --host=mingw32 --target=mingw32 --prefix=/mingw --enable-threads

Tanya Lattner wrote: > LLVMers, > > 2.6 pre-release1 is ready to be tested by the community. > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ > > You will notice that we have quite a few pre-compiled binaries (of > both clang and llvm-gcc). We have identified several bugs that will be > fixed in pre-release2, so please search the bug database before filing > a new bug. > >

I've updated the pre-release tarballs online. I'm also extending the testing completion date to May 22nd at 5pm PDT. The new release target date is May 23rd. If you have any free time, please give the new pre-release a try. Thanks to all who have tested LLVM! -Tanya P.S. Documentation review should still be completed today! Thanks! > I've uploaded the 2.0 pre-release to this

On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 6:24 AM, Olivier Meurant<meurant.olivier at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Tanya, > > I have tried the 2.6 pre-release on the following host : > > Windows XP pro SP2 with mingw/msys : > > uname -a > MINGW32_NT-5.1 OLIVE 1.0.10(0.46/3/2) 2004-03-15 07:17 i686 unknown > > gcc -v > Reading specs from d:/mingw/bin/../lib/gcc/mingw32/3.4.5/specs

Tanya, I have done make check and nightly report tests on LLVM on the GCC 4.2.0 release, on Linux x86 32 bit. On make check the bit intrinsics test is still failing but it works from the command line, strange ? What files do you want from the nightly report, as I am not familiar with it ? I will be doing Cygwin tests next. Aaron ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tanya M.

LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release1 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ You will notice that we have quite a few pre-compiled binaries (of both clang and llvm-gcc). We have identified several bugs that will be fixed in pre-release2, so please search the bug database before filing a new bug. If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the

> On make check the bit intrinsics test is still failing but it works from the > command line, strange ? Did Chris help you with this or is it still an issue? > What files do you want from the nightly report, as I am not familiar with it > ? in llvm-test, if you run the gmake TEST=nightly report command it will generated a report.nightly.txt file. Thats what I want to see. Thanks!

On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Emil Mikulic wrote: >> The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: >> http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ > > I suspect the utils/TableGen/FileParser.h.cvs in the tarball may be > stale. I tried building LLVM without bison installed and got: Can you try it again without bison with these files:

Hi Tanya, The sources weren't updated for this pre-release testing. So I had the same problems on PPC. -bw On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Tanya Lattner<lattner at apple.com> wrote: > LLVMers, > 2.6 pre-release1 is ready to be tested by the community. > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ > You will notice that we have quite a few pre-compiled binaries (of both > clang

Aaron, On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 22:54 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote: > Tanya, > > I have done make check and nightly report tests on LLVM on the GCC 4.2.0 > release, on Linux x86 32 bit. > > On make check the bit intrinsics test is still failing but it works from the > command line, strange ? Can you be a bit more specific about which test is failing? Reid. > > What

On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 12:25:40PM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Emil Mikulic wrote: > >> The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: > >> http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ > > > > I suspect the utils/TableGen/FileParser.h.cvs in the tarball may be > > stale. I tried building LLVM without bison installed and got:

On Sep 17, 2007, at 6:59 PM, Emil Mikulic wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 12:25:40PM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: >> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Emil Mikulic wrote: >>>> The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: >>>> http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ >>> >>> I suspect the utils/TableGen/FileParser.h.cvs in the tarball may be